Image:Kilgallengarage.jpg

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Licensing

This is a piece of public art that I took the picture of and as such is considered a fair-use derivative for copyright purposes.

Fair Use for Margaret Kilgallen article includes:

  1. This is a significant artwork that could not be conveyed in words.
  2. This notable example is typical of significant artist's work.
  3. There is no alternative, public domain or free-copyrighted replacement available.
  4. Inclusion is for information, education and analysis only.
  5. Its inclusion in the article adds significantly to the article because it shows the work of the subject of the article.
  6. The image is a low resolution copy of the original work of such low quality that it would be unlikely to impact sales of the work.
  7. The original has since been destroyed.

Fair Use for Mission School article includes:

  1. This is a significant artwork that could not be conveyed in words.
  2. This notable example is typical of "artistic genre or technique" for commentary.
  3. There is no alternative, public domain or free-copyrighted replacement available.
  4. Inclusion is for information, education and analysis only.
  5. Its inclusion in the article adds significantly to the article because it shows the work of the subject of the article.
  6. The image is a low resolution copy of the original work of such low quality that it would be unlikely to impact sales of the work.
  7. The original has since been destroyed.

Fair Use for Los Angeles County Museum of Art article includes:

  1. This is a significant artwork that could not be conveyed in words.
  2. This notable example of the Museum's relationship with contemporary artists involved in significant local art movement (Mission School), recognized by peers and mainstream media.
  3. There is no alternative, public domain or free-copyrighted replacement available.
  4. Inclusion is for information, education and analysis only.
  5. Its inclusion in the article adds significantly to the article because it shows the work of the subject of the article.
  6. The image is a low resolution copy of the original work of such low quality that it would be unlikely to impact sales of the work.
  7. The original has since been destroyed, by the museum for renovation.

File history

Click on a date/time to view the file as it appeared at that time.

Date/TimeDimensionsUserComment
current22:28, 28 October 2006351×374 (127 KB)Peter G Werner (Talk | contribs)

The following pages on the English Wikipedia link to this file (pages on other projects are not listed):