User talk:Khumpita

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Regarding your edits to Vangteh:

Your recent edit to Vangteh (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. You have been identified as a new user or a logged out editor using a hosting or shared IP address to add email addresses, phone numbers, YouTube, Geocities, Myspace, Facebook, blog, forum, or other such free-hosting website links to a non-talk page. Please note that such links are generally to be avoided. You can restore any other content by editing the page and re-adding that content. The links can be reviewed and restored by established users. Thank you for contributing! // VoABot II 16:09, 31 October 2007 (UTC)


A tag has been placed on Vangteh, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Nonsense or hoax: there are no relevant ghits for "Vangteh" and none at all for "Guite Dynasty" or "Guite Uk-gam". No references. Article written by SPA.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet very basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. andy 22:23, 31 October 2007 (UTC)

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Vangteh, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.


[edit] Speedy deletion of Vangteh

A tag has been placed on Vangteh requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ARendedWinter 08:56, 6 November 2007 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, such as Vangteh, you will be blocked. andy 12:27, 6 November 2007 (UTC)

  • Thank you for your comments. In future please use my Talk page - the User page is not intended for discussions. In answer to your question, I felt that the article should be deleted for the reasons I gave. I did not delete myself it because I'm not an administrator - I simply said I thought it should be deleted. An administrator reviewed it and agreed with me. This article has now been deleted several times. If you want to re-create it you should address the problems, and it might be a good idea to discuss it with an administrator first (not me). andy 12:59, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Vangteh : refs

  • I have reverted your last edit to Vangteh. There is NO NEED to put in your own notes with your own reference numbers pointing to them. Merely put the notes in <ref> ... </ref> markers, and at the <references/> marker Wikipedia will automatically display the notes with their reference numbers. I have incorporated many of your long notes into the text. Anthony Appleyard 20:53, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
  • I have again made page Vangteh easier to read and easier to edit by incorporating the many long notes into the text. In particular, a long note inserted inside a sentence makes the text difficult to edit. See Wikify for useful advice. Also, try to keep information classified into titled sections and avoid writing in essay style. Anthony Appleyard 06:31, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
  • See end of User talk:Anthony Appleyard#Vangteh. Anthony Appleyard 12:16, 13 November 2007 (UTC)