From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
|
This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Languages, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative, and easy-to-use resource about languages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. |
|
Stub |
This article has been rated as stub-Class on the quality scale. |
|
This article is part of WikiProject China, a project to improve all China-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other China-related articles, please join the project. All interested editors are welcome. |
Stub |
This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the quality scale. (add comments) |
華
|
This article is maintained by the Chinese history workgroup. |
More information about this article...
|
|
|
This article is part of WikiProject Khitan:Khitan, an attempt to improve content and create better coordination between articles related to warfare, cultural practices and customs of Khitans. Please participate in improvement by editing Khitan language and related pages, or visit the WikiProject Khitan main page for more details on the projects.
- Khitan Proposed naming conventions: Ketuyu (可突于, d. 734) such as Pinyin name (Chinese caracter, b. date of born-d. date of death, r. date of reign)
|
??? |
This article has not yet received a rating on the Project's quality scale. Please rate the article and then leave a short summary here to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article. |
There is really no evidence that the Kitan small script is derived from the Uygur script. It is possible (and even likely) that it was inspired by the Uygur script and/or the runiform Turkic script, but it was not "derived" from the Uygur script. -Andrew
Also, in fact, a fair number of Kitan graphemes have been deciphered, and there is a decent-sized corpus of words that have been reconstructed with relative accuracy. Therefore, it is better to say that the Kitan scripts have only been partially deciphered, although, surely, much work remains to be done. Nevertheless, we must give credit to all the scholars who have initiated the decipherment process, and who have opened up the door (if only a small crack) to the world of the Kitan language. -Andrew
We should probably mention that Diela was a Kitan prince, and not just a "scholar".