User talk:Khalidmn

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This user is a sock puppet of Mariam83, and has been blocked indefinitely.
Please refer to contributions for evidence.

Account information: block log – current autoblocks – edits – logs

Presuming you're editing in good faith, before further reverts, discuss thoroughly. There is a 3 Revert rule that you've already violated. Collounsbury 20:06, 20 June 2007 (UTC)

I am trying my best. Have you warned the other user as well? He/She as reverted more than thrice. Khalidmn 20:09, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
I have been blocked from editing for no apparent reason by FayysalF. I believe it is inappropriate for admins to block without warning and I intend to report these actions. Khalidmn 20:18, 20 June 2007 (UTC)

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "Accused of block evasion. Absolute nonsense. I was in fact notified by a friend about the unfairness of the entire process and encouraged to contribute. I edited several articles about living persons, and cited sources. Two contributors kept reverting to older versions that use unverifiable sources- but one of wikipedia's rules about sourcing is: exceptional claims require exceptional sources. I asked them to use an annotated source, but they refused. I suspect admin is abusing his authority as I was not warned nor was anything discussed. Acting admin and contributors involved in edit war als appear to know each other, and appear to be working in conjunction with one another> absolute authority. I have been blocked indenititely for trying to render a couple of articles more neutral and objective. More experienced wikipedians appear to be using their leverage against a newcomer. Acting admin appears to favor certain biased views, abuses privileges to further personal preferencs. Same admin appears to have locked other pages at the request of contributos engaged in war edit"

Decline reason: "Even if not evading block, 3RR still has been violated and is pretty non-negotiable. — OcatecirT 04:49, 21 June 2007 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.