User talk:Kghusker

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hey, Kghusker here, thanks to the Wikipedians who contributed here, whose notes I then summarized. Please feel welcome to add more!

1 Bookmarks
2 Notes
3 Copyright problems with Image:Bridge jesus.GIF
4 Do not delete comments from your talk page!
5 NFL Playoffs: request new review for GA
6 Service flag GA failed
7 Cleanup of Schuerman
8 Facing the Giants Good Article review
9 Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Facing the giants.jpg
10 Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Facing the giants2.jpg
11 Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Facing the giants3.jpg
12 Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Flywheel poster.jpg
13 Disputed fair use rationale for Image:OneNightWithTheKing.jpg

[edit] Bookmarks

Manual of Style, and the Cheatsheet
For help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up and answer your questions.
Wikipedia:Userboxes
Good articles list, candidates and criteria. Featured article criteria.
Vandal reporting here.
contributions
Japanophile Chris, film project Cbrown1023
Lake_Chaubunagungamaug, Four_Spiritual_Laws
Edit count page and Mike's edit counter

[edit] Notes

Please be sure to capitalize when you rate. For example, |class=Stub not |class=stub.
Delete personal pages with {{db-owner}}, not Proposed Deletion. The latter is for main namespace and takes 5 days. The former is quicker.
Use [[Tommy Tenny]] not [[Tommy_Tenny]] for links. The underscore shows up in the URL but is not needed on the wikipages.
Film template: {{Film|class=Start|importance=Low}}
Novel template: {{Novels|class=Stub|importance=Low}}
Biography project: {{WPBiography|class=Start|priority=Low|core=no}}
Disambiguation autotag: {{otheruses}}
The name trick, {{BASEPAGENAME}}
Contributions trick, [[Special:Contributions/{{BASEPAGENAME}}|contributions]]
{{GAnominee|[[2006-12-25]]}}
Footnote needed: {{verify source}}
Footnote form: <ref name="test1">[http://www.qqwxyz.com external link here.] Further explanation here.</ref>
Footnote ibid: <ref name="test1"/>
Footnotes section at bottom: <references/>
"Prodding," or nominating for deletion for cause: {{subst:prod|reason}} to the top of the main article page, and {{subst:PRODWarning|Article title}} ~~~~ on the author's page.
<blockquote> and </blockquote>
{simplify}
Priorities Table:

	urgent	not urgent
important	1	2
not important	3	4

[edit] Copyright problems with Image:Bridge jesus.GIF

An image that you uploaded, Image:Bridge jesus.GIF, has been listed at Wikipedia:Copyright problems because it is a suspected copyright violation. Please look there if you know that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), and then provide the necessary information there and on its page, if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Sixtrojans 03:57, 3 February 2007 (UTC)

Replying to your comments on my talk page here: the image you recreated is substantially the same as what appears on the Web site you referenced. Just because you used a graphic design program to recreate it does not give you the right to release it into the public domain. You may want to consult with an intellectual property attorney before you pursue this matter. --Sixtrojans 16:19, 3 February 2007 (UTC)

It definitely isn't a PD, but it may be Fair use. So currently, you are wrong. Cbrown1023 talk 21:53, 7 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Do not delete comments from your talk page!

It is against Wikipedia policy to remove comments from your talk page.--Sixtrojans 16:31, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
SECOND WARNING: Do not delete comments from your talk page. --Sixtrojans 15:06, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
- Technically, it is not against policy to remove comments from your talk page, although it is is greatly frowned-upon. Cbrown1023 talk 21:56, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
Thank you for attempting to make Wikipedia a better site. I am however concerned that a number of your edits to the Four Spiritual Laws article do not follow Wikipedia policies and guidelines. I would recommend you review the following articles before making additional contributions:
- Copyrights
- Fair Use
- Avoid Weasel Words
- Reliable Sources (Especially the sections on self-published sources and extremist sources)
- No Original Research

These policies and guidelines were established to ensure the integrity of Wikipedia as a reliable encyclopedia. --Sixtrojans 16:44, 4 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] NFL Playoffs: request new review for GA

I noticed you made the last Good Article review. I have made the requested changes. Could you re-review it and see what you think? --Jayron 32 00:24, 7 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Service flag GA failed

I have failed service flag as a GAC at this time for the reasons described on its talk page. If you have any questions, please contact me on my talk page and I'll get back to you as soon as I can. --Nehrams2020 07:58, 12 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Cleanup of Schuerman

In case you're wondering: I am cleaning up surname pages that got created by a now banned wikipedian. One of your surname pages (Schuerman) followed the exact same bad pattern, therefore I cleaned it up as well (per WP:SU). Since you didn't provide any people with the exact same spelling of the surname, cleaning up your page meant merging useful content into Schürmann and putting all other redirects up for speedy deletion. – sgeureka ^t•c 09:00, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Facing the Giants Good Article review

An article you have contribute to Facing the Giants has been nominated for WP:GA/R. You are welcome to contribute to the discussion concerning the article's GA status there. Drewcifer 04:00, 7 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Facing the giants.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Facing the giants.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 05:27, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Facing the giants2.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Facing the giants2.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Facing the giants3.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Facing the giants3.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Flywheel poster.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Flywheel poster.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:OneNightWithTheKing.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:OneNightWithTheKing.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.