User talk:Kfc18645

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Temporary

Contents

[edit] Purmerland

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia by creating the page Purmerland. Your test worked, and the page that you created has been or soon will be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. --Valley2city₪‽ 06:53, 5 April 2007 (UTC)

Thanks. I've fixed it.Kfc1864 07:20, 17 April 2007 (UTC)

Motifs in William Hope Hodgson's Fiction

Welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome your help to create new content, but your recent additions (such as Motifs in William Hope Hodgson's Fiction) are considered nonsense. Please refrain from creating nonsense articles. If you want to test things out, edit the sandbox instead. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. -Panser Born- (talk) 09:07, 6 April 2007 (UTC)

I've replied to your comment over at my talk page to keep the conversation together. -Panser Born- (talk) 09:19, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
Also, could you please reply at the bottom of the page, and keep your comments in the same section? Cheers, -Panser Born- (talk) 09:22, 6 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] For future reference:

As a courtesy to other editors, it is a Wikipedia guideline to sign your posts on talk pages, user talk pages, and WikiProject pages. To do so, simply add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your comments and your user name or IP address and the date will be automatically added along with a timestamp. Signing your comments helps people to find out who said something and provides them with a link to your user/talk page (for further discussion). For further info, read Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines. Thank you.

Thanks.Kfc1864 07:21, 17 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] adoption

Hi there; I will happily adopt you, and I have added the adoption template to your userpage. I suppose you realise that, as you are in Korea and I am in the UK, we will not usually be on line at trhe same time. But leave a message here or on my talk page and I will get back to you. I am on line every day.--Anthony.bradbury 10:01, 6 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] An Automated Message from HagermanBot

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button Image:Wikisigbutton.png located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! HagermanBot 10:04, 6 April 2007 (UTC) .ThanksKfc1864 13:28, 6 April 2007 (UTC)

I will be on-line for the next 5 or 6 hours, so can contact you when you need to ask me something.

I have fixed your "its/it's" userbox.--Anthony.bradbury 17:31, 6 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] In regard to your comments on User talk:Panser Born

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. However, we remind you not to attack other editors, as you did here: User talk:Panser Born. Please comment on the contributions and not the contributors. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. -Panser Born- (talk) 13:40, 6 April 2007 (UTC)

I saw it. Can you do the other box, pleese?

[edit] Contact

You have now asked me on two occasions to contact you later. I do not understand. When you have a specific problem, or question, I will contact you via your talk page to answer it. I am not going to contact you by any means other than via your talk page.--Anthony.bradbury 21:03, 6 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Advice

I have just looked at your recent interaction with User:Panser Born. I would like to give you a few items of advice.

1. Always assume that a wikipedia administrator knows more about wikipedia than you do.

2. Always assume that a user who has been here longer than you, although he has no authority over you, knows more than you do.

3. Never, ever, be rude or offensive to any editor, however experienced they may be.

4. If you do not know something, recognise and admit it.

5. If you do not know, ask. Do not guess.--Anthony.bradbury 01:20, 7 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Userbox

When you send a comment to a user, you should either make a new heading by first clicking on the "+" box at the top of the screen, or if you are answering a previous comment put your answer with the said previous comment.

To answer your question, yes I can probably fix the box, but I need to know what it is trying to say. What is Scepia Empire Earth, and do you like it or hate it?--Anthony.bradbury 11:00, 7 April 2007 (UTC)

To help you, I need an answer to this question.--Anthony.bradbury 13:52, 7 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Your userpage

By the way, you claim on your userpage to have made 100 edits; you have actually made 77, half of them to your own page. By comparison, I have made about 6,300, and many editors have made more. The highest number of edits made by one person is over 150,000. Barnstars are awarded as a mark of gratitude or respect; you do not ask for them.--Anthony.bradbury 11:06, 7 April 2007 (UTC)

Unless you are prepared to engage in meaningful dialogue, there is no point in using the adoption process. Please let me know, within the next few days, whether you intend to communicate or not.--Anthony.bradbury 13:24, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for that. I've been busy over the last few days.I'll talk whenever I can.Kfc1864 13:27, 9 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Barnstars and addition

I see your hoping for some barnstars. Before that happens its probably worth seeing the sort of contributions which are appreciated and which are not. Alas your contribution to addition falls into the latter category and has been reverted. --Salix alba (talk) 13:23, 8 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Wikifun

Round 14 is starting just about now. --Spondoolicks 16:51, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Charles Box

I have added a "{{prod}}" template to the article Charles Box, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. DGG 08:58, 11 April 2007 (UTC)

Well, Maybe you've got the wrong author.I think I put a speedy deletion thing on it.....Kfc1864 06:02, 12 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Speedy tags

Hi there; there are actually specifically designed {{speedy}} tags, which can be found at WP:CSD. --Anthony.bradbury 09:46, 12 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Adoption

Hi there

To judge by the lack of queries, you do not need to be an adoptee. Unless I hear differently from you, I will remove the adopt user-box in a couple of days.--Anthony.bradbury 23:54, 19 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Tables

Try in WP:INFOBOX.--Anthony.bradbury 13:18, 20 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Kfc18645, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} after the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! Kfc1864 09:49, 22 April 2007 (UTC)

This is the first time that I have seen an editor welcome himself!--Anthony.bradbury 18:31, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
Hee Heee

[edit] Cricketers

I'm guessing that you're the editor who queried the notability of Yorkshire fast bowler Mel Ryan. Perhaps you're unaware that all first class cricketers, by wikipedia policy and precedent, are notable. Did you check up on this before you tagged it? The cricket archive and cricinfo references given on the page clearly establish these player's notability, as you'd have seen if you have actually looked at them. Please check up on these guidelines as they've been reiterated time and time again. You might like to check out the deletion discussion for 'Alfred Brown' for instance. If it wasn't you who tagged this, I apologise. If you still think first class cricketers aren't notable, then I suggest you tag this article for deletion and see what other editors think about it. Nick mallory 11:48, 24 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Motto of the day nomination

I noticed several edits of yours, attempting to place your nomination under the "In review" section of the nominations page. The source of your trouble probably lies in the fact that the "In review" section is transcluded from Wikipedia:Motto of the day/Nominations/In review. To add your motto to that subpage, you can either click the section edit link on the nominations page, or go directly to the subpage. MotD welcomes your future contributions! --Tewy 01:26, 25 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Sea of Japan

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Sea of Japan. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content which gains a consensus among editors. Thank you.

Please be advised that the wording of the "Naming dispute" section within Sea of Japan, has already been discussed in Talk:Sea of Japan. Any further changes must have enough consensus in Talk:Sea of Japan first, before you change it. Also, any additional material pertaining to the "Naming dispute" belongs in the Sea of Japan naming dispute instead, and not in Sea of Japan. Please be advised.--Endroit 15:42, 25 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Adoptees

They no longer needed to be adopted.

And no, I do not know how to create userboxes in different languages; the technique will be the same, but the abbreviations are not known to me.--Anthony.bradbury 18:37, 25 April 2007 (UTC)

I didn't know where I was supposed to respond, so I responded here. But if you need me to change where I respond to, let me know. I've only started out as a wikipedian and would like help just learning the ropes. Thanks. (-coughcough- Muahahahahahah 15:34, 22 May 2007 (UTC)CainRBloodfang)

[edit] A suggestion

You have not been here very long, and have not made many edits. You have attempted, with only partial success, to become involved in various aspects of Wikipedia maintenance. May I suggest that it would be better if, at least until you gain experience, you concentrate on writing mainspace articles?--Anthony.bradbury 18:40, 25 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Re:Thanks

Reply to comment here:

No problem, anytime. Just where did you get the idea for that, though? Hersfold (talk/work) 22:00, 26 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Barnstar

(moved to userpage per user's request) Ref (chew)(do) 04:28, 2 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Your barnstar

Hi. I picked your question up from Anthony's talk page, about what to do with your Barnstar (congratulations!).

You can either leave it where it is, or transfer it to your user page, in the section you have for Barnstars. Any problems with the transfer, I'll do it for you if you wish, let me know here. Keep up the vandal-fighting - good work. Ref (chew)(do) 04:23, 2 May 2007 (UTC)

Done. It's a bit squashed, you may need to re-arrange your userboxes when you get time. Best wishes. Ref (chew)(do) 04:31, 2 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Grapes

Wowzerz! You're the second person to mention grapes!! I just like grapes a lot, that's it... Also, take a look at this barnstar!!!

(barnstar moved)Kfc1864 03:52, 1 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Re:CartoonNetwork

Well, I track most of the shows, I revert vandalism to the respective articles, and I update and standardise when I see it's needed. I hope I answered your question, but why are you interested? —May the Edit be with you, always. (T-borg) (drop me a line) 17:18, 8 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Welcome!

Hi, and welcome to the Military history WikiProject! As you may have guessed, we're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to military history.

A few features that you might find helpful:

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask one of the project coordinators, or any experienced member of the project, and we'll be happy to help you. Again, welcome! We look forward to seeing you around! Carom 04:04, 9 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Disputes

I would suggest that you leave disputes to more experienced editors to sort out. But for your information, the page to look at is WP:DR--Anthony.bradbury 09:58, 10 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Archiving

See Wikipedia talk:How to archive a talk page.--Anthony.bradbury 18:49, 10 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Thanks!

Thanks for signing my autograph book! ♠Tom@sBat 20:12, 14 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Removal of Speedy Deletion tags

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices, as you did with Ilax railway/Ilax. Please use the {{hangon}} template on the page instead if you disagree with the deletion. Thank you. -- EdJogg 14:23, 15 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Independence

Good luck to you - I will remove template from my page; you can do yours. Feel free to ask if you need advice, and remember, do not try and do too much too soon. Happy wikying.--Anthony.bradbury 15:10, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] RE:Tag Confusion

I'm not sure what you meant by that. Please respond, ~ Magnus animuM ≈ √∞ 12:31, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

Oh, that page! I'll get on that momentarily. ~ Magnus animuM ≈ √∞ 13:04, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Military history WikiProject coordinator selection

The Military history WikiProject coordinator selection process is starting. We are looking to elect nine coordinators to serve for the next six months; if you are interested in running, please sign up here by August 14! Kirill 03:32, 7 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Everything OK?

What's with this edit summary? Deiz talk 03:42, 15 August 2007 (UTC)

Well, as another editor has noted in your editor review, I would suggest you change your philosophy on that. A gibberish edit summary is as bad as if not worse than no summary at all. As I'm sure you're aware, this is not the desired result of prompting editors to leave an edit summary. Cheers, Deiz talk 04:59, 15 August 2007 (UTC)

As of August 19, you are still getting away w/ it. Please follow the edit summary Guideline. I hope there would be no need for a third admin to remind you of this. Thank you. -- FayssalF - Wiki me up® 00:58, 19 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Military history WikiProject coordinator election

The Military history WikiProject coordinator election has begun. We will be selecting nine coordinators from a pool of fourteen candidates to serve for the next six months. Please vote here by August 28! Kirill 17:34, 18 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] GEwar Times

I've declined speedy (already done that twice) and nominated at WP:AFD, in which you are free to participate. Technically G4 requires that the previous post have been following an afd, which is now in the works but hasn't been done before on this (never survived that long I guess). Carlossuarez46 00:34, 21 August 2007 (UTC)

  • Sorry, the guy after you did then. Anyway, I still think it's nn but it keeps coming back so now it's at Afd. Carlossuarez46 00:37, 21 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Korean War

Well, it might be a little early, but I'm sure I fixed all of Kirill's points (this was way back 2-3 weeks ago, can't remember)

And considering the effort I put in, I don't think it was a bad idea. Mr. Killigan 02:01, 25 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] You shouldn't have done that

If you would come into the WW2 template discussion page you would see that the image you reverted was approved to be better by a majority of 7-0, and theirs another guy who sopported it in the WW2 article discussion page, which made it a 8-0 concensus. You cant revert a picture chosen by a majority by the argument "i dont like it". When i was a new editor i also didn't know that so for the future, please first check discussion pages before making reverts. M.V.E.i. 12:38, 26 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Thanks

Thanks for the Wikichevrons :) Parsecboy 12:30, 28 August 2007 (UTC)

I fixed it. You forgot the little | after the WikiChevrons bit. Thanks again :) Parsecboy 12:36, 28 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] A warning

User:Winky Bill (who is likely the permanently banned user User:Jetwave Dave; yeah, he apparently has a thing for me :) ) has recently copied the award you gave me this morning to his own user page, complete with your signature. I don't know what you want to do about it, but I thought you might want to know. Parsecboy 22:13, 28 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Thx

Thx a lot my friend. I will fix that later.

Loves

Kızılsungur 05:42, 2 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XVIII (August 2007)

The August 2007 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

Delivered by grafikbot 09:43, 5 September 2007 (UTC)


Hello, I read your statement you made on the South Korean hostage article's discussion and I was wondering if you would not mind weighing in on the current murder vs kill terminology used to describe the acts that were committed against the South Koreans. Being how wiki is about presenting an unbiased truth, I thought that the criminal act of homicide that was committed should be recorded and presented to the general public. However, others believe that murder has too much bias attributed to it and think that it should be killed so as to not say that the terrorists were unjust in taking the lives of their victims. While I agree that I was overboard with saying "murdered in cold blood," I do feel that murdered is truth and not in any way a form of bias. Would you mind weighing in on the article's discussion board?

74.243.81.189 19:36, 10 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Thank you very much :)

For your comment and inquiry [1]. I've reviewed your userpage, and some of your edit history, and I would be a proud to be adopted by you.

I would eventually like a decent user-page that reflects my vision of Wikipedia and the contributions I intend to make, however I have very little direction and seem to be quickly drawn into vandal fighting (it is non-stop!). So I apologize for my userpage's rather blank look. It would be an honor if you adopt me and help develop my contribution skills. I'll await your reply! DigitalNinja 02:24, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

Is this kind of [2] diff the kind of thing you want to see? DigitalNinja 03:08, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
Maybe this too? [3] :) DigitalNinja 05:08, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] RFA Thanks

Click there to open your card! → → →

[edit] user talk:Giggy

Not particularly, no. But thanks for the note :)  — Dihydrogen Monoxide (H2O) 09:35, 1 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Please, explain

Why is my Wikipedia "My talk" page scheduled for demolition. My family history is on it. Please, don't elete it without first explaining to me what is going on -- Thank you -- BTW, I can't sign here until I get home. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Migdiachinea (talk • contribs) 17:18, 3 October 2007 (UTC)

__________________________________________________________________________________

Hi -- sir or madam: I thought this was my talk page -- how is it a bulletin board? Please, explain. Mig 13:29, 4 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Dead Body With Clear Face in the Article Korea War

Hi Kfc1864, thanks for the message, I found the previous discusion. I still feel very upset about this bloody picture with clear face as the soldier's identity. I wish you understand. Dongwenliang 15:28, 6 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] please

May I ask you to please limit your comments at Goguryeo:Talk to editing-related issues. After all, as per the policies of Wikimedia, article talk pages are not a forum to discuss related ideas -- article talk pages are strictly for discussions related to editing only. Comments like yours are not necessaruily bad BUT they tend to stir the pot -- as you can see some misinformed editor has left an equally off-topic comment. I hope you may see my point and help us to keep the article and the talk page on topic. Regards, 70.53.130.220 12:08, 7 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XIX (September 2007)

The September 2007 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

Delivered by grafikbot 09:50, 8 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] AfD on Human chemistry

Hi there, the article has been changed substantially since your vote so you might want to have another look at the new version. All the best Tim Vickers 16:05, 9 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XX (October 2007)

The October 2007 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

Delivered by grafikbot 14:19, 3 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] archive

I've restored your talk archive, as Anthony.bradbury is away from the keyboard for a short while. ··coelacan 18:38, 9 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] 1.5 month old GA review

I guess it can be moved, but is there an easy way to move it so that it is easy to find again for reference? Many of the points still need to be addressed before the article can be re-assessed again. wbfergus Talk 13:00, 11 November 2007 (UTC)

Or maybe a specially named archive, similar to the Chinese Casualties archive? If this fails additional reviews, then there's an easy place to refer back to for continuing or comments from reviewers. I don't know for sure, but I'd like an easy way to refer back when I have the time to dedicate to try addressing some of the problems. wbfergus Talk 13:27, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
Okay, hopefully this helps. I've created an archive page just for the GA (and any future) review discussions. While I was at it, I also configured the page to automatically archive any discussions sections that haven't had activity in 30 days. As I was doing it though, I was wondering if it may be better to include the year and month in the archive name, instead of just an arbitrary, yet sequential, number. If so, if seems easy enough to setup for that. Ideas or suggestions? wbfergus Talk 16:04, 11 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXI (November 2007)

The November 2007 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot 01:58, 2 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] The Military history WikiProject Newsletter — Issue XXII (December 2007)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter
Issue XXII (December 2007)
Project news
Articles of note

New featured articles:

  1. Battle of Albuera
  2. Battle of Dyrrhachium (1081)
  3. Battle of the Gebora
  4. Constantine II of Scotland
  5. Francis Harvey
  6. Vasa (ship)
  7. Wulfhere of Mercia

New A-Class articles:

  1. 1962 South Vietnamese Presidential Palace bombing
  2. Evacuation of East Prussia
Current proposals and discussions
Awards and honors
  • Blnguyen has been awarded the WikiChevrons with Oak Leaves in recognition of his efforts in improving the quality of articles related to Vietnamese military history, including the creation of numerous A-Class articles.
  • Woodym555 has been awarded the WikiChevrons with Oak Leaves in recognition of his outstanding work on topics related to the Victoria Cross, notably including the creation of featured articles, featured lists, and a featured topic.
  • For their outstanding efforts as part of Tag & Assess 2007, Bedford, TomStar81, and Parsival74 have been awarded the gold, silver, and bronze Wikis, respectively.
Tag & Assess 2007

Tag & Assess 2007 is now officially over, with slightly under 68,000 articles processed. The top twenty scores are as follows:

1. Bedford — 7,600
2. TomStar81 — 5,500
3. Parsival74 — 5,200
4. FayssalF — 3,500
5. Roger Davies — 3,000
6. Ouro — 2600
7. Kateshortforbob — 2250
8. Cromdog — 2,200
9. BrokenSphere — 2000
9. Jacksinterweb — 2,000
9. Maralia — 2,000
12. MBK004 — 1,340
13. JKBrooks85 — 1,250
14. Sniperz11 — 1100
15. Burzmali — 1000
15. Cplakidas — 1000
15. Gimme danger — 1000
15. Raoulduke471000
15. TicketMan — 1000
15. Welsh — 1000
15. Blnguyen — 1000

Although the drive is officially closed, existing participants can continue tagging until January 31 if they wish, with the extra tags counting towards their tally for barnstar purposes.

We'd like to see what lessons can be learned from this drive, so we've set up a feedback workshop. Comments and feedback from participants and non-participants alike are very welcome and appreciated.

To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please list yourself in the appropriate section here.


Note: This newsletter was automatically delivered. Regards from the automated, Anibot (talk) 23:40, 7 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Move

As you can see, I have, as requested moved your user and talk pages. You will have to tidy them, and re-archive your talk page, if you wish, under your new name. Do you want your old page deleted? --Anthony.bradbury"talk" 11:33, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXIII (January 2008)

The January 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 00:18, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Military history WikiProject coordinator elections

The Military history WikiProject coordinator selection process is starting. We are aiming to elect nine coordinators to serve for the next six months; if you are interested in running, please sign up here by February 14! Kirill 03:26, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Milhist coordinators election has started

The February 2008 Military history WikiProject coordinator election has begun. We will be selecting nine coordinators to serve for the next six months from a pool of fifteen candidates. Please vote here by February 28. --ROGER DAVIES talk 11:03, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXIV (February 2008)

The February 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 04:52, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXV (March 2008)

The March 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 01:43, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXVI (April 2008)

The April 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 01:19, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXVII (May 2008)

The May 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 01:07, 3 June 2008 (UTC)