User talk:Kewp

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

/Archive 1

Contents

[edit] 300 / National Review

Hello, I notice you've added a review from The National Review to the 300 page. You will have noticed that the reviews are presently organized by type of media outlet, and at present there is none for political weeklies. If we're to open one, we would of course have to include, e.g., The New Republic and The Nation as well. Is that something you would be interested in working on? Best, --Javits2000 21:39, 19 March 2007 (UTC)

In the meantime I've trimmed the description of the "post 9-11" world to focus on the characterization of the film itself; and moved it under the "political aspects" header. Let me know what you think, Best, --Javits2000 22:02, 19 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Cartesian Plain?

I think it is quite inapt to redirect Cartesian plain to Cartesian coordinate system without letting the user know they misspelled the word plane. There is no such thing as a cartesian plain and we should not lull users into believing that their spelling is correct.Zain Ebrahim 17:31, 29 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] typos

Hello, I think there might be a few typos under your "stuff". Two links don't work Faustus Tacitus 22:31, 15 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Mormon fundamentalism/merged article

A {{prod}} template has been added to the article Mormon fundamentalism/merged article, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. 159.182.1.4 16:21, 16 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] AfD nomination of Thomas Arthur Green

Thomas Arthur Green, an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that Thomas Arthur Green satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thomas Arthur Green and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Thomas Arthur Green during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Eliz81 21:08, 16 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Timothy Leary

Please don't add stuff to the article that's not written in a neutral point of view. Thanks, Somno (talk) 11:35, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Timothy Leary, you will be blocked from editing. mms (talk) 11:37, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

I'm sorry, a friend visiting my house went on my computer and made the three March 8th edits using my account when I wasn't there. I am always logged in to Wikipedia so I didn't know he was doing this. I have spoken to him about it and I will be more careful about logging out of my account in the future. Kewp (t) 01:32, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
It did seem out of character with your other edits. Just make sure you keep your login safe. :) Somno (talk) 01:56, 18 March 2008 (UTC)