Talk:Kevin Dooley

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article must adhere to the policy on biographies of living persons. Controversial material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted or if there are other concerns relative to this policy, report it on the living persons biographies noticeboard.

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.	Biography Portal
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]
	This article is supported by the Arts and Entertainment work group.

Green Lantern had become stale and boring, despite the fact that the Green Lantern comics were best-sellers before he became the editor, after which the quality and sales began plummeting

This particular line is at odds with the Emerald Twilight write-up:

The editorial decision to shake up the Green Lantern series was eventually justified by revitalized sales and critical acclaim for the series.

So, which is it? Or, given the sheer animosity that Silver-age Green Lantern fans hold towards Dooley, is it even known one way or another? 156.34.221.174 17:54, 31 March 2006 (UTC)

Hal Jordan fans were the least of Dooley's troubles as an editor; his lack of competency is well-documented and, frankly, puzzling. Yet you have a good point. Claims about circulation numbers should at the very least have some clear source, so I am changing the article. Luis Dantas 10:40, 27 December 2006 (UTC)