User talk:Ketchup krew

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Note!

This page affords the opportunity to let off all the cursing that is commonly discouraged in Wikipedia discussion. NOT!!! So please keep it clean. If you want to swear and let your angers out by doing so, see the Screambox.

Image:Yakyakyak.gif

The Wikipedia Signpost
Volume 4, Issue 232008-06-02



Archives·Newsroom·Tip line·Single-page·Subscribe

[edit] Adoption

THanks for the awards. I would love to adopt you. - 224jeff6 TALK2ME 20:42, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

Woooooow... freaky! What happened? --Carerra 13:52, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

Oh thanks. I fixed it. I actually like the brick fire color for your signiture. Oh and since nobody gave you the big hello, here it is!!!


Hello, Ketchup krew! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking Image:Signature icon.png or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! MBisanzBot (talk) 15:23, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
Getting started
Getting help
Policies and guidelines

The community

Writing articles
Miscellaneous

--Carerra 14:15, 8 March 2008 (UTC)


[edit] Sockpuppetry case

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/224jeff6 for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. STORMTRACKER 94 Go Sox! 14:24, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

You lied to me the whole time, jeff. That is why "your brother" doesn't have a userpage! I am sick and disgusted! --Carerra 14:36, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

Ok, then how did you learn how to do a signiture code so quick? Nobody even gave you the welcome message. Amd what's your name then? Bob, joe, mike, chris? --Carerra 15:02, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] your application to the 42nd cabal

User:Pewwer42/cabal decline

sorry but its going to be that way until the sock puppet thing is cleared up. Tell me when it Is and I'll be glad to reconsider--Pewwer42  Talk  06:48, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] help me - Innapropriate handling of suspected sockpuppets?

I have been accused of sockpuppetry. Is it not permitted for the accuser to ask other users to provide evidence against the accusee? Please reply on my talkpage. -- Ketchup Krew Heinz 57! 19:33, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

Please clarify what you mean. DiligentTerrier and friends 19:38, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] 42

The Hidden Barnstar
This user has found Basketball110's secret hidden sub page! Can you find it?

Did you make it into the cabal? Basketball110 22:10, 12 March 2008 (UTC)


[edit] help me!

{{helpme|Can someone make a scrollbox on my userpage for my awards?}} -- Ketchup Krew Heinz 57! 23:28, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

Hi there! You can use the scroll box template to make scroll boxes - I'll leave it up to you to decide how you want it to look. Happy editing! Ale_Jrbtalk 00:04, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Ketchup ala Award

The Hidden Link Barnstar
This barnstar is awarded to Ketchup krew for finding the super secret hidden link on ComputerGuy890100's page!
Are you going to be next?

pUT THIS CODE IN YOUR aWARDS SECTION OR ON YOUR USERPAGE. tHANKS!

Code:{{User:ComputerGuy890100/HiddenLinkAward|Ketchup}}

ComputerGuy890100TalkPolls 23:48, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] GuestBook

Good Job finding my secret page but...You forgot to sign my guestbook! Please sign it. Click on Guest Book on this userbox:

I have a Guest Book. Please sign it if you have visited my userpage.

--RyRy5 (talk) 00:44, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Secret Page

Nope! Well done. You did it. Except you didn't. You haven't found my secret page - are you sure you were looking properly? Sorry...

Remember: It's all linked. There's at least three possible pages...

Hope to see you trying again,

microchip08 (find my secret page!) 17:35, 13 March 2008 (UTC)


P.S. Good Luck!

One more page to go... microchip08 (find my secret page!) 15:39, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
Warning Well done. You did it. Congratulations. You found my secret page. Feel free to give yourself a pat on the back, unless you didn't actually go through my links... and did it another way, in which case you may add yourself to the cheat list. Have you found all my "red herrings"?

Yours, microchip08 Find my secret page! Talk to me! I feel lonely! 20:52, 14 March 2008 (UTC)

Congratulations. I must now request that you give me some feedback about my quest, and that you add your barnstar so that other people can see it & have a go.... microchip08 Find my secret page! Talk to me! I feel lonely! 20:52, 14 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Screambox

Please don't make personal attacks against other editors on Screambox. I'm not being "politically correct", just simply "correct". What you are doing is not its purpose and the attacks are not welcome there or on any other Wikipedia page. I'm sorry you're stressed out. I suggest hitting the little "x" in the upper right corner of your monitor so as not to get yourself blocked. Or at least read the top half of Screambox so you can see what is acceptable there. Keeper | 76 | Disclaimer 19:33, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

No problem man, it looks like you're having a bad day. Been there. Screambox (which I co-created, therefore not politically correct), is supposed to make you feel better and help you regain your composure. However, if all it did was make you angrier, I recommend not editing screambox anymore. Cheers, Keeper | 76 | Disclaimer 19:40, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/224jeff6 block

See the above link. You've been blocked one week for disruptive editing. I strongly suggest the you take the time to learn wiki policies and abide by them. RlevseTalk 10:21, 19 March 2008 (UTC)


[edit] Unblock

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "I think I was blocked for something I didn't do. At first I was suspected as a sockpuppet of 224jeff6. But instead of that, I was blocked for making disruptive edits to my case page. On the page, the blocker, User:Rlevse, gave false information on in the conclusion section. He said that the most convincing thing is the edit 224jeff6 made when he was in the hospital. (You might need to read the sockpuppetry case to make complete of this.) No edits were made by 224jeff6 when he was in the hospital. I did, on my account, Ketchup krew. And the sockpuppet case listed me as the sockpuppetee and 224jeff6 as the master, but 224jeff6 was blocked for being the sockpuppetee. Also, my account didn't get a proper template to explain the block. And I don't even know what edit is being interpreted as beng disruptive. I was never told. I think this block was done all wrong. I really need an administrator to look this over. Also, account creation has been blocked. Is this permanent, or just for the length of the block?"


Decline reason: "You have been blocked for disruption for one week, and this seems to be justified and largely unrelated to the sockpuppet abuse case. Persons abusing multiple accounts are typically blocked indefinately, and the block notes that this 1-week block was for disruption and not sockpuppetry. Also, your question about creating new accounts during the block shows that you have clear intent to create a new account while blocked, i.e. to run an illegal sockpuppet account... — Jayron32.talk.contribs 03:12, 20 March 2008 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

Ketchup Krew Heinz 57! 19:53, 19 March 2008 (UTC)

Also, my userpage has been replaced with a sockpuppet suspect template. Will I ever be able to restore it (not the template but everything else that was there) or will I have to make it again? -- Ketchup Krew Heinz 57! 20:04, 19 March 2008 (UTC)

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "I think I was blocked for something I didn't do. At first I was suspected as a sockpuppet of 224jeff6. But instead of that, I was blocked for making disruptive edits to my case page. On the page, the blocker, User:Rlevse, gave false information on in the conclusion section. He said that the most convincing thing is the edit 224jeff6 made when he was in the hospital. (You might need to read the sockpuppetry case to make complete of this.) No edits were made by 224jeff6 when he was in the hospital. I did, on my account, Ketchup krew. And the sockpuppet case listed me as the sockpuppetee and 224jeff6 as the master, but 224jeff6 was blocked for being the sockpuppetee. Also, my account didn't get a proper template to explain the block. And I don't even know what edit is being interpreted as beng disruptive. I was never told. I think this block was done all wrong. I really need an administrator to look this over. Also, account creation has been blocked. Is this permanent, or just for the length of the block?"


Decline reason: "Your contributions suggest otherwise — Suspected Drunk Driver (talk) 00:10, 20 March 2008 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

Reviewing admin, see Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/224jeff6. If not socks, they're meats. RlevseTalk 21:34, 19 March 2008 (UTC)

I concur that this person is likely one in the same, BUT doesn't seem to have broken any rules, attempted to circumvent a block (if I missed that one please show me where because I didn't see that on the evidence page), or has been disruptive. Again, diffs to the contrary would be useful, but I do not feel this block has been properly placed (it is not against Wikipedia policy to have two accounts, per se). — BQZip01 — talk 01:35, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
You're missing the whole point about the disruption, see the first decline too. RlevseTalk 09:57, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
I believe you are missing my point. 224jeff6 was not blocked until this case (near as I can tell) and, therefore, this account was not being used to circumvent a block. Furthermore, I didn't see any disruptive behavior. I have requested diffs to show this alleged disruption, but have received no response, so, near as I can tell, this person has technically done nothing wrong even if he/she created a new account. — BQZip01 — talk 04:59, 21 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Picture

[edit] Copyright problems with Image:Talbot Tagora SX 81-83.jpg

An image that you uploaded, Image:Talbot Tagora SX 81-83.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Copyright problems because it is a suspected copyright violation. Please look there if you know that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), and then provide the necessary information there and on its page, if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. — Typ932T | C  17:37, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Signpost updated for April 7th and 14th, 2008.

Sorry, it seems that the bot quit before completing its run last week. Here is the last two weeks' worth of Signpost. Ralbot (talk) 08:29, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost
Weekly Delivery



Volume 4, Issue 15 7 April 2008 About the Signpost

April Fools' pranks result in temporary blocks for six admins WikiWorld: "Apples and oranges" 
News and notes: 100 x 5,000, milestones Wikipedia in the News 
Dispatches: Reviewers achieving excellence Features and admins 
Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News The Report on Lengthy Litigation 

Volume 4, Issue 16 14 April 2008 About the Signpost

From the editor 
Interview with the team behind one of the 2,000th featured articles Image placeholders debated 
WikiWorld: "Pet skunk" News and notes: Board meeting, milestones 
Wikipedia in the News Dispatches: Featured article milestone 
Features and admins Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News 
The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 08:29, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Signpost updated for April 21st, 2008.

The Wikipedia Signpost
Weekly Delivery



Volume 4, Issue 17 21 April 2008 About the Signpost

BLP deletion rules discussed amidst controversial AFD Threat made against high school on Wikipedia, student arrested 
Global login, blocking features developed WikiWorld: "Disruptive technology" 
News and notes: Wikimania security, German print Wikipedia, milestones Wikipedia in the News 
Dispatches: Monthly updates of styleguide and policy changes WikiProject Report: The Simpsons 
Features and admins Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News 
The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 17:00, 25 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Signpost updated for May 2nd and 9th, 2008.

The Wikipedia Signpost
Weekly Delivery



Volume 4, Issue 18 2 May 2008 About the Signpost

From the editor 
Wikimedia Board to expand, restructure Arbitrator leaves Wikipedia 
Bot approvals group, checkuser nominations briefly held on RfA WikiWorld: "World domination" 
News and notes: Board elections, milestones Wikipedia in the News 
Dispatches: Did You Know ... Features and admins 
Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News The Report on Lengthy Litigation 

Volume 4, Issue 19 9 May 2008 About the Signpost

Sister Projects Interview: Wikiversity WikiWorld: "They Might Be Giants" 
News and notes: Board elections, milestones Wikipedia in the News 
Dispatches: Featured content from schools and universities Features and admins 
Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News The Report on Lengthy Litigation 

Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 07:04, 10 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Signpost updated for May 12th, 2008.

The Wikipedia Signpost
Weekly Delivery



Volume 4, Issue 20 12 May 2008 About the Signpost

Explicit sexual content draws fire Sighted revisions introduced on the German Wikipedia 
Foundation receives copyright claim from church Board to update privacy policy, adopts data retention policy 
Update on Citizendium Board candidacies open through May 22 
Two wiki events held in San Francisco Bay Area New feature enables users to bypass IP blocks 
WikiWorld: "Tony Clifton" News and notes: Autoconfirmed level, milestones 
Wikipedia in the News Dispatches: Changes at Featured lists 
Features and admins Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News 
The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 10:13, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Signpost updated for May 19th and 26th, 2008.

The Wikipedia Signpost
Weekly Delivery



Volume 4, Issue 21 19 May 2008 About the Signpost

Pro-Israeli group's lobbying gets press, arbitration case Board elections: Voting information, new candidates 
Sister Projects Interview: Wikibooks WikiWorld: "Hodag" 
News and notes: Russian passes Swedish, milestones Wikipedia in the News 
Dispatches: Good article milestone Features and admins 
Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News The Report on Lengthy Litigation 

Volume 4, Issue 22 26 May 2008 About the Signpost

Board elections: Candidate questions Single User Login opt-in for all users 
Community-related news sources grow WikiWorld: "Tomcat and Bobcat" 
News and notes: Wikimedia DE lawsuit, milestones Wikipedia in the News 
Dispatches: Featured sounds Features and admins 
Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News The Report on Lengthy Litigation 

Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 07:58, 31 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Signpost updated for June 2, 2008.

The Wikipedia Signpost
Weekly Delivery



Volume 4, Issue 23 2 June 2008 About the Signpost

Board elections open WikiWorld: "Facial Hair" 
Wikipedia in the News Dispatches: Style guide and policy changes 
Features and admins Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News 
The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 08:18, 8 June 2008 (UTC)