User talk:Kernitou

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

w e l c o m e !

Contents

[edit] Vanity Fair's

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Vanity Fair’s 50 greatest films of all time, but we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. Perhaps you would like to rewrite the article in your own words. For more information about Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, take a look at our Five Pillars. Happy editing! Markyour words 22:49, 7 February 2006 (UTC)

(put on Mark's page:)
hello! obviously we do not have the same definition for "copyright violation" and i do not get why yours would be correcter than mine!!! the points are: (1) i did not take anything from the article (9 full pages, with comments for every movie) but the movie list (which would take, like, 1/2 page)! and (2) the little statistics below are mine (even if i needed like 2 minutes to compute them)! so thanks in advance to take the copyvio flag back Kernitou 23:16, 7 February 2006 (UTC)

The list is clearly the heart of the article, and copying it would be copyright infringement (see Harper & Row v. Nation Enterprises). Vanity Fair created the list and controls the copyright to it. It's up to them to decide whether they ever want to publish it again, and if so, when and where they want it published. I have deleted your attempt to recreate the list on a user page. Do not do this again. --Michael Snow 17:29, 28 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Lien vers votre page sur fr.wikipedia.org

Bonjour, je me suis permis d'ajouter la syntaxe correcte vers votre page sur http://fr.wikipedia.org, libre à vous de la garder ou pas. Amitiés--Khalid hassani 16:10, 6 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] NUMB3RS vs. Numb3rs

Kernitou, please calm down. You've renamed the NUMB3RS page to Numb3rs three times now, and each time it's been renamed back to NUMB3RS. This shows that there's enough disagreement to talk about it before making a final decision either way. (Note that personally, I don't mind either title.) Regardless of whether TV.com and IMDB use the capitalised or uncapitalised version, we should use whichever one is used by the TV show itself. The ultimate word on that will come from the show's creators, which LadyShelley (talk · contribs) says she has contacted to ask directly. While we are waiting to hear back from them, feel free to continue discussing the name on the talk page, but please do not rename the page again until a decision has been reached by the community. Mike Peel 15:58, 8 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Santana album 1969.jpg‎

If you don't add a fair use rationale for this image, it is likely to be deleted. Here are the handy templates: {{Album cover fur}}, {{Non-free album cover}}. Usually, both are needed.

Edit Image:Pink_Floyd-Animals-Frontal-300.jpg if you need a quick example of how to fill in {{Album cover fur}}. / edg ☺ ★ 20:01, 1 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] question : image

thanks for your message - - - i've seen there are 100000000s of album covers with the simple "fair use box"... you mean i have to make the "fur" as well for, for instance, Image:Phillips Michelle Victim.jpg ? kernitou talk 20:10, 1 October 2007 (UTC)

Image:Phillips Michelle Victim.jpg could use one as well. The only exceptions would be art that is free use (or otherwise GFDL-compatible), which practically no album covers are. Wikipedia is enforcing non-free content rules more strictly now that it did a year ago. Legally this is understandable and necessary, but it has caused much frustration for image uploaders.
For other non-free images (musician promo photos, for instance), use {{Non-free media rationale}}. (example) / edg ☺ ★ 21:50, 1 October 2007 (UTC)

santana : done kernitou talk 20:19, 1 October 2007 (UTC)

Good FUR. There is a possible second problem with the Santana cover.
Album covers greater than 315px longest @ 72dpi are considered more than is needed for fair use, and may be deleted. Some discussion of this is on Wikipedia talk:Non-free content/Archive 26#Need_guidance_on_WP:NFCC.233b. This is especially a concern for album covers because anything big enough to be printed out for a satisfactory-looking CD cover can be claimed to aid piracy, and the record industry is famously litigious. I degraded a bunch of Pink Floyd album covers to address exactly that concern — an item was [tagged for deletion simply for being too big.
Having to do this sucks of course, but since the Santana image has been tagged for deletion once, it's probably in someone's watchlist. In the event it gets tagged for size, I have some instructions on Image:Pinkfloyd_50.jpg#Resolution_degrade.
Sincere thanks for your contributions. / edg ☺ ★ 21:50, 1 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Fail use images in user space

Hello. I noticed that you user page and subpages contain copyrighted images that do not have a free licence. Please review WP:USER#Images on user pages; fair-use images are not allowed to be displayed in user space (but you may link to them by putting a colon (:) in front of the link). Please remove the images form you user page and subpages. Thank you. — Edokter • Talk • 10:50, 5 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image list

Hello, I added an answer at your question on the Help Desk which you might find useful , you can find it at Wikipedia:Help desk#special all pages for images ?. Thank you. Martial BACQUET 13:21, 10 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Orphaned non-free media (Image:Grand Funk Railroad We're An American Band.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Grand Funk Railroad We're An American Band.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 18:07, 10 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Orphaned non-free media (Image:Ange emile.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Ange emile.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. βcommand 22:22, 11 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Warnings

Note: Always remember to substitute user warning templates. For help on user warnings, see the WikiProject on User Warnings.
Older warnings may have been deleted, but are still visible in the page history.
[Admin: block | unblock / Info: contribs | interiot's tool | page moves | block log | block list]

[edit] October 2007

  1. User:Kernitou/FaVoriteCDs was deleted because it was a gallery of copyrighted images in the User domain. Please do not place any more copyrighted images on your user page. Thank you Papa November 18:58, 13 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Special:Imagelist

thanks for your help - i wrote it back on my page - kernitou talk 07:16, 15 October 2007 (UTC)

You're welcome ;) Martial BACQUET 07:56, 15 October 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Ange caricatures.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Ange caricatures.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 12:59, 5 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Porcupine Tree logo

You and I seem to be at odds over the issue of whether or not this band logo should be kept on the Porcupine Tree article. I'd like to propose that we mediate the matter on the talk page of the article rather than continue to be at odds over it through a long and drawn-out series of revert-rebuttals. Kerrow (talk) 03:34, 21 November 2007 (UTC)

  • I've started a discussion here, just to save you some time. Kerrow (talk) 03:39, 21 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Participation in Articles for Deletion debates

Thanks for participating, but your comment "keep - that's the very point of wiki" that appeared in several AfD debates is completely invalid as AfD is not a vote - you need to provide reasons for what you think should be done with an article based on Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Also, "wiki" is not short for "Wikipedia". Please also read WP:ATA, WP:NOT, WP:N, WP:V and WP:NOR.--h i s s p a c e r e s e a r c h 11:25, 3 December 2007 (UTC)

I was coming here to point out the same thing, please read and equate yourself with policy if you wish to participate in discussions. Ridernyc 22:58, 3 December 2007 (UTC)