Talk:Kerry and Kay Danes
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Souce of information
From Talk:Kerry and Kay Danes/Comments The information on this article was derived from my contact with the Australian Government and the Danes Lawyer. The information was forwarded to me as titled:
LEGAL SUBMISSION of DANES CASE PREPARED ON 12 FEBRUARY 2002 BY THE AUSTRALIAN LAW FIRM REPRESENTING KERRY AND KAY DANES
Sunnyroe 00:40, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
- Please note wikipedia policy WP:NOR and the guidleine WP:COI both of which are not met in my view for this contributer's contributions to the article. Hence I have removed the material.--Golden Wattle talk 23:32, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
Golden Wattle obviously prefers to perpetuate propaganda and cares nothing for the complexities of the Danes case, nor does he have any understanding of the case, yet feels authoritive enough to report on it. Golden Wattle does not have access to the documentation provided by the Australian Government so all postings should be considered purely speculative.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.134.13.194 (talk • contribs) 19:51, 17 November 2007
- This is an encyclopaedia not a soap box - please read the fundamental policy pertaining to this web site. I have cited sources that meet our guidelines on reliable sources. I have removed original research (refer policy on no original research) based on unpublished sources which are apparently available to the anon contributer from IP 203.134.13.194 and / or User:Sunnyroe. These editor(s) need to note our policies also on conflict of interest . I do not think that the present article is particularly good but I don't think it shows much bias either way. Of course one must quote the Laotian government comments on the case - that doesn't mean sympathy with their views - let the reader decide. Should readers with a conflict of interest wish to contribute, it is preferred that they do not edit the article directly but place information or comments on this talk page for other disinterested editors to add into the article per our policy. --Golden Wattle talk 23:45, 17 November 2007 (UTC)