From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Greece, an attempt to expand, improve and standardize the content and structure of articles related to Greece. |
| If you would like to participate, you can improve Keramoti, or sign up and contribute in a wider array of articles like those on our to do list. If you have any questions, please consult the FAQ. |
| Stub |
This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the quality scale. (comments) |
| Low |
This article has been rated as a Low priority article |
| Additional information: |
|
|
|
|
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-Class status:
 Referencing and citation: not checked- Coverage and accuracy: not checked
- Structure: not checked
- Grammar: not checked
- Supporting materials: not checked
|
|
[edit] unreliable and biased source used
The source that was used is a highly biased and nationalist source. (Simovski) In Lithoksou list http://www.freewebs.com/onoma/met.htm the Slavic name doesn’t appear at all. What apears as Slavic is actually a Turkish alternative of the Greek original. Unless a credible source appears I will deleted the source and the name. Seleukosa (talk) 21:51, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
- The fact that the Slavic name was also the Turkish one is no reason to delete. Your selective deletions are disruptive and indicative of a POV-push. Since most of these articles about villages and towns in Greece have NO SOURCES WHATSOEVER, the fact that the only thing you delete is the prior names is proof positive of a POV push rather than a betterment of the encyclopedia. You call the sourcing biased and unreliable: do you have a source contradicting Simovski, e.g., showing that the Slavs DID NOT use the Turkish name for this place? You regard Lithoksou as a reliable source, so any reversions contrary to that source would appear to be vandalism. In any event, Lithoksou is one source but not the only on the matters here. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 02:32, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
