User talk:Keodrah

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Dimitri Spanoa on Surrealism

Hi, I've removed (twice) your inclusion of information about "Dimitri Spanoa" on Surrealism, and have included an explanatory entry on the article's talk page. If you would like to ask any questions about appropriate content for Surrealism, I invite you to do so on the talk page. Thanks! - Docether 20:44, 15 May 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for your note. If you want to leave a message or comment for another user, you'd normally edit their "discussion" page. For example, my user page is User:Docether while my talk page is User_talk:Docether. Starting a new thread on a user's talk page is as easy as clicking on the "+" tab at the top of the talk page. You can also sign your comments with ~~~~, which will give you a "signature" like this : "Docether 13:40, 16 May 2006 (UTC)". In any case, if you're interested in contributing more to Wikipedia, I recommend looking at the following pages :

    • Wikipedia:Introduction (an intro to Wikipedia and its goals)
    • Wikipedia:Tutorial (a tutorial to help you get more familiar with editing Wikipedia)
    • Wikipedia:Guidelines (an exhaustive set of helpful guidelines for editing articles)

Good luck! Docether 13:40, 16 May 2006 (UTC)

Wikipedia is an encyclopaedia, the bands which you are trying to promote are non notable and fail to meet Wikiepdia music standard, and I presume you are in one of these bands making it vanity as well.

Post goth is a non notable neologism not an actual genre of music, the article was used purely to promote your MySpace band. - Deathrocker 01:15, 18 May 2006 (UTC)

Ditto "gothitech". If you look at WP:NEO, which stems from WP:OR, it may give you a better sense of what articles and contributions to articles are appropriate for Wikipedia, and why we are concerned about issues like "notability" and neologisms. WP:NOT is also a great resource for rules of thumb regarding what types of things shouldn't be made into articles. Thanks, Docether 18:46, 18 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Recent edits

Surely you can see by looking at the many deletion discussions that the material on Dimitri Spanoa and the other related articles will soon be removed. It really won't help matters by continuing to insert links into articles like Moth. Joyous! | Talk 00:05, 22 May 2006 (UTC)

Don't bite my head off dude, all I did was change the name from "Moth (writer" to "Moth (writer)". Though I do have to point out, that nothing linked to your page, and there were no citations.--DCAnderson 00:13, 22 May 2006 (UTC)

Yes but you put a page on the moth writer page as calls for speedy deletion...your harrasing me. Why don't you try visiting who and what Dimitri is all about before censoring him...—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Keodrah (talk • contribs) .

Why don't you try citing your sources before harrasing me.--DCAnderson 00:26, 22 May 2006 (UTC)