User talk:KENTUCKYCHILDNOW

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Notability of Kentucky child now

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Kentucky child now, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Kentucky child now seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Kentucky child now, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. CSDWarnBot 20:31, 15 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Kentucky Child Now

Hello. Regarding your page on Kentuckychildnow, I believe you intended the information on the talk page for the article space. I have moved it to Kentucky Child Now and am attempting to source it per Wikipedia's sourcing requirements to help verify its notability. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 21:04, 15 October 2007 (UTC)

I have added external sources to the best of my ability and incorporated references found at a variety of other locations. Please feel free to include more or better sources if these can be located to further substantiate notability. Note that I did have to revise the information on the organization. Perhaps the reason you did not include it in the article space is because it followed too closely the text of its source. Wikipedia, of course, can't use text taken directly from other websites for copyright reasons, but such material cannot be placed on talk pages, either. Anyway, good luck with developing the article. Please be careful, given your evident connection to the organization, to avoid conflict of interest edits in the text. And contact me at my talk page if I may be of any further assistance. :) --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 22:20, 15 October 2007 (UTC)