Talk:Kent Falcons

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	Kent Portal This article is within the scope of the Kent WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to the county of Kent in South East England. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.
Stub	This article has been rated as stub-Class on the assessment scale. (If you rated the article please give a short summary at comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article.)
Low	This article is on a subject of low-importance for Kent-related articles.
Article Grading: The article has been rated for quality and/or importance but has no comments yet. If appropriate, please review the article and then leave comments here to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article and what work it will need. WikiProject Kent tasks: Kent WikiProject and Portal Here are some Kent related tasks you can do: Focus (top priority) articles: Kent Refine/polish: Ashford Expand: List of Members of Parliament in Kent, Betsom's Hill .More... NPOV: .More... Citation needed: See Kent Citations needed .More... Cleanup/Copyedit: Kingdom of Kent .More... Expert attention: Merge/Split: .More... Wikify: .More... Stubs: See Kent geography stubs articles (merge?), .More... Requests: Government of Kent, Sport in Kent, Culture in Kent, List of fire stations in Kent .More... Other issues: Collaborate: .More... See also: Kent pages needing attention Note: These articles may overlap with those on other related lists. If you would like to make a change, either do so yourself, or make a suggestion. view • edit • discuss • history • watch

[edit] Speedy Deletion

I am contesting this nomination for speedy deletion. Please see the AfD discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Surrey Stingers, where a similar situation arose with a BCAFL team and the Afd was handily defeated. Also, it seems that the teams getting tagged are those that are either new additions to BCAFL (and hence, no established history in the league), or have not been consistantly winning clubs. Since all teams are co-equal members of the whole (which is obviously relevant and not deletion-worthy, as well as it's more established members), it seems inequitable to single out a few from that whole. Thanks. - Masonpatriot 03:32, 15 May 2007 (UTC)

Agreed. Not deleted. Kafziel ^Talk 12:26, 15 May 2007 (UTC)