Talk:Kelly Madison
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Free images contributed
The following images were contributed with a GFDL license pursuant to a WP:ERP request. I've placed a couple on the article, I'll leave the rest here for other editors to decide use. (They will moved to the Commons once the OTRS ticket is processed.) Videmus Omnia Talk 05:00, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Photos
Is it really necessary to have a gallery of photos in the article. I would think that one good one should suffice, and any more is just over-kill. 24.68.249.197 22:19, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
- That's completely up to the consensus of the editors working the article...the images are free so we can do what we want with them. Videmus Omnia Talk 22:32, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
- In my opinion, the photo to text ratio should be fixed by adding text rather than removing photos. Epbr123 22:33, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
- Agree with both opinions. In other words, adding text is certainly preferable, but we don't need a gallery. Photos should be used to illustrate key points of the article. "What she looks like" is a key point of the article, but only takes 1 photo. With more text, there are more points to illustrate. --AnonEMouse (squeak) 11:50, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
- These photos are all watermarked with kellymadison.com's logo and are therefore unfit for Wikipedia use. wikipediatrix 19:19, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
- Some, but not all, are watermarked. And if Videmus Omnia is right, the photos were passed along with an explicit understanding that they'll be uploaded under the GFDL, which means if we want to use a specific image, we can freely crop the watermarks out so long as we make sure we note the change we made. Tabercil 22:29, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
- These photos are all watermarked with kellymadison.com's logo and are therefore unfit for Wikipedia use. wikipediatrix 19:19, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
- Agree with both opinions. In other words, adding text is certainly preferable, but we don't need a gallery. Photos should be used to illustrate key points of the article. "What she looks like" is a key point of the article, but only takes 1 photo. With more text, there are more points to illustrate. --AnonEMouse (squeak) 11:50, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
- In my opinion, the photo to text ratio should be fixed by adding text rather than removing photos. Epbr123 22:33, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Carmella Bing
I saw Kelly in a porno with Carmella Bing and noticed she has no wikipedia page. If someone knows a bit about Carmella could u make a page. And iv seen Carmella in her own porn so its not just a 1 off, she is a porn star. --Metal to the Max! 12:01, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
Hello from Spain. I make the article of Carmella Bing in the spanish wikipedia [1] It's so easy make an article of him in english, because all of information about Carmella is in this languague. Was a big surprise for me, because i didn't found the article of him in english. Sorry about my bad english. 1:56, 25 November 2007
- ok first of all buddy, the Carmella Bing im talking about is a chick. A her not a him. so i think you might be mixed up or your english is kinda bad. --Metal to the Max! 07:43, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
- It's been established that Carmella Bing fails to meet WP:N, and has been protected to prevent creation after multiple deletions. As for this article, I'm impressed with the citations. No way that this will ever have to go through AfD again.---h i s s p a c e r e s e a r c h 23:19, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
What's the heck!!! People edit articles episodes of TV series and even characters of theses series and we can't create an article about a pornstar!Mitch1981 (talk) 18:35, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
Seems like she has left the industry or at least decided to go it solo now, so she might become more famous in her endeavours outside of hired modelling (which is what has made her "non-notable"). Will be interesting to see if she sets up her own production company or otherwise, this would probably warrant a Wiki page for her. Steve355 (talk) 13:34, 14 April 2008 (UTC)