Talk:Kellogg-Briand Pact

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.
Start	This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale.
Additional information and associated task forces: This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-Class status: Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: criterion met Grammar: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion not met This article is not currently associated with a task force. To tag it for one or more task forces, please add the task force codes from the template instructions to the template call.

---

Actually it didn't. In neither case did the invading power actually annex the occupied country and in both cases one the invader went through a lot of explanation to justify its action.

This interdiction has been repeatedly by many countries, including USSR (for example invasion of Hungary) and United States (for example invasion of Grenada).

---

I have added the 2003 invasion of Iraq, since from a technical stand point (as well as statements by the US Department of State as well as the United Nations) it is in clear violation of the pact.--The Singularity 15:52, 27 August 2005 (UTC)

69.121.126.6 23:08, 27 February 2007 (UTC) I'm doing a project and I'm in the 8th grade........I'm guessing this is not in affect. Would I be correct? 69.121.126.6 23:08, 27 February 2007 (UTC)

Contents 1 The Introduction 2 Where was it really signed? 3 What's the difference? 4 Invasion of Poland

[edit] The Introduction

It's somewhat poorly worded and confusing. Kellogg was indifferent to a pact that renounces war, then he makes a pact to renounce war? It seems like the author may not have understood the meaning of the word indifferent? Konamaiki 04:00, 18 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Where was it really signed?

Article calls it the pact of Paris, afte the city in which it was signed on 27 August 1928, then later "After negotiations, it was signed in London August 27, 1928". Anything to back up the latter?Ectoplasmical 01:38, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] What's the difference?

A year before, Poland proposed declaration of renounciation of war in League of Nation. WHat' the difference between Polish proposal a year before, and Briand-Kelogg pact, except that the latter ostensibly ignored LN, undermining its position and authority? Szopen (talk) 09:18, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

I vaguely remember reading about it. Perhaps we should write more about it... when and by whom was this Polish proposal presented? --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk} 07:09, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Invasion of Poland

Wouldn't this be considered a successful use of the treaty since France and the UK declared war on Germany for invading Poland.

Nope, because France and UK decalred war from totally different reasons (hint: we were allies) Szopen (talk) 14:13, 30 April 2008 (UTC)