User talk:Keimzelle

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, Keimzelle, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  --Viriditas | Talk 09:42, 26 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] Terri Schiavo

Aloha. Can you point me in the general direction of the content that was removed from Terri Schiavo? If you take a look at the history, you'll find the version which contains the content you want to add back into the article. --Viriditas | Talk 09:47, 26 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Thanks, I've added most of it back in. If you have any further suggestions, let me know, or just edit the page. --Viriditas | Talk 19:24, 26 Mar 2005 (UTC)

[edit] User:Mlorrey

I've noticed you've interacted with Mlorrey on a few pages. I've filed a request for comment against him and I was hoping you would certify the dispute. Thanks very much, Meelar (talk) 21:26, May 26, 2005 (UTC)

[edit] == Eine seltsame Anfrage... ==

Hallo Marcika,

eine Kollegin von mir sucht die Adresse einer ungarischen Kollegin, und eben... sie weiss ihren exakten Namen nicht mehr - und so findet sie auf www.matav.hu ihre Budapester Adresse auch nicht. Kennst du vielleicht die "richtige" Schreibweise vom Familiennamen "Hustiesz"? :-)

Machs gut und lieber Gruss, --Keimzelle 08:00, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Ich kenne sie leider nicht - der Name klingt keinem der häufigeren ungarischen Familiennamen ähnlich. Ich habe einige plausible Varianten (Húsztíz, Húsztísz, Hústísz, Hústíz...) bei matav.hu ausprobiert, habe aber leider auch nichts gefunden. Sorry. -- Marcika 09:15, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Caffeine and Sleep

Thank you for your addition to the main sleep page. However, is there any way you could provide a link to an article in english with regard to your information about sleep in the elderly? Making a claim on an english version of wiki and then providing the evidence for the claim in another language does not fit the guidelines of Wikipedia. Because it is in german, most of the readers will not be able to discern if the source is reputable/factual (a peer reviewed scientific journal), or someone's opinion (blog).

[edit] While not used in hospitals in the United States, it seems it is commonly used in Germany and Switzerland.

Please give a peer-reviewed verifiable source fot this statement. The one referred to (in German) seems to be a personal opinion, i.e., without any reference. Jclerman 17:34, 9 October 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Lost in translation

On 13 October 2005, user 80.129.140.252 has indicated in an edit to the sleep article: "(→Notes - 'german 'RR' is Riva-Rocci (method of measuring blood pressure, used as synonym with blood pressure, not respiratory resistance!))'". See result of a web search in the discussion page of the sleep article. Jclerman 02:33, 23 October 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Swiss vs Swissair

Thanks for noticing my mistake and reverting back to the correct image. I didn't notice the difference :) I was in switzerland for 10 days starting on september 23rd.. wonderful country. sikander 22:21, 22 October 2005 (UTC)


[edit] Procrastination article

I need your help on the talk page for the procrastination article. Some guy (pianoman) is trying to pull in a mediator in order to remove your expectancy value theory section, along with most of my contributions. Help! Go for it! 10:38, 9 December 2005 (UTC)

Thank you for your message. I hate it when people remove things I wrote... and I don't even get a discussion about the merits of trimming the "theories" section. It's just deleted... What should I do? Is a mediator a danger for our article version? Or do the actions of a mediator just put a stop to pianoman's intentions? --Keimzelle 09:48, 10 December 2005 (UTC)

A mediator is called in when there's a tie, usually in a one-on-one dispute, inorder to break the tie and thereby "reach a consensus". If you come and join the discussion, then it will no longer be one-on-one, which will remove the need for a mediator (I think). So, all you need to do is answer the posts on talk:procrastination and express your opinion. Almost everything on Wikipedia is done by consensus, following whatever the majority decides. Go for it! 18:38, 10 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Procrastination article is now in imminent danger

I don't think you understood my previous request. You need to make your vote known on Talk:Procrastination. Pianoman has recruited another user to side with him, so now it is 2 vs 1 (them vs me). You didn't make your desires known, so you aren't currently being counted in the dispute. They have voted for Transwiki'ing the article off of Wikipedia. If you don't want that to happen, you need to go to the talk page right away and let them know loud and clear. Go for it! 13:17, 28 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] I'm thinking about going for adminship, and seek your advice

Hi Keimzelle,

I'm thinking about requesting adminship, and have written a draft of my request. I would appreciate it if you would proofread it for me, and let me know what you think. (Thanks for your help on the procrastination article). --Go for it! 23:28, 18 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Voting in Switzerland

Hi, you asked for someone to check your language in the voting Switzerland article. I edited and fixed some typos and made some suggestions. Overall great article. Hope you find my edits usefulHdstubbs 05:53, 29 January 2006 (UTC)

Now I feel bad about ticking off an experienced editor :-). I concur with Hdstubbs, very interesting article. --Malthusian (talk) 12:10, 1 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Stratcon

Yes, I have a copy. I think you can still buy it from Delta Tao.[1] Brainhell 20:41, 20 February 2006 (UTC)

I hope they have 3.0 too. Or try eBay. I like the artillary and helicopter units in 4.0 because they help clear out those annoying fleets. But 3.0 has a better look and feel. Brainhell 18:14, 25 February 2006 (UTC)

I downloaded 2.0 from the new link to the StratCon page. One MAJOR advantage in 3.0 is the ability to use the keypad to move units, not just the mouse. 4.0 doesn't have a better AI. It's true that it's less crip visually. But the helicopters are very effective against ground units, anf conserving them adds a challenge. Plus, using artillery to blaast the computer's fleets is satisfying. Brainhell 17:53, 26 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Notice

The Community Portal was recently reverted to a version that appeared months ago. Therefore, I've called for a vote to restore to the Community Portal the version that had developed there up until that reversion. There are three drafts competing for the privilege, each representing entirely different approaches, including the current revert version. To show your support for which design should be displayed as the Community Portal, VOTE HERE. Sincerely, --Go for it! 18:14, 3 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Xanadu

Hi, I've just reverted your edit to Xanadu - the Citizen Kave stuff is one of the (many) entries on the dabpage: Xanadu (disambiguation). Thanks/wangi 14:57, 22 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] From Russia With Love

According to this site, the helicopter in the movie is a one-of-a-kind ("one-off"). But according to the registration number "N780ND" it is a Hiller UH-12C. (Born2flie 03:20, 12 October 2006 (UTC))

[edit] Black Sun (Star Wars)

Another editor has added the {{prod}} template to the article Black Sun (Star Wars), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 04:59, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Black Sun (Star Wars)

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Black Sun (Star Wars), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? --EEMIV (talk) 04:06, 28 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] AfD nomination of Black Sun (Star Wars)

I have nominated Black Sun (Star Wars), an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Black Sun (Star Wars). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? --EEMIV (talk) 20:14, 28 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] AfD nomination of Black Sun (Star Wars)

I have nominated Black Sun (Star Wars), an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Black Sun (Star Wars) (2nd nomination). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? • Gene93k (talk) 20:15, 28 April 2008 (UTC)