Talk:Keisha Evans

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article must adhere to the policy on biographies of living persons. Controversial material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted or if there are other concerns relative to this policy, report it on the living persons biographies noticeboard.

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.	Biography Portal
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]
	This article is supported by the Arts and Entertainment work group.

	Pornography Portal This article is part of WikiProject Pornography, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to pornography-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
Stub	This article has been rated as stub-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Contents 1 ??? = 2 Inappropriate picture 3 Bust measurement 4 Violations

[edit]  ??? =

What. the. fuck?--Dess 03:50, 7 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Inappropriate picture

While I don't mind the picture here, I'm sure MANY people wouldn't like it, as it is blatantly sexual. Someone, please find a better, less provocative one. DanPMK 03:12, 19 July 2006 (UTC)

Wikipedia is not censored. —Disavian (^talk/_contribs) 00:01, 1 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Bust measurement

This article says 50 in (127 cm), but on her website's bio page she says she has a 56½ in (144 cm) bust and a 26 in (66 cm) ribcage. I'm using a less accurate conversion on purpose, since ½ in (1.27 cm) > 1 cm --Anshelm '77 18:29, 10 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Violations

This article violates the wikipedia guidelines. Wikipedia is not for promotional purposes.
Further, all editing has been done without support from sources.
Forums are for banter and arguments. Wikipedia is for information.
In addition to the ridiculous nature in novelty of the subject, these violations call for this article to either be restricted or erased. DiogenesX 01:59, 9 February 2007 (UTC)