Talk:KDE

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the KDE article.

Article policies
Archives: 1, 2, 3
Good article KDE has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can delist it, or ask for a reassessment.
September 15, 2006 Good article nominee Listed
To-do list for KDE:

Contents

[edit] Create/Expand pakages' sub-pages

  • kdeutils - Utilities. <- Why is this is an internal loop back to main article?
  • kdewebdev - Web Development.
  • koffice - Office suite.
  • kdebindings - Support for other programming languages
This article is part of the Linux WikiProject, a group of Wikipedians interested in improving the encyclopaedic coverage of articles relating to Linux, and who are involved in developing and proposing standards for their content, presentation and other aspects.
If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.
Good article GA This article has been rated as GA-Class on the quality scale.
This article is part of WikiProject Free Software, an effort to create, expand, organize, and improve free software-related articles.
Good article GA rated as GA-Class on the assessment scale
High rated as high-importance on the assessment scale


[edit] Talk archived

Talk page was getting difficult to follow and people were adding comments to sections which had been dead for three years. I've split the archives up into three sections: early commentary, a huge licensing flame war and later comments. Chris Cunningham 09:50, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Icon designer

The designer for the KDE icon was David Vignoni. I don't know where to include this in this article; perhaps someone else has a better idea. Stwalkerster 17:40, 29 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Made TimeLine into a table

Put the timeline section into a table, looks neater in my opinion. feel free to change it back if you disagree.

Also I've put it on the Linux WikiProject page but I might as well put it here as well... We need a separate wikiproject for KDE and GNOME, anyone willing to start one or participate should reply to this or the aforementioned Linux project talk page.

[edit] History

Was KDE developed Specifically to replace CDE? The history on kde.org seems to sidestep the question, and I'm sure for good corporate relations they would not want to advertise that KDE is built on the failures of CDE. But the name KDE suggests that its a CDE replacement and I think a neutral Wikipedia article should cite sources confirming or denying the original intent here. Cuvtixo 16:27, 25 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] please could somebody answer this b4 it is deleted?

Is this an operating system of do i need to download unix as well? thanks

It's not an operating system. Here you find OS's shipping KDE —Preceding unsigned comment added by Momet (talkcontribs) 15:05, 2 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] SimpleKDE

SimpleKDE? http://www.simplekde.org/node/7/default.htm -- Writtenonsand 00:49, 16 November 2007 (UTC)

What about it? NeoChaosX (talk, walk) 04:41, 16 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Some reorganization is needed, badly

KDE 4 is out, but we should reorganize the KDE article instead of updating. I believe we should have the main article provide general information, history, and blurbs about present and past releases and have separate articles that are more in depth for KDE 3 and KDE 4 (Keep the current KDE 4 article, make a KDE 3 article). Articles with now outdated KDE 3 tech should be given a last update and programs in KDE 4 should have an update with new screenshots and icons. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Skeith (talkcontribs) 00:51, 12 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Licensing-issues

Is it just me, or is the part about "licensing-issues" forced and arbitary? It seems like someone went out of their way to mention that point? Also, it contains claims that are somewhat unsubstantiated, like the claim that commercial apps usually use GTK+ instead of Qt. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.30.176.84 (talk) 15:56, 1 April 2008 (UTC)