User talk:Kdaly100

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Please leave a new message.

Contents

[edit] GAA player infoboxes

From your user page Learn how to do those bloody infoboxes for GAA players :-O What problems are you having maybe i can help (Gnevin 16:48, 30 November 2006 (UTC))

thanks - its the shirt colors - I know all the RGB stuff and I suppose if I sat down on the sandbox for half an hour I would work it out. Also do you think every GAA player should have a player infobox as in some (most) case the depth of information is not great until they actually produce an autobigraphy/biography.
Yes they all should have the either {{infobox GAA player}} or {{infobox GAA dualplayer}}. As for lack of infomation i agree certain infomation such as scores apps are hard to come by but even without this the infobox allows unfamiliar person a quick overview of the player .
As for the shirt colour it is very hit and miss but Web colours can be useful (Gnevin 17:04, 30 November 2006 (UTC))
ps Template_talk:Infobox_GAA_player and Template_talk:Infobox_GAA_dualplayer both give an overview of usage (Gnevin 17:06, 30 November 2006 (UTC))
Thanks - I have given Larry Tompkins the treatment.... BustOut 21:18, 30 November 2006 (UTC) Will plug away with a many GAA players as I can possibly sufficient information on.

[edit] Billy Morgan

Hi. I'm glad that you liked the changes I made to the Billy Morgan article. Been meaning to get around to it for a while. The reason you can't see the history section is because I redirected the whole article from Billy Morgan (footballer) to Billy Morgan (Gaelic footballer). There's already an article about another Billy Morgan who was a footballer in England in the early 1900s I think. CorkMan 11:33, 28 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Speedy delete

A tag has been placed on Canon Michael O'Brien, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Useless article with no encyclopedic content, bad spelling and grammar.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet very basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Dreamy \*/!$! 14:26, 17 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Speedy

Hi. When you tag articles for speedy deletion, please do not remove the content or move it to the talk page. The content should be left in place. Cheers TigerShark 23:17, 7 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Dundee and Arbroath Railway

Hi - I have done some work on Dundee and Arbroath Railway over the past few days and thought that you (I spotted your name associated with this type of work) might be interested in looking and doing some edits on it. --BustOut 14:41, 10 September 2007 (UTC)

Had a quick look this evening, this is a great start. I have applied the layout I have used for others. The main item that will need adding is the route map template. I will think about this over the next few days. OTher bits will have to wait until I return from a business trip and can look at my reference books. --Stewart (talk) 19:58, 10 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] AfD nomination of Casey Hughes and Maddie Coleman

An article that you have been involved in editing, Casey Hughes and Maddie Coleman, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Casey Hughes and Maddie Coleman. Thank you. Carlossuarez46 21:15, 14 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Kevin Kimberlin Notability

This is the first post I have created and it has been updated to be better aligned with wiki notability standards. Can you please advise if the standards have been met in your eyes?

--Seyoda 18:15, 17 September 2007 (UTC)

Hi - Please don't remove the notability tag just yet for the following reasons. I have put it back but also a stub tag (not sure if that is OK but it covers both bases). The tag isn't bad as such it just looks for help. I have also made what I think are some helpful edits to start you along your way.
  • You should at least add some external links to validate the topic you have written.
  • As you were the original author you could be Kevin Kimberlin (grin) so it is best to leave the tag there so other Wikipedians can help out and perhaps enhance the article
  • Have a look at other articles on people to get some ideas as to what a good

Good Luck !!! BustOut 18:53, 17 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Cliff Richard Always Guaranteed.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Cliff Richard Always Guaranteed.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:50, 27 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Proposed deletion of Roger Charlton

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Roger Charlton, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? -- Andrew Mill (talk) 12:37, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Speedy deletion nomination of Maurizio Valtieri

Hello, Kdaly100. Thanks for keeping an eye out on article quality. I'm dropping you a note to let you know that I have removed the speedy deletion template that you placed on Maurizio Valtieri because the tag does not fit the speedy deletion criteria. While articles in other languages may be subject to speedy deletion if they are copies of articles from the Wiki in that foreign language (see WP:CSD#A2), otherwise they are tagged for translation by placing {{notenglish}} on them and following the template's instructions to list them at Wikipedia:Pages needing translation into English. The volunteers there help us to determine if the contents meet guidelines.

As a general note, I noticed that when you placed the deletion tag on this article and on the now deleted Tyler McGaughey, you did not warn the article's creators. The deletion templates expand on the pages to include a section to be pasted on the creator's page. This lets the creator know why his or her article has been deleted and may help them to avoid creating inappropriate pages in the future. Please take an extra minute or two when templating pages for deletion to copy that notice onto the creator page. Thank you, and thanks again for keeping an eye out on article quality. If you'd like to talk about this, feel free to contact me at my page. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 13:27, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Notability of Lights.Action!(band)

A tag has been placed on Lights.Action!(band) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. JohnCD (talk) 13:34, 16 May 2008 (UTC)