User talk:Kat7202

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Royal District Nursing Service

A tag has been placed on Royal District Nursing Service, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the article and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Kannie | talk 03:44, 4 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Speedy deletion of Royal District Nursing Service

A tag has been placed on Royal District Nursing Service, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read our the guidelines on spam as well as the Wikipedia:Business' FAQ for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. SmashvilleBONK! 04:32, 4 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] January 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove speedy deletion tags from pages that you have created yourself. If you do not believe the page should be deleted, then please place {{hangon}} on the page (please do not remove any existing speedy deletion tag) and make your case on the page's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. SmashvilleBONK! 05:05, 4 January 2008 (UTC)

Please stop removing speedy deletion notices from pages that you have created yourself. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. SmashvilleBONK! 05:33, 4 January 2008 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you remove a speedy deletion notice from a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. SmashvilleBONK! 05:45, 4 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Fixed

I restored the page. - Rjd0060 (talk) 05:10, 8 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Duplicate images uploaded

Thanks for uploading Image:RDNS Logo.jpg. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you also uploaded the same image under the name Image:RDNS Logo.JPG. The copy called Image:RDNS Logo.JPG has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.

This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone, and you do not need to respond. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and refer to 'my contributions' to remind yourself exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot (talk) 01:29, 11 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] RDNS cleanup

Hi Kate, did some cleanup on the article for you and I hope you agree it looks much better now. I have a request though, I would welcome it if you can provide some news references or articles from magazines that cover the organization and add them to the article (or the talkpage if you don't know what to do with them exactly). Some other things that I suggest:

  • move the history (which is the most interesting in my eyes) up in the article. My advice is "Introduction and description of current organization, history, provided services, organizational structure and other facts. Some of what is in the "Fast facts" (bad sectiontitle btw), might best be integrated into the lead of the section, possible the "vision" as well.
  • When adding "wikilinks" in general, link them only once and especially the more "simple" terms like "organization" and "nurse". More complicated things like deceases etc, can be linked multiple times as long as they are in different sections of the article.
  • Try to rework the Organisational Structure section into something that is not a list. It is almost alway better to write prose
  • Do not opinion-ate. The introduction for instance contained the word "compassionate". That is not a word that fits into an encyclopedia article. It is too personal of a description of something. If it is part of a quote out of an article for instance, then it might be usable further down in the article. Especially if the organisation was especially noted in the press as being "compassionate" for instance. But otherwise please try not to use such words. It makes the article read too much like an advertisement.
  • Read WP:COI. You seem to be involved with the organization, so I just wanna make sure you understand the potential issues that can lead to in an article. It is not forbidden, but it is harder to write properly about something if you are too much personally involved with a subject at times.

I hope you continue to write on the subject. It has a nice history in my opinion. --TheDJ (talk • contribs) 12:42, 11 January 2008 (UTC)


My image on the Royal District Nursing Service page won't load and it is massive! How do I fix it?? ThanksKat7202 (talk) 04:50, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Images won't load

My image won't load on my Royal District Nursing Service page and it look massive on the screen. Please help?Kat7202 (talk) 04:54, 12 May 2008 (UTC) How do I reduce the picture size on Royal District Nursing Service page? I just want the image to sit along the right hand side of the text. Please helpKat7202 (talk) 03:01, 14 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Orphaned non-free media (Image:Nursesonbikes.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Nursesonbikes.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:13, 14 May 2008 (UTC)