User talk:Kaszeta
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Hi Kaszeta: You are right. I hate to make enemies here. The only information I want pasted into the America West page is the one about the sponsorships with professional teams, because I understand that is an important part of the airline's history and should be kept.
Also, the spelling of the city of Nagoya, its Nagoya. Im not saying this to make you feel wrong about it, but because we want people to see Wikipedia as a serious, informative page when they come here for the first time.
I see you made this page August 13, 2004! That's my birthday!!
I have an America West Boeing 747 model that was given to me by airline management back in 1990. I live here in Phoenix, and I love AW. The only thing is that I think Sky Harbor should have more international airlines, at least for our planespotter's enjoyment, dont you agree?
Matter of factly you are more than welcome to read my user page and see my list of model airplanes.
Thanks for being respectful, and remember, never take the wars here seriously, just enjoy the experience at wikipedia, as you are doing so far!
God bless you!
Sincerely yours, "Antonio Puerto Rican in the desert Martin"
Hi Kaszeta! Where are you from?
I didnt work at AW, although I wish I did! When I got the AW plane model I had just arrived from Puerto Rico. I was 15 and already a frustrated pilot because of my Diabetes. My family communicated with AW and management made sure I had my plastic 747 model along with a t shirt and a few other small goodies. It was one of the happiest days of my life.
That pretty much started my desktop collecting hobby.
Im thinking of buying a Southwest Airlines model in the future, maybe a Northwest later. I prefer to collect by airline rather than by model.
Im concentrating on models of airlines gone by now. Im going to buy myself a Western Airlines model as a late birthday present tomorrow.
As far as America West, the page looks excellent now. I began the page with some basic information (including the professional teams); it was a stub then, but gradually more people put more info.
Thanks for everything and God bless you!
Sincerely yours, "Antonio Higher than the clouds Martin"
PS: How was Nagoya?
[edit] All Right
I will try to attempt some sort of compromise I'm going to read the policies.--198 00:20, 2 Oct 2004 (UTC)
- Many thanks. That image is not without controversy, but we do have a policy to try to come to group concensus. Welcome to Wikipedia, and I hope you can contribute. Kaszeta 00:23, 2 Oct 2004 (UTC)
[edit] thanks for catching the Seinfeld vandalism
good jobPedant 18:47, 2004 Oct 22 (UTC)
[edit] List of wilderness areas
Thanks for the catch. Appears to be a bug. I clicked on edit after viewing the diff for the latest two changes. And it appears to have made me edit the older version, not the newer. Rmhermen 12:46, Oct 23, 2004 (UTC)
[edit] Vandalism of Ottawa by User:216.208.8.227
I blocked the guy you listed at VIP for 2 months. Hopefully it will be done quicker next time. Thue | talk 11:53, 24 Oct 2004 (UTC)
[edit] Article Licensing
Hi, I've started a drive to get users to multi-license all of their contributions that they've made to either (1) all U.S. state, county, and city articles or (2) all articles, using the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike (CC-by-sa) v1.0 and v2.0 Licenses or into the public domain if they prefer. The CC-by-sa license is a true free documentation license that is similar to Wikipedia's license, the GFDL, but it allows other projects, such as WikiTravel, to use our articles. Since you are among the top 2000 Wikipedians by edits, I was wondering if you would be willing to multi-license all of your contributions or at minimum those on the geographic articles. Over 90% of people asked have agreed. For More Information:
- Multi-Licensing FAQ - Lots of questions answered
- Multi-Licensing Guide
- Free the Rambot Articles Project
To allow us to track those users who muli-license their contributions, many users copy and paste the "{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}" template into their user page, but there are other options at Template messages/User namespace. The following examples could also copied and pasted into your user page:
- Option 1
- I agree to [[Wikipedia:Multi-licensing|multi-license]] all my contributions, with the exception of my user pages, as described below:
- {{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}
OR
- Option 2
- I agree to [[Wikipedia:Multi-licensing|multi-license]] all my contributions to any [[U.S. state]], county, or city article as described below:
- {{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}
Or if you wanted to place your work into the public domain, you could replace "{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}" with "{{MultiLicensePD}}". If you only prefer using the GFDL, I would like to know that too. Please let me know what you think at my talk page. It's important to know either way so no one keeps asking. -- Ram-Man (comment| talk)
[edit] Bodaciously excellent images for Blue Plate Special!
Thanks!
I have photoshopped them just a bit to make out the wording on the sign a little more readable, and to make the plate divisions more visible... hope you don't mind. Dpbsmith (talk) 21:56, 29 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- I don't mind at all, and the results look better than the 10 seconds I spent photoshopping it. Thanks. Next time I'll actually order the Blue plate special so we can have a picture of the plate with actual food on it(I was craving a burger this time, not the "Ultimate Panfries"). -- Kaszeta 03:23, 30 Dec 2004 (UTC)
[edit] Thanks...
...for catching my goof-up on Escape Velocity (computer game). --foobaz·✎ 17:55, 6 Jan 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Perforate
Which dictionary are you using? According to dictionary.com, the only adjective is perforate. This is why the antonym of this adjective is imperforate and never imperforated. I'm not talking about American vs British usage. --brian0918™ 17:05, 30 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- Umm, according to Dictionary.com[1], "perforated" is perfectly acceptable. -- Kaszeta 17:12, 30 Jan 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Salton Sea Photos
Hey, you're welcome man. I have quite a few more but I didn't want to add to many (page might take to long to load...)
Best,
Jeff --AnimAlu 19:23, 22 Mar 2005 (UTC)
[edit] How to investigate IP addresses?
How do I find out what company owns an IP address? I would like to investigate possible sock puppetry. Thanks, Rad Racer | Talk 02:58, 10 Apr 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Thanks for Helping with Town Gas
Klonimus 05:50, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Wiktionary
Hey, thanks for marking dicdefs for transwiki. For future reference, please use the template {{Move to Wiktionary}} rather than linking to the category. Otherwise the program won't pick it up. I've gone through and changed all of yours from before. --Dmcdevit 02:29, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- Thanks for the heads-up. For some reason I didn't find the template before. -- Kaszeta 12:16, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Ultimate frisbee links...
I think we do need a "league" or "local" link list, or page. I mentioned this on Talk but didn't get any response. I don't think it's appropriate for the main article. Wikibofh 23:21, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC)
[edit] The filling in the sandwich
ndash->mdash (the latter is punctuation, the former is not).
Hmm. It would be interesting to know what, then, you call the en-dash if it is not a punctuation mark. I am perfectly aware that the use of unspaced em-dashes is US (and was 19th-century British) punctuation style. That fact does not, however, invalidate the present-day practice – elsewhere in the world – of delimiting parentheses with space en-dash space. -- Picapica 21:59, 3 May 2005 (UTC)\
- Actually, you do have a point. If an article has nothing but space-endash-space as punctuation (or space-emdash-space even), I tend to leave well enough alone. But if it has space-hyphen-space or hyphen-hyphen, I correct it, as there is clearly a better alternative. And usually I change hyphen in ranges if I come across them accordingly as well. And if an article has a smattering of different styles (which was what sandwich had), I change them all to a single style (usually emdashes without spaces). -- Kaszeta 23:53, 3 May 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Image:UdvarHazyCenter.jpg
Dear Kaszeta, you uploaded the UdvarHazyCenter-picture. I'm actually looking for a picture of the Boeing 307. I know that one 307 is preserved in the Udvar Hazy Center. Did you took a picture of the 307 by chance during your visit at the center? Best regards from germany -- Stahlkocher 09:54, 16 May 2005 (UTC)
- Dear Kaszeta, thank you so much for this picture. I uploaded the picture into the commons, so i can use it in ther german wikipedia too. Best regards, -- Stahlkocher 17:28, 16 May 2005 (UTC)
[edit] FEBO picture
a picture of a FEBO can be found at [2].
CobaltBlueTony 14:21, Jun 1, 2005 (UTC)
- Thanks. I've emailed a couple of people to see if they have an image they're willing to release under the GFDL. (Alas, despite 100s of images of my own from Amsterdam, I apparently never took a photo of a FEBO) -- Kaszeta 14:23, 1 Jun 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Requested move
A proposal has been made on Wikipedia:Requested moves to rename Wikipedia:Naming conventions (movies) and move it to Wikipedia:Naming conventions (films). Please see the discussion and vote on Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (movies). --Viriditas | Talk 10:29, 26 Jun 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Don Saklad
Sorry. Never heard of him, my gut feeling is that he is not notable and, in particular, not as notable as Jessamyn West, but out of a) courtesy to you and b) a reluctance to bother researching the issue, I'm just going to stay out of this one. But thanks for the heads-up anyway. Dpbsmith (talk) 14:32, 15 July 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Forced Busing
Hi Rich/Kaszeta, I saw that you edited the forced busing article after I overhauled it. I was wondering if I could get your opinion on how the article looks now and thoughts on improving it further. "Criticism" is a bad first section, at least in name, maybe the first section should talk about the court rulings? Also, did "forced busing" go by any other names? In Cleveland it was just called "busing". Thank you for your thoughts. DirectorStratton 22:46, July 25, 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Thanks
Hey there Kas: Como Tale Vous?? I hope great! Thanks for the link to the discussion about ComCat. I put my opinion already.
Once again, thanks and God bless you!
Sincerely yours, Antonio Air France pilot (I wish!!) Martin
[edit] Thanks
Thank you for the link on acid rebound on the GERD page, very helpful. Minerva9 16:17, 4 August 2005 (UTC)Minerva9
[edit] VFDs
I have dealt with the article Hermann Bauer for you. If there is anything else, don't hesitate to bring it to my attention. Thanks! Linuxbeak | Talk | Desk 21:41, August 5, 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Welcome To Our Wikiproject!
Please let me know if there's anything I can do to help out, or anything you'd like to do to help out the project as a whole! karmafist 01:02, 14 December 2005 (UTC)
- No fair! I wanted to welcome Kaszeta! Jokermage "Timor Mentum Occidit" 02:15, 14 December 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Taylor number
Kaszeta,
I edited your entry for Taylor number b/c the definition you use seems not to be very general. I am guessing it is for Couette flow between two concentric rotating spheres? Anyway, Drazin & Reid as well as Chandrasekhar discuss various definitions, but the most general seems to be the formula that I put in there. Contact me if you have any comments/concerns. Thanks, Petwil 23:44, 17 December 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Flying Buffalo
Please see the policy Wikipedia:No original research specifically against this. Thank you for your note. --Perfecto 14:45, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
- I read this policy different (I'm not doing original research, I'm quoting the history a company is publishing on their own web site). But that's not an issue to argue here, and I may indeed be wrong. I'll start a topic on this over on WP:RS. -- Kaszeta 16:06, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Beer Categories
It has been suggested by User:BrianSmithson that the Beer and brewery categories should be renamed. The proposal has been supported by User:Syrthiss, and supported and expanded by myself. The notion is that the regional categories should follow the format of "Beer and breweries in Africa" /Europe/Asia/North America/South America/Oceania. "Brewers and breweries" could also be renamed "Beer and breweries by region". And all the countries should also be renamed (and merged if needed) as, for example, "Beer and breweries of Germany", "Beer and breweries of Britain", "Beer and breweries of Poland". The word in each case would be beer rather than beers to allow for general articles on beer culture in each region as well as individual beers.
Comments, suggestions, objections and simple votes to Wiki Beer Project SilkTork 14:54, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Get involved in social nudity naming convention debates!
Hi, I'd like to invite you to get involved in establishing consensus in discussions concerning naming conventions for social nudity topics.
Please join in this community discussion regarding the name of Portal:Clothes free.
Participate here: Portal_talk:Clothes_free#Votes
Please also join in the discussion about what to name an article dealing with social nudity. I believe the the latter term is a better term to use than naturism or nudism as it is more WP:NPOV and is in use currently. Formerly the article was titled Clothes free movement.
Participate here: Talk:Naturism#Move_to_Social_nudity
Cheers,
User:Dandelion (talk|contribs) 20:15, 15 April 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Zonta
I can't imagine what possessed me to delete this, if the text was as it is now (I don't remember the article) - must have been a temporary abberation, my aplogies jimfbleak 15:15, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Brewery poll
Your vote/opinion on brewery notability is requested here: [3] SilkTork 12:01, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot 23:10, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Fluid Dynamics Project
I have created {{Fluid}} and the relevant categories. Can you come up with an image to use and can we start tagging articles. I think this will (hopefully) mean that if people move into this section (or away from it) it will be easier to keep track of what has been done and what needs to be done. Is this a good idea, have you any feedback? Rex the first talk | contribs 23:15, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
- I'll see if I can get a nice picture of a vortex street or something similar. -- Kaszeta 23:38, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Segway Geeks
Geeklera Segway Geek 21:22, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] A request for assistance
Would you support the concept of moving the Earhart "myths" to a separate page or article? The reason for my suggesting this is that the main article should be an accurate and scholarly work while the speculation and conspiracy theories surrounding the disappearance of Amelia Earhart are interesting, they belong in a unique section. Most researchers, as you know, discount the many theories and speculation that has arisen in the years following her last flight. Go onto the Earhart discussion page and register your vote/comments...and a Happy New Year to you as well. Bzuk 02:50 3 January 2007 (UTC).
[edit] Non-free use disputed for Image:Orkut.Logo.png
This file may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading Image:Orkut.Logo.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted after seven days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 01:48, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
[edit] AfD nomination of Escape Velocity Override
Escape Velocity Override, an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that Escape Velocity Override satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Escape Velocity Override and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Escape Velocity Override during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. AvruchTalk 22:41, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Speedy deletion of Escape Velocity Override
A tag has been placed on Escape Velocity Override, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}}
to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. AvruchTalk 00:38, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
[edit] AfD nomination of White van speakers
An editor has nominated White van speakers, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").
Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/White van speakers and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).
You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 11:29, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:James Page Logo.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:James Page Logo.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 23:46, 13 February 2008 (UTC)