User talk:Kartik.nanjund

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, Kartik.nanjund, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Wikipedia Boot Camp, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user talk page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!  Dr Debug (Talk) 15:24, 4 February 2006 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] Some Indian Links

Hi Kartik, these are some links for Indians on Wikipedia that you may be interested in:

Links for Wikipedians interested in India content

Register: Indian Wikipedians | Network: Noticeboard | Discussionboard Browse: India | Open tasks | Deletions
Contribute content: Collaboration Dashboard - India WikiProject - Wikiportal India - Indian current events - Category adoptions



I also noticed that you are hindu. We have a Hinduism project at Wikipedia to improve Hinduism related information together. Thanks, if you need any help just talk to me. GizzaChat © 07:55, 7 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Your edits on Narendra Modi

You made this edit on the concerned article. However, this is a very unsubstantiated addition. Please cite relevant sources when you make such changes. You can also discussion the changes on the talk page of the article. Please edit constructively on Wikipedia. Regards, --Andy123(talk) 17:20, 14 April 2006 (UTC)

Please do not remove edits from your talk page. It makes tasks difficult for other users. Regarding this edit of yours on the same page and the source you included in the text, looks like a source to a blogsite which has not even referenced the information properly. Please review Wikipedia's policy on reliable sources, and using primary sources for the article. Regards, --Andy123(talk) 13:54, 15 April 2006 (UTC)
The source I cited was not a absolute one. It references a lot of links from other newspapers "reliable sources" and summarises them. Kartik.nanjund 07:21, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
Your entry on the article has been reverted, because the source you have used is not offcial in anyway. It looks more like a blog. Please refer to my above comments. If you have a true source from a newspaper, you are welcome to cite it. If there was a case of death of 100+ policement, then there would definately be a mention on the internet about it. And coming to reasonability, can you even believe the fact that 100+ armed policemen were killed by a mob? ;) Please refer to the talk page of Narendra Modi. Regards, and have fun editing Wikipedia! --Andy123(talk) 16:21, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
I have posted a note on the talk page of Narendra Modi, please discuss your rationale there. I have cited proper sources and authority for the statement. Kindly do the same, if you wish. Regards, --Andy123(talk) 14:56, 20 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Be cool

Please assume good faith when dealing with other editors. See Wikipedia:Assume good faith for the guidelines on this. Happy editing!

- Aksi_great (talk) 15:02, 20 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Removing names

Hi, please read the article. It says that Hinduism does not consider converts as apostates as such but only as bhrasta (corrupted) and there is always scope for "returning" to Hinduism for them. So "Hindu apostates" would be an oxymoron.Babub 16:22, 2 May 2006 (UTC)

That is a POV. People who have becore Brashta's consider that they have quit hinduism. So I think their names still require mention Kartik.nanjund 10:32, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
Ok, do add the "bhrastas" list if you like but don't forget to mention the Hindu PoV.Babub 11:58, 4 May 2006 (UTC)