User talk:KaragouniS

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is KaragouniS's talk page, where you can send messages and comments to KaragouniS.
Archives: 1, 2
This is a Wikipedia user talk page.

This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user to whom this talk page belongs to may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia itself. The original talk page is located at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:KaragouniS.
Warning Please note: Comments left by anonymous editors may be removed without warning. Please create an account or log in if you wish to engage in a meaningful discussion.
  1. September 2005 – 26 November 2006
  2. November 2006 – July 2007
  3. 21 July 2007 - 18 Januray 2008

Contents

[edit] Rick 20as

Hello, I am trying to help this user understand image uploads and why he shouldn't swap out various images with his own, but we really shouldn't be accusing him of "vandalism". I think the better approach is to educate him. Agreed? --Spike Wilbury ♫ talk 19:56, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

I have blocked him indefinitely until he agrees to communicate and follow the rules. Thanks for being patient! --Spike Wilbury ♫ talk 00:31, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Balkan Cup

Hello, you reverted my change on the page about the Balkan Cup concerning the country Velež Mostar is from saying that back in those days it was part of Yugoslavia. Thing is - Serbia, Croatia, Montenegro, Macedonia, Bosnia & Herzegovina were all parts of Yugoslavia back then and in fact I see no point in sorting teams by their present-day countries. However, if that's the proper thing to do, I'm fine with it but Velež can't possibly be Serbian since Mostar (the city they are from) is actually quite comfortably situated in Bosnia. So the list of clubs should either list Dinamo Zagreb, Radnički Niš, Velež Mostar etc as all being Yugoslavian - or as hailing from present-day Croatia, Serbia and Bosnia Herzegovina. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Timbouctou (talk • contribs) 19:53, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Request For Rollback

I have granted your request for rollback. Please remember only to use it for vandalism. Pedro :  Chat  21:22, 27 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Blocked

For your long term revert war and ownership attitude on Panathinaikos FC, I've blocked you for 31h. I am also putting you on notice that you are from now on placed on a revert parole of one revert per day maximum on all articles relating to Greek football. This is exempting only reverts of obvious, blatant vandalism (but before you invoke this exception, please read up very carefully on what vandalism is and what it is not. Furthermore, you are required to accompany every revert with a full expanation of your reasons.

I have also removed your rollback privilege, since you have been constantly misusing it for revert warring in content disputes. Fut.Perf. ☼ 14:00, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

Hello, about your comments. First off, please don't post under anon IPs on other people's pages while you're blocked. You can use this page for whatever communication you need during this time. About the issue, I appreciate your efforts in vandal fighting, but I do have the impression you have been mixing in your own definition of "vandalism" with your own content ideas about what the Panathinaikos article should look like. Of the recent rollback reverts, at least the following are about apparently good-faith content edits: [1], [2], [3], [4] (with some others I find it harder to tell since I don't know the topic). Remember, "vandalism" is only when you are absolutely certain that the other guy is consciously, deliberately degrading the article. As long as there is a chance that the other guy subjectively believes he is making the article better, be that ever so erroneous, you must not treat it as vandalism.
About the specific case of those two players, what struck me is (1) that you upheld this edit war over several months, apparently against objections by numerous other contributors who all felt they should be included; (2) that your arguments against including them look very emotional and POV-driven. As an admin evaluating the situation I'm not really supposed to judge whether you are right or not, but in this case I can't help but feeling that your argument lacks merit. These two guys are clearly notable footballers (Hell, even I know Nikopolidis, and that's saying something!), and they are uncontroversially former players. The section is about notable former players. They are notable and they are former players, period. Their popularity or their loyalty to the club is immaterial. Fut.Perf. ☼ 20:33, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
I guess you are right, and thanks for clarifying me some things. It seems that I wasn't ready enough to use rollback tool but I hope I'll be in the future - but please also explain it to the other admin who gave me this right, Thanks again and sorry for my behaviour.. :) --KaragouniS :  Chat  21:26, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

Φίλε συγγνώμη απλά δε ήξερα που αλλού να πάω.Δεν ήθελα να κάνουμε ο ένας revert στον άλλον συνέχεια.Δεν ήθελα να χάσεις το rollback απλά σου ξαναλέω ο Νικοπολιδης και ο Κωνσταντινου έχουν θέση δίπλα στον Δομάζο και τον Δελικαρη(δεν σε πειράζει που ειναι αυτος σημαία του ΟΣΦΠ;)Αυτοί τον έχουν και δικαίως στην δικια τους σελίδα.Απο κει και πέρα ας πουμε εγω δεν θα έβαζα τον Καρούλια ή τον Φιλακούρη ως noted οπως δεν θα έβαζα τον Αναστασιάδη στους noted παικτες του παρελθοντος στον ΠΑΟΚ ή τον Ανατολάκη στον ΟΣΦΠ αλλά τελωσπάντων υπάρχουν.Δεν είναι αδικία και εγκυκλοπαιδικό λάθος να αρνήστε να μπει ο Νικοπολίδης ο οποιος μετα τον Σαργκάνη και τον Οικονομόπουλο είναι ο μεγαλύτερος Έλληνας τερματοφύλακας ολων των εποχών και ο Κωνσταντίνου που ήταν το κανόνι του Ελληνικού πρωταθλήματος για 8 χρονια;Και δεν είναι μονο τα γκολ του (θυμασαι τα 9 που ειχε βάλει στην πορεια το 2001-2 νομίζω στο CL;) αλλά και ο ρολος του ως τανκ στην επιθεση.

Κατα τ'άλλα και πάλι σορρυ φαινεσαι ξηγημένο παιδι και θα μπορούσαμε να την λύσουμε την παρεξήγηση μονοι μας αλλά δεν το ξερα τοτε.Mea culpa. Eagle of Pontus

[edit] Derby

Ευχαριστώ! Βέβαια δεν ξέρω αν θα πρέπει να βάλουμε και αυτά τα παιχνίδια γιατί θα γίνει πολύ μεγάλο το κομμάτι με τους πίνακες. Άλλωστε αυτά τα παιχνίδια δεν τα μετράνε και πολύ στην προϊστορία των δύο ομάδων αν και από μία άποψη θα ήταν καλό να μπουν. Είμαι μπερδεμένος. Επειδή έχω φτιάξει και το αντίστοιχο άρθρο στο μπάσκετ, αν μπορούσες να βρεις παιχνίδια πριν το 1986-87 θα ήταν καλό. - Sthenel (talk) 11:47, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:GPCBuenosAires@85-45-6-6.png

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:GPCBuenosAires@85-45-6-6.png. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Polly (Parrot) 18:18, 13 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Orphaned non-free media (Image:BlackfieldI.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:BlackfieldI.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. NotifyBot (talk) 13:07, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] 1994 San Marino Grand Prix

Hi. I noticed you removed this bit about the HANS device from the article. It's inclusion does seem a bit tenuous with it being introduced in 2001, but the FIA first started investigating and adapting it in 1996, two years after the event. Source:[5]. Do you think if it was made clearer in the body of the article that investigations started in '96, it would be suitable to include in the article? AlexJ (talk) 08:47, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Orphaned non-free media (Image:Scuderia Ferrari Logo.png)

Thanks for uploading Image:Scuderia Ferrari Logo.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:02, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Panathinaikos FC 2007-2008

Hi there, could you please help me a bit with the article Panathinaikos F.C. season 2007-08. I mean i find it hard to gather all the info for the article since i have to search in many websites. I'd appreciate it if you could give me a hand.Sergiogr (talk) 07:29, 27 May 2008 (UTC)