Talk:Kapil Dev as Indian national cricket coach
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Merger suggestion
I think this is a good article, but it should be a section within the Kapil Dev biographical piece rather than a separate piece. Any encyclopedia user looking for this information is very unlikely to search under this title: they would look under Kapil Dev, or under Indian national cricket team. Johnlp 22:19, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
- No they wouldn't but, there is a summary of the coaching, and a link to this page, per Wikipedia:Summary style. Blnguyen (bananabucket) 01:33, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
- I created the page because the size of the Kapil Dev Wiki page was getting large. As Blnguyen points out, there is a summary of his coaching credentials in the main page along with a link to this page. Kalyan 14:16, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
- Oh, all right. I see why you did it, but I just think it's a bit odd to have a slice of someone's life story in a separate article. But then I don't have a problem with long articles if they're good articles full of interesting information, which the Kapil Dev one is. Johnlp 11:09, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
[edit] GA comment
Before another editor reviews this, make sure that all inline citations are moved to after the punctuation with no spaces in between. --Nehrams2020 00:45, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] GA Passed
I'm very pleased with this article's coverage of Kapil Dev's time as coach, plentiful citations, and quality of prose. After adding some wikilinks to help our non-cricket obsessed readers, I have only three issues. Two involve the lead:
- it is much too long with unneeded details for a summary and some sort of context should be provided about who Kapil Dev was before and, hence, why anyone would want to make him coach.
- added context of his achievements prior to coaching stint. --Kalyan 06:59, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
- Also, there are no citations in the lead. I know the facts stated appear later cited in the article, but I think they should be cited in the lead as well. I'm a bit confused on this point since I've seen GA articles with uncited leads and without...let's cite them unless someone has some consensus to tell me about.
- I think citations is not necessary for lead section articles if statements made here can be validated in the main article. If there is any such statement, you need validation - buzz me and i shall add the same. --Kalyan 06:59, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
- Finally, the table in the Legacy section needs a citation. That's all...
- Done. Added. --Kalyan 06:59, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
- maybe add a few more wikilinks to cricket terms.
- need help from you in finding terms that you require wikilinks for. i had a go at the article on the same. --Kalyan 06:59, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
--Meowist 23:56, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
Yo yo...this aritcle's been on hold for 5 days. Only two more days left and I have to fail it, I think. --Meowist 19:06, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
- Made it in the nick of time, i suppose. please let me know if all is well with the addressal of the comments. --Kalyan 06:59, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
Cool. I'm pleased with the changes made to the article and am passing it --Meowist 17:22, 19 July 2007 (UTC)