Talk:Kamado

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Kamado article.

Article policies
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the quality scale.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
This article is part of WikiProject China, a project to improve all China-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other China-related articles, please join the project. All interested editors are welcome.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the quality scale.
This article is maintained by the Chinese history workgroup.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Japan, a project to improve all Japan-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other Japan-related articles, please join the project. All interested editors are welcome.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the assessment scale.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

The link to the Naked Whiz ceramic charcoal cooker website is not spam. It is the most thorough and wide-ranging site on the web devoted to cooking on ceramic charcoal cookers. Please do not remove this link! 69.134.190.156 (talk) 20:53, 13 April 2008 (UTC)

Sorry, it's WP:SPAM. Don't add it again. Jauerbackdude?/dude. 22:50, 13 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Recent link deletions

I'm having trouble understanding this recent activity related to deleting the link to the Naked Whiz web site. This site has been labeled spam by an editor. This site is recognized as the best source of information on the web about ceramic kamado-style charcoal cookers. If anyone reading this article wanted more information about these types of cookers, that would be the logical place for them to go. I use it constantly. However, it is labeled Spam. I am then confounded why this editor then saw fit to leave the link to the http://www.barbecue-smoker-recipes.com/kamado-barbecue-grills.html. This website contains little information, much of it of dubious value, and the site is primarily a Google Ads revenue generator. If the Naked Whiz's site is Spam, this barbecue smoker recipes site is spam squared. Also, the barbecue smoker recipes website is owned by the gentleman who initially created this article, which as I read the rules, is forbidden. So why was it left by the editor? 129.33.49.251 (talk) 20:05, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

First of all thanks for pointing that out. I've removed that, too. Secondly, please specify which article you're speaking about, because the link above wasn't in this article. It was in The Big Green Egg article. However, I did catch the second instance of the spam link in this article to the Naked Whiz, too. Thanks again. Jauerbackdude?/dude. 20:46, 14 April 2008 (UTC)