Talk:Kalimba
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The language of this article seems too poetic for an encyclopaedia text. Reflections about intuition and notes mapping are unnecessary (although what the author says is true). What do you think? Ivan.Lt (talk) 04:15, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Comments
I just want to commend the contributors who made this page as nice as it is, and to offer one minor but important suggestion: whenever you put a 5-line staff in for an example, the note heads don't mean anything in terms of pitch until you also include a clef. In this case, it's almost obvious that what's intended was a treble (G) clef, but it's much better form to explicitly include the clef than to omit it. This is coming from a professional musician who's been reading music since childhood. Some rules are unbreakable in written (western) notation. FYI I am equally critical of rhythmic notation, which tends to be even looser in construction. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Fjeinca (talk • contribs) 01:54, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
I too think that Thumb piano should be part of the kalimba artical A.K.A. thumb piano or something —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.42.157.90 (talk) 00:38, 23 April 2008 (UTC)