Talk:Kaleidoscope Entertainment

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	Film Portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Films. This project is a central gathering of editors working to build comprehensive and detailed articles for film topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
Stub This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the quality scale. ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the priority scale.
Editing Guidelines Please remember these guidelines when editing a film article: If a non-film article already exists with the name of the film that you are trying to create an article for, disambiguate and use (film) in the title: Film Title (film) For more information see: Wikipedia:Naming conventions (films) When writing an article about a particular film, the general format should be a concise lead section, followed by a plot summary of no more than 900 words, production details, a cast list, a reception section, and references. Create an Infobox that tells all pertinent information about the film. Article upgrading needed: You can help! WP:IA   Stub to Start-Class Upgrading Instructions for Films Note that instructions for articles on other types of film topics within the scope of WikiProject Films are currently under development. To contribute in upgrading this stub article to Start class, the following requirements must be met: Significant intro (list the title, alternate titles, year released, director, actors starring in the film, summary of headings, etc.) Film infobox ({{infobox film}}) Picture: Consult WikiProject Free Images for freely released images from a film shoot, opening, or other relevant free image. Non-free and unlicensed images are to be avoided if at all possible, but if used should include a detailed fair use rationale. (An image is not required for start class if unavailable.) Plot summary Include cast and crew information. At least two other developed sections of information (production, reception (including box office figures), awards and honors, themes, differences from novel or TV show, soundtrack, sequels, DVD release, etc.) Categories (by year, country, language, and genre(s))  Helpful links: WP:BETTER, WP:LEAD, WP:REF, WP:WAF Once this article has fulfilled these requirements, the film can be reassessed to Start class and this template will be removed automatically.
Additional Information: This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-Class status: Referencing and citation: not checked Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: not checked Grammar: not checked Supporting materials: not checked To fill out this checklist, please add the following to the template call: <!-- 1. It is suitably referenced, and all major points are appropriately cited. --> |B-Class-1=yes/no <!-- 2. It reasonably covers the topic, and does not contain major omissions or inaccuracies. --> |B-Class-2=yes/no <!-- 3. It has a defined structure, including a lead section and one or more sections of content. --> |B-Class-3=yes/no <!-- 4. It is free from major grammatical errors. --> |B-Class-4=yes/no <!-- 5. It contains appropriate supporting materials, such as an infobox, images, or diagrams. --> |B-Class-5=yes/no Related task forces (general): Filmmaking task force Related task forces (nations and regions): Indian cinema task force

from VfD:

This was tagged for speedy deletion by User:Tregoweth, citing the reason "it is advertising". I'm not sure it needs to be deleted, so I'm listing it here. – Quadell ^{(talk) (help)}[[]] 14:57, Dec 7, 2004 (UTC)

• Delete. Definite advertising, looks like an amateurish homepage for the production company! rturus 15:16, 7 Dec 2004 (UTC)
  • weak keep .. Since I am new here I suppose the edited NPOV text is probably acceptable. If I knew how to strike out my earlier delete I would! rturus 22:37, 7 Dec 2004 (UTC)

    I've taken the liberty of doing it for you, and moving your new vote (there's no "fixed procedure", or anything, just do whatever is clear). Look at the source to see how it's done. I'm using the ironic tag. :-) JRM 22:48, 2004 Dec 7 (UTC)

• Keep. Company seems notable, judging from the list of films. It should be rewritten though, to remove the marketing bumpf. --LeeHunter 16:04, 7 Dec 2004 (UTC)
• Definite keep but clean up and tone down the POVvyness. [[User:GRider|GRider\^talk]] 17:21, 7 Dec 2004 (UTC)
• Keep Was definitely horrid and amateurish with all the PoV propaganda, which I have removed. They're a notable enough Bollywood (Indian film-making)company. Wyss 19:46, 7 Dec 2004 (UTC)
• Delete: Advertising. Geogre 19:52, 7 Dec 2004 (UTC)
• Keep the current version. User:Wyss has basically rewritten it, and it's now NPOV. – Quadell ^{(talk) (help)}[[]] 21:14, Dec 7, 2004 (UTC)
• Keep it. —[[User:Radman1|RaD Man (talk)]] 23:54, 7 Dec 2004 (UTC)
• Keep: DCEdwards1966 00:09, Dec 8, 2004 (UTC)
• Keep. I've seen one of their movies, so they are clearly notable. [[User:GeorgeStepanek|GeorgeStepanek\^talk ]] 01:11, 8 Dec 2004 (UTC)

end moved discussion