Talk:Kala Lagaw Ya

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Kala Lagaw Ya article.

Article policies
This article is within the scope of the following WikiProjects:

Um... if it's a language isolate, surely it can't be part of the Pama-Nyungan language family? thefamouseccles 00:43, 10 Nov 2005 (UTC)

The term isolate can be used to describe a language that is thought to be part of a family, but can't be definitely linked to any specific branch of the family—or forms a branch of its own, where it is the only (surviving) member. --Ptcamn 15:56, 14 December 2005 (UTC)
But we can no doubt agree this terminology is somewhat confusing? Caesarion 15:58, 14 December 2005 (UTC)
i'd have to say its not confusing in the context. It clearly says "an isolate within the family". That explains what it means pretty clearly. --Krsont 22:09, 2 April 2006 (UTC)

The reason for stating that it is an isolate in that it is pretty distant from its Australia sister languages (roughly 6% cognation with its closest neighbours). Also the fact that it has a pretty high non-Australian content gives this status. --Roidhrigh 19.27, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Rename

Pick one of the four names, disambig from the others. The name is so long as to be useless. Chris 05:00, 3 August 2007 (UTC)

It states that Kalaw Lagaw Ya is correct, do maybe that as it is in the text. Enlil Ninlil 06:13, 3 August 2007 (UTC)