User talk:Kaisershatner

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Contents

[edit] Wikipedia:Featured article review/United States Bill of Rights

I noticed the article on the Bill of Rights has an {{unreferencedsection}} template in it; possibly, the paragraph immediately following this template may need additional inline citations.

It may turn out that such citations are not necessary; on the other hand, detailed citations assist in guarding against copyright violations, so I think that discussion should be part of a formal featured article review, for which I have nominated the article.

Please post your views on this matter to Wikipedia:Featured article review/United States Bill of Rights. 69.140.152.55 (talk) 22:44, 21 March 2008 (UTC)

Don't worry, I need a wikibreak too. Hopefully the WP:FAR process doesn't move too quickly. 69.140.152.55 (talk) 04:52, 22 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Re: Rc Patrol

I use twinkle to revert the edits and issue the warnings and it kinda does it automatically but you can take a look at Wikipedia:Template_messages/User_talk_namespace#Single-level_templates which may help i am almost positive you will find the template with what you need.


Thanks Staffwaterboy Talk♂ 16:47, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Re Re: Rc Patrol

The template you are looking for is

{{subst:uw-vandalism4im}}

Thanks Staffwaterboy Talk♂ 16:51, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Philippe de Montebello

Thanks for your help with this article, it's been on my to-do list for some time as it was in such a state. TRAVELLINGCARIMy storyTell me yours 18:36, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

Per this which cited the oath of allegiance, they do need to renounce. When I first quickly read your comment I read it as 'notability' instead of 'nobility' and was thinking 's/he is working on the Met and it's curators and is questioning notability??' and then I learnt to read properly :) If you're interested in museums in general, I'll poke you lightly toward WP:MUSEUMS ;) TRAVELLINGCARIMy storyTell me yours 18:44, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Steiner Redlich

hello. i trying to understand you actions with regard to Steiner Redlich (talk · contribs). you blanked his talk page [1] then removed him from the administrators notice board without addressing the block request [2]. please advise. --emerson7 19:57, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

oic...i didn't scroll down far enough. anyway, he's been blocked for 48 hours. hopefully that will keep him at bay for a while. cheers! --emerson7 21:36, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Bill Ayers

Ok, I see now. thanks, It is me i think (talk) 15:14, 21 April 2008 (UTC)

I posted on the Discussion page for the article. No, I don't think it's animus on your part.Flatterworld (talk) 09:08, 22 April 2008 (UTC)

Glad this worked out. I now know who to talk to when I have questions about my political articles. :-) Unfortunately, I don't remember which articles were in that other format. If I run across them again, I'll update them.Flatterworld (talk) 21:31, 22 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Parashah

Hi, the parashah article is about spacing divisions in the masoretic text. The standard modern Weekly Torah portions are much later, but they nearly always coincide with a space division (as is noted in the article). The relationship between parashah divisions and public reading in the synagogue is discussed in the halakhah section (which largely deals with the period before such readings were fully standardized.

But I take your point that there could be more in the article about how parashot relate to or coincide with other divisions. Dovi (talk) 20:49, 29 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Re: Hasmos

Hi Kaisershatner, thank you for the note. I usually have between 5 and 30 wiki-windows open at any given time, doing research related to my World History Maps. When reading any articles, if I see a way to improve it (even in minor ways), I do it as best as I can. (In this case, someone pointed out that my map of 100 BC was missing Judea, and they are right. So researching Judea I found out about the Hasmoneans. I'm almost finished updating the Image:East-Hem_100bc.jpg map and hope to have it's updated version uploaded to Wikipedia by tonight.) Respectfully, Thomas Lessman (talk) 17:57, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] user:24.176.36.149

Hi I think this user should be blocked for a lot longer. All his edits were in bad faith and the user kept vandalizing after numerous warnings.Bit Lordy (talk) 17:24, 29 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] cleanup of Killian

Hey Firs, just a silly error, but your correction in Killian documents altered a direct quotation of a cited reference. I agree with you and AWB that the wording is better your way, but obviously we can't change how it was said in the original.  :) Cheers, Kaisershatner (talk) 13:29, 30 May 2008 (UTC)

Hi Kaiser,
Thanks for your friendly note. Obviously, sourced direct quotes shouldn't be altered. Thanks for reverting the mistake. I was actually watching for direct quotes, but missed this. Thanks so much for fixing the blunder. Best wishes and happy editing, Firsfron of Ronchester 20:53, 30 May 2008 (UTC)