User talk:Kaihsu

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

previous: 2007

Contents

[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:EU Presidency Logo UK2005.png

Thanks for uploading Image:EU Presidency Logo UK2005.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 06:21, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] AfD nomination of Margot James

An editor has nominated Margot James, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Margot James (2nd nomination) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 14:29, 8 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] CfD nomination of Category:Recipients of the Right Livelihood Award

Category:Recipients of the Right Livelihood Award, which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. – -- It's usually much better to list award recipients in the article about that award, rather than in a category -- they can be referenced, annotated, sorted, and policed for exclusions or inclusions much better in the article than in the category. If you have questions, please feel free to ping my talk page, and please feel free to join in the CFD discussion. Cheers, --Lquilter (talk) 21:03, 15 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Seminal work

Another editor has added the {{prod}} template to the article Seminal work, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 18:01, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Gptlogo.png

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Gptlogo.png. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Project FMF (talk) 22:42, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Speedy deletion of Mweb

A tag has been placed on Mweb requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must include on the external site the statement "I, (name), am the author of this article, (article name), and I release its content under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 and later." You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Samuell Lift me up or put me down 01:08, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Speedy deletion of St. Valentine

A tag has been placed on St. Valentine requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for musical topics.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 22:08, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Collapsable sections

Hi! You have done considerable work on the {{Christian Democracy}}. There has been considerable discussion on the issue of the collapsable sections of templates like that one. I created a centralized place for discussion about this issue here. I hope you can bring your views to the discussion. - C mon (talk) 18:23, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image infringes Crown copyright

Image:Oxford Lord Mayoralty Royal Proclamation copyright Kaihsu Tai 20080228.jpg is a reproduction of a document subject to Crown copyright, and its display on Wikipedia infringes that copyright. Please remove it.GSTQ (talk) 05:13, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Blocking of User:24.146.16.150

Hello. I entirely support your blocking of this vandal/troll. But did you have specific reasons for imposing a block for a whole year? Would you object if I reduced it to a week? Best wishes, RobertG ♬ talk 11:53, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Talk:Henley Visa Restrictions Index

Please delete Talk:Henley Visa Restrictions Index. If you don't do so quickly, I shall.

For Henley Visa Restrictions Index, see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Henley Visa Restrictions Index. For its content, see www.henleyglobal.com/visa_restrictions.htm. If you disagree with the AfD, please bring the matter up at Wikipedia:Deletion review. Thank you. -- Hoary (talk) 13:46, 23 April 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for having deleted it as suggested. -- Hoary (talk) 15:14, 23 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] London Meetups - Sunday May 11th

We're hoping to have regular meetups in London. The next one is on May 11th Wikipedia:Meetup/London 9. Another Sunday lunch in Holborn. Come along! -- Harry Wood (talk) 11:27, 28 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Radical cleric

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Radical cleric, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Radical_cleric. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 13:11, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Proposed deletion of Toby Horton

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Toby Horton, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Terraxos (talk) 03:48, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Right Honourable at Tony McNulty

I was going on what I saw at Right Honourable. is there another convention for Wikipedia? ninety:one 20:22, 10 June 2008 (UTC)

See Talk:The_Right_Honourable#points. – Kaihsu (talk) 20:23, 10 June 2008 (UTC)