Talk:Kahless
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
| This article is part of WikiProject Star Trek, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to all Star Trek-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. | |
| ??? | This article has not yet received a rating on the quality scale. |
| ??? | This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale. |
This entry is one of only seventeen that have won the March 2005 West Dakota Prize for successfully employing the expression "legend states" in a complete sentence. --Wetman 08:24, 6 Mar 2005 (UTC)
This entry, one of an unprecedented 52, has won the September 2005 West Dakota Prize, awarded for successfully employing the expression "legend states" in a complete sentence.
Contents |
[edit] Kahless & his Clone
Just nitpicking, should we describe the 2 Kahless's as Kahless I & Kahless II? Does Star Trek? GoodDay 23:08, 29 November 2005 (UTC)
I think there should be a difference between the clone of Kahless and Kahless him self. I think it is believed that Kahless will return and lead the Klingon Empire to a great victory. This is what cloners of Kahless were banking on when clonning Kahless to gain power. I don't think there is any direct referance to any numbering system in Star Trek. Although I could be wrong.
- There is in fact a separate article on Kahless II - we need to either merge the two, or move the Kahless clone material over to the other article. -- Beardo 22:58, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
[edit] proper pronunciation
requesting a lay person's plain pro-nun-see-ay-shun guide.
please and thanks! :)
- If memory serves correctly, it's pronounced like KAY-lessoknazevad 07:45, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Kahless good or bad?
I restored the part about Kahless being on the good side instead of the evil side if the story in Savage Curtain were to be played out in the Next Generation era. During the TOS era, all of the information on Klingons, including Kahless, came from highly prejudiced sources. And the image seen in that episode was obviously based on Kirk's ignorance. He didn't even know what the real Kahless looked like. In the Next Generation era, Worf is our eyes and ears on Klingon lore. There is a reason why Worf's tale of Kahless includes a true bad-guy in the tyrant Molor. To reinforce the fact that the true Klingon way is honor,truth, and other good-guy stuff. As a result, all of the evil Klingons, such as Duras, are percieved as acting dishonorably or in ways that the real Kahless would not approve.Mr. ATOZ 17:46, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
Sorry, I should have read this discussion and commented before I deleted it - but stand by my decision (and my edit sumary). This is purely speculation (read: original research) about a fictional character in a fictional universe. I think it would be a very valid point to make in a Star Trek encyclopedia, but this is not that place. -- Pawl 03:07, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Nice
Someone deleted all but one of the article's pictures. =[ SakotGrimshine 15:40, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Other Info Section
I added the info stating Kahless was a part of the Star Trek CCG.
