Talk:Kaguya (mouse)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Japan, a project to improve all Japan-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other Japan-related articles, please join the project. All interested editors are welcome. |
| Start | This article has been rated as Start-Class on the assessment scale. |
| ??? | This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale. |
|
Japan To-do:
|
|
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mammals, a project to improve Wikipedia's articles on Mammal-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details. | ||
| Start | This article has been rated as Start-class on the quality scale. | ||
| ??? | This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale. | ||
|
Assessment comments
|
|||
Contents |
[edit] Primary Kaguya Article
Not that this isn't a fascinating article, but this is the first article that pops up when you search for Kaguya on wikipedia. Wouldn't it make more sense for the primary article to be related to the original Japanese legend, and for this page to be moved to an appropriate alternate location? 68.148.224.47 08:38, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Surety
I am unsure of the veracity of these statements:
This is not a cloned animal because cells from two individuals are used
and
the process used starts with genetically modified mice
First, as far as I have read, there is nothing that says that the cells came from different individuals, only that they were different cells, one taken immaturely and the other taken later. Nonetheless, the processes involved in meiosis would still ensure that it was not a clone.
Second, the mice themselves are not genetically modified, only the eggs — as far as I have read.
-moogle 05:15, 22 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Disambiguation here?
[edit] Modified eggs?
I have read the original paper published in Nature magazine. As far as I remember 2 individuals were used, one was mutant and other one normal. So they took premature egg from young mutant and mature egg from normal adult mouse. I am not sure how do you mean eggs can be mofified (dna of eggs)? They created modified animal that produced modified eggs...
If they used 2 normal animals placenta wouldnt develop properly because of paternal and maternal imprints. So I wondered if someone can tell me, is it theoretically possible to create normal individual by gene therapy which means silencing matriline and amplifying paternally expressed genes without changing their DNA, and can those offspring be fertile?
Thanks
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Mouse 180.jpg
Image:Mouse 180.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 06:57, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
