User talk:Kabul-Shahan2020

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, Kabul-Shahan2020, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! --Strothra (talk) 18:00, 10 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Sockpuppetry case

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Beh-nam (2nd) for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. Cronholm144 16:39, 13 December 2007 (UTC)


I am giving you a heads-up I left a note on User talk:Cronholm144. I don't like it when people use sockpuppets. We should all stand behind what we express, with no trickery. I hope you aren't a sockpuppet. Cheers! Geo Swan (talk) 15:44, 14 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] please see...

Please see this comment

This edit to Talk:Mazari Sharif would have had the unfortunate effect of disappearing a lot of current discussion. I reverted it. You left some comments on Talk:Mazar-e Sharif, which are now unlikely to ever be seen by anyone. If you think they are important feel free to transplant them to Talk:Mazari Sharif.

Feel free to initiate a discussion about renaming the article on Mazari Sharif.

But, please, don't rename articles, without discussing it first.

Cheers! Geo Swan (talk) 15:30, 14 December 2007 (UTC)

I replied to your latest.
Cheers! Geo Swan (talk) 17:44, 14 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] December 2007

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Rjd0060 (talk) 04:53, 15 December 2007 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. east.718 at 05:43, December 15, 2007 05:43, 15 December 2007 (UTC)