Talk:Kabhi Alvida Naa Kehna

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is within the scope of the following WikiProjects:

WikiProject Albums      (Rated Start-Class) This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. Start This article has been rated as Start-class on the quality scale. ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale. The article has been rated for quality and/or importance but has no comments yet. If appropriate, please review the article and then leave comments here to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article and what work it will need. WikiProject Films     (Rated Start-Class) Film Portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Films. This project is a central gathering of editors working to build comprehensive and detailed articles for film topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale. ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the priority scale. Editing Guidelines Please remember these guidelines when editing a film article: If a non-film article already exists with the name of the film that you are trying to create an article for, disambiguate and use (film) in the title: Film Title (film) For more information see: Wikipedia:Naming conventions (films) When writing an article about a particular film, the general format should be a concise lead section, followed by a plot summary of no more than 900 words, production details, a cast list, a reception section, and references. Create an Infobox that tells all pertinent information about the film. Additional Information: This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-Class status: Referencing and citation: not checked Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: not checked Grammar: not checked Supporting materials: not checked To fill out this checklist, please add the following to the template call: <!-- 1. It is suitably referenced, and all major points are appropriately cited. --> |B-Class-1=yes/no <!-- 2. It reasonably covers the topic, and does not contain major omissions or inaccuracies. --> |B-Class-2=yes/no <!-- 3. It has a defined structure, including a lead section and one or more sections of content. --> |B-Class-3=yes/no <!-- 4. It is free from major grammatical errors. --> |B-Class-4=yes/no <!-- 5. It contains appropriate supporting materials, such as an infobox, images, or diagrams. --> |B-Class-5=yes/no Related task forces (nations and regions): Indian cinema task force WikiProject Indian cinema (Rated Start-Class) This article is within the scope of WikiProject Indian cinema, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Indian cinema. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page. WikiProject India (Rated Start-Class) This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page. Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale. (add comments) More information about this article... ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

Contents 1 Box Office 2 Urmila Matondkar 3 Mid-day article 4 Please do not post wrong information! 5 Regarding Urmilla being in the film 6 Cast names 7 Synopsis 8 Cast and Plot 9 Character names 10 KANK CHARACTER NAMES 11 SYNOPSIS 12 Synopsis deleting 13 Citations 14 New York Times 15 Great movie, no? 16 Sloppy & unsourced sentence about "poor word of mouth" 17 Controversy 18 WikiProject class rating

[edit] Box Office

27 crores is the net gross.Lets just stick to the total gross since most movies in wikipedia have just raw gross(ie 72 crores in 1 week according to THE HINDU 21st Aug.

[edit] Urmila Matondkar

Urmila Matdgdgondkar is NOT in this film. IMDB has posted wrong information. Cast of KANK, that has been officially posted on the Dharma Prodcution website does not include Urmila.

i watched the movie today and the film is really good, no urmilla is not in the picture and ranis name is maya, she looks and has acted brilliantly

[edit] Mid-day article

Mid-day has used trivia section from this website in one of their articles.

[edit] Please do not post wrong information!

A number of people have been posting wrong or irrelevant information on this page. Please stop doing so.

[edit] Regarding Urmilla being in the film

Please quote sources who has confirmed Urmilla being in the film. --Soumyasch 10:39, 14 February 2006 (UTC)

IMDb says that Urmila Matondkar is in this movie. I seriously doubt that Dharma Productions would list the entire cast & crew for the sake of cameos. Anyways, IndiaFM.com has posted entirely different information (also, when it comes to the names of the characters), so I guess the cast will be open for debate until the day the movie is finally released. I suggest we wait until then (maybe the Kajol-fact will be confirmed, too, or not). --Plumcouch 16:49, 14 February 2006 (UTC)

Kajol does appear in KANK, standing beside a piano dancing with Amitabh and Abhishek Bachchan, during the song "Rock And Roll Soniye." There are a handful of clips of it at YouTube.com Pellmelody 00:51, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Cast names

Dev, Maya, Rishi(nickname for Rishabh) and Sam are the official cast names.

[edit] Synopsis

The synopsis section has been copied from IMDb. It amounts to copyright infringement. It should be either drastically reworded or quoted to IMDb. Otherwise the page may get labelled with a copyright violation tag. --Soumyasch 06:02, 25 February 2006 (UTC)

It sounds like an advert as well. --Soumyasch 06:25, 26 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Cast and Plot

There plot summary is inconsistent in the names of the charcters - Rani mukerji is referred to as bot Shalini and Maya. So can someone please give references from where the plot summary is found? It will help solve the problem once and for all. --Soumyasch 06:03, 10 March 2006 (UTC)

There needs to be some rewriting done on the character descriptions. They reflect a bias towards particular characters without giving a true defination on the characters and his/her motivations, esp. the character write up for "Sexy Sam". It reflects the writer's personal opinions, not a true, neutral description. Pellmelody 00:45, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Character names

The last line of Plot summary refereed to the charcters off SRK and Rani as Dev and Maya, but the rest of the article as Jai and Shalini. I am updating the last line to be in sync with the rest. Tha names of characters referred to in this article, have been changed many times, reflecting the confusion surrounding. So please cite references before modifying the said info further. Please modify the article if you find a credible source giving the names of the characters. --Soumyasch 06:09, 10 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] KANK CHARACTER NAMES

RANI is MAYA. SRK is DEV. ABHISHEK is RISHI. AMITABH is SAM

PREITY is RHEA/RIYA (INDIA FM). KIRRON KHER AND ARJUN RAMPAL - GUEST APPEARANCE - NAME UNKNOWN

[edit] SYNOPSIS

Is there a verifiable source to the synopsis? Bollywoodbombay 22:00, 21 June 2006 (UTC)Bollywoodbombay

It seems as if anon 82.36.141.124, does not want the synopsis. I don't think anyone else has a problem with the synopsis being there. Anyone who is interested please come to discuss, and anon if you are reading this can you please explain why you don't want the synopsis. Also why did you remove the still. Pa7 13:13, 22 June 2006 (UTC)

Should the synopsis be this long? A synopsis is supposed to be brief. - unni 01:12, 5 July 2006 (UTC)

I second that... the synopsis is almost as long as the movie... Looks like the film's PR came and wrote it. Can we do something about it? Anagha 06:19, 13 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Synopsis deleting

hey im the one who deleted the synopsis, sorry guys didnt know you were soo dedicated! Anyway the reason being is that i dont think its right to give the story away for all those who dont want to know it. If youre intrigued by the story then you should keep it to yourself. Anyway just want to apologise and it wont happen again. Cant wait for the film to relaese and i havent read the synopsis so lookin forward to a surprise storyline.

[edit] Citations

This article does not cite the origins from which the Director's Note and the quotes in the Trivia section are derived from. - unni 01:18, 5 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] New York Times

This movie was talked about in regards to a new trend in Bollywood diverging from more traditional values. Here is a copy online. I figured it's about the most notable source we usually get for Bollywood films. gren グレン 05:02, 6 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Great movie, no?

Opinions?

[edit] Sloppy & unsourced sentence about "poor word of mouth"

The media has said the film has a poor word of mouth but this is not true unless they have made this film a special case and are talking about the word of mouth in places like Hissar or Hanumangarh when normally for every film its Mumbai or Delhi.

Besides this being an unclear run-on sentence, it needs sourcing. Which media outlets or writers or commentators are referred to? What counter-evidence do we have that it has good word of mouth in spite of said unnamed media sources saying it has poor word of mouth? --Jim Henry 23:01, 18 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Controversy

Someone more knowledgeable than me should add something about the controversy surrounding the movie ... There was even an article in a Norwegian newspaper mentioning this (as one of their "strange facts from abroad" features)... I don't know how much there is too this though.

Houshuang 05:08, 10 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] WikiProject class rating

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 19:26, 28 August 2007 (UTC)