User talk:K69
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] License tagging for Image:Ketamina.jpeg
Thanks for uploading Image:Ketamina.jpeg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 06:05, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] not funny
Please stop. If you continue to vandalise pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did to Don Imus, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Tvoz |talk 06:31, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
- You're entitled to your opinion about Imus, but what you posted was not a constructive edit. Tvoz |talk 06:37, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
- And further, your article citation clearly did nothing to support your point, so my conclusion remains that you were vandalizing. If you continue, I have no doubt you'll be blocked - so maybe you should move onto something else. Tvoz |talk 06:42, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Notability of Arizona Association of Licensed Private Investigators
A tag has been placed on Arizona Association of Licensed Private Investigators, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is notable, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (below the existing db tag) and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.
For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. greenrd 20:40, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Nine Lives Association
Another editor has added the "{{prod}}" template to the article Nine Lives Association, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Oo7565 19:34, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
[edit] American College of Forensic Examiners Institute
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on American College of Forensic Examiners Institute, by 650l2520, another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because American College of Forensic Examiners Institute fits the criteria for speedy deletion for the following reason:
To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting American College of Forensic Examiners Institute, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note, this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate American College of Forensic Examiners Institute itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 23:34, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
[edit] damn schnigga
hook a brotha up with dat special k —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.140.146.19 (talk) 01:59, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Hey!
You seem to like ketamine and Ron Paul! I like you, let's be friends. Miserlou (talk) 06:07, 26 December 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:More you know 69.jpg
Thank you for uploading Image:More you know 69.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 12:14, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Indoor rowing
The link you added was to a multi-gym which had a rowing like function, it was not an indoor rower. However the list of manufacturers was not actually a good part of the article so I have removed it. --Nate1481(t/c) 17:01, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] My talkpage
Please refactor your comment on my talkpage. Cirt (talk) 17:28, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] The Profit
With regard to your latest edits to the article - I request that you please revert these back to the previous version. These are all not satisfactory sources for Wikipedia, and this will jeopardize my efforts at trying to get this article to WP:GA-quality status. Thanks, Cirt (talk) 03:07, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
- I'd rather you revert your edits and remove that info yourself. I'll add it back in when a better source comes out. Cirt (talk) 03:54, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Attack
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on this page, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because the article is a page created primarily to disparage its subject or a biography of a living person that is controversial in tone and unsourced, where there is no neutral point of view version in the history to revert to. (CSD G10).
To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting the article, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note, this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate the article itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. CSDWarnBot (talk) 09:01, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:More you know 69.jpg
Hi K69!
We thank you for uploading Image:More you know 69.jpg, but there is a problem. Your image is currently missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. Unless you can help by adding a copyright tag, it may be deleted by an Administrator. If you know this information, then we urge you to add a copyright tag to the image description page. We apologize for this, but all images must confirm to policy on Wikipedia.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks so much for your cooperation.
This message is from a robot. --John Bot III (talk) 17:07, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
[edit] April 2008
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source, as you did to Scientology controversies, is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. This type of material you have added to this article is an obvious violation of WP:NOR. Cirt (talk) 03:21, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
[edit] May 2008
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, one or more of the external links you added to the page Phytochemical do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Binksternet (talk) 15:03, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to XanGo. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. Binksternet (talk) 15:03, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Tango (dance). It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Binksternet (talk) 15:03, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Hey!
You seem pretty cool! :) why so many warnings though? Are the wiki-zionists on your back? Man im british and looking for some k aswell, sounds awesome never tried it lolz ΤΕΡΡΑΣΙΔΙΩΣ(Ταλκ) 01:48, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
