Talk:K. A. Paul
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
As a biography of a living person, editors of this article should be careful to avoid loaded terms like "leader of a doomsday sect," and "leader of the cult." These are obviously POV and unacceptable. Edison 23:18, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
Expanded the article and added some references. Still need: 1)year of birth: news articles only state his age.2)Family details: has wife and children. 3)Any books written.Edison 17:53, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
Edison I am working on it if you can give me some more time I would surelu update it.rencin24
I did my best and got finally his birth details. Hope it is ok??? Edision??rencin24 rencin24 13:55, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
Contents |
[edit] Rencin24
Edision, If you did not notice just in case....I have put that link in the last session' External Links . You can further modify it.rencin24
I HAD TO PUT THESE POINTS OR RATHER FEW WORDS OF INSTRUCTIONS TO ALL THE PEOPLE HERE AFTER GOING THROUGH WHAT I READ BELOW. FIRST OF ALL.
1. PLEASE SIGN IN YOUR NAME IF YOU ARE A USER AND IF YOUR NOT THEN PLEASE ADD FOUR SYMBOLS " ~ " OF THIS KIND.
2. IF YOU ARE PUTTING IN ANY COMENTS OR EVEN AN INFORMATION THEN PLEASE DO CITE THE REFERENCE BELOW.
3. ALSO REMEMBER THAT THIS PLACE IS NOT A PLACE TO ARGUE OR FIGHT BUT TO KNOW AND TO CONTRIBUTE INFORMATIONS INTO THIS SITE.
THANK YOU, RENCIN MATTHEW. rencin24 rencin24 16:08, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] POV edit
To anyone who's watching this page: I just reverted this from the article, as it seems a little too POV. If the concern stated in the edit is genuine, someone may wish to reword it and work it into the article?
Cheers, riana_dzasta 12:53, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
--WikiFanDec18--
I removed three sentences in total, because they do not cite any references. Secondly, there are written in very bad English. Thirdly, they are primarily intended to slander the person rather than putting forward facts. —Preceding unsigned comment added by WikiFanDec18 (talk • contribs) 08:02, 11 June 2007
[edit] Added category
Added Indian Christians category--71.30.177.228 07:55, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Unimportant person
This person has not been known to be of any importance, either in a political or in a religious sense. There's simply no reason to have an article about him here. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.254.232.182 (talk • contribs) 06:00, 13 June 2007 This person is believed to be a key player in paid religion conversions in India.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Jaimalleshk (talk • contribs) 16:18, 20 July 2007
[edit] Edited the Last version
Please cite references when you accuse some one of anything. Do not just say ," He's known to have three wives and he married them after impregnating them". This site is not a front to show your personal indigination or whatever. This is an encyclopedia. Substantiate your words with proper evidence. If you want to slander this person, please , this is not the right place. Whatever you write must be 'verifiable'. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.145.136.1 (talk • contribs) 10:10, 13 June 2007
[edit] Editied the Last version
Why do not the people understand? This is an online free encyclopedia. If you want to abuse a public personality, then please do so by setting up your own website.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.145.136.1 (talk • contribs) 07:37, 15 June 2007
[edit] Deletions of sourced material
Interspersed with recent vandalism and WP:BLP violations, there was a deletion of a large section of well sourced material [1] which did not get reverted. The deletion was don without any discussion here and without a comment noting the basis on which it was based on Wikipedia policies and guidelines, I will add it back. Thanks. Edison 17:35, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] WikiProject class rating
This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 18:21, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
[edit] KA PAUL
This article on K.A.Paul looks like an advertisement and should be removed. The words sound more like a advertising campaign for the man who is shrouded in controversy. How come this articles doesnt have any information about his tax defaults and scandals? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Musicshop13 (talk • contribs) 12:22, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] ==
I've removed the following extract:
Kilary Anand ['Dr.' Paul] appears to be nothing but a third grade impostor. He certainly does not qualify to be called Christian if his reported misdemeanors are indeed true. He is variously reported to have cheated people, sexually molested under-age girls and air hostesses. He shows absolutely NO Christian qualities/virtues whatsoever and so, in all probability, he is just one crook pretending to be a Christian to feed his family and his ego.
There is no record of his having obtained a PhD from any university. Most likely the 'Dr.' title is a fake!
While it may for all I know be true, it's clearly not encyclopedic, let alone NPOV; even if they're worth including anything reiterating the same claims would need to be rewritten from scratch rather than based on this, I think. Donald Ian Rankin (talk) 18:23, 13 May 2008 (UTC)