User talk:Jwray

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Project Chanology

Regarding this video, I won't push you on going back and forth removing it and putting it back, re: citing it as a source in the article. But I'm just telling you from my own personal experience of getting articles to Good Article status and Featured Article status - it will be much better for the article in the long run if we keep "Message to Scientology" in the External Links section - and yet not use it as a source in the article itself, and instead rely on secondary sources that discuss the video - of which there are plenty and will continue to be more and more. Cirt (talk) 03:59, 28 January 2008 (UTC)

Thank you. I assure you as more information about the video's stats become available in secondary sources, it will be added to the article, for great justice. Cheers, Cirt (talk) 05:46, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for adding the {{controversial}} tag, smart move - though I doubt it will stop anon-ips and new users from adding unsourced stuff, conjecture, etc. Cirt (talk) 07:44, 29 January 2008 (UTC)


[edit] {{Russia-politics-stub}}

Hi - I see you have recently created one or more new stub types. As it states at Wikipedia:Stub, at the top of most stub categories, and in many other places on Wikipedia, it is recommended that new stub types are proposed prior to creation at Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting/Proposals, in order to check whether the new stub type is already covered by existing stub types, whether it is named according to stub naming guidelines, whether it is otherwise correctly formatted, whether it reaches the standard threshold for creation of a new stub type, and whether it crosses existing stub type hierarchies. Your new stub type is currently listed at WP:WSS/D - please feel free to make any comments there as to any rationale for this stub type. And please, in future, consider proposing new stub types first! Grutness...wha? 01:24, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Muhammad

Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to Muhammad, but we regretfully cannot accept original research. Original research also encompasses novel, unpublished syntheses of previously published material. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your information. Thank you. silly rabbit (talk) 23:39, 23 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] POV tags

Hi, please note that the article Tahrif was already tagged for neutrality. Furthermore, it is not enough to tag an article {{POV}}. You must also post specific issues on the talk page. Finally, please use an edit summary when tagging an article, indicating the section of the talk page where you have posted your discussion. Thanks! silly rabbit (talk) 23:46, 23 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] No child's behind left

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article No child's behind left, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Deadly∀ssassin 06:38, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] New Message

Hello, Jwray. You have new messages at DeadlyAssassin's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} template.