User talk:Jvsett
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] california historical landmark
please try to do your research better before editing...especially deleting factual data. the moss beach distillery is indeed a california historical landmark, registered with the state of california. if you have ever been there you might notice the very large plaque on the front with the official presentation of this information. here is a link to a web site with a photo of the front of the building showing the plaque:http://www.mindreader.com/distillery/index.htm Anlace 23:07, 16 March 2006 (UTC)
- Please make sure you do your research better before you accuse me of not doing my research. At best, Moss Beach Distillery is a California Point of Historical Interest. However, it is not a CHL
--Jvsett 00:00, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
[edit] california historical landmark
i think you are correct on this. im glad i had a close up photo of the plaque to show you are correct. the plaque is almost identical in size shape and color to the real thing :) there is a link to a web site with a photo of the front of the building showing the plaque:http://www.mindreader.com/distillery/index.htm Anlace 23:07, 16 March 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Suggestion
I noticed your edit to the Best Picture page, removing Letters from Iwo Jima from the controversy section. Perhaps you would want to expand the reason for the deletion that you used in your edit summary, and add it to the article. If an editor made the mistake putting it in the article, surely other readers are also under the misapprehension it should/ could be nominated fro best foreign language film. Jeffpw 05:16, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:2003937689.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:2003937689.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 05:33, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Orphaned non-free media (Image:2003937689.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:2003937689.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 15:41, 20 October 2007 (UTC)