User talk:Justinmeister

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

You have recently created the article Tom Hess. This was deleted in accordance with Wikipedia's deletion policies. Please do not re-create the article: if you disagree with the article's deletion, you may ask for a review at Wikipedia:Deletion review.

I see you have already been contacted about recreating this material. Please see our guideline at WP:MUSIC. Mr. Hess seems to fail the guideline. Please do not recreate the article. User:Zoe|(talk) 02:33, 8 August 2006 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] Homo erectus

What would be the problem if a 9th grader wrote the article? that was a poor comment to leave on the cleanup list, you would have been better off just putting the template on the page and not noting it on WP:cleanup. If you have a problem with someone's style, fix it and offer them feedback for how to improve, rather than shooting them down (even with a generalisation). Garrie 01:36, 15 August 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for the note on my page. Looking at the history of both the article and the talk page it looked like you had left that comment. Sorry if that was not the case. Garrie 22:57, 15 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Patton Creek Shopping Center

I have posted a comment at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Patton Creek Shopping Center arguing that there are significant differences among different shopping malls. You may want to reply there. --TruthbringerToronto (Talk | contribs) 07:41, 3 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] re: Talk:Censorship

I honestly have no idea how your edit got deleted. I only intended to remove some trolling comments that were much higher up on the Talk page. I did that last night as a section edit so it should not have even been possible to affect your comment since it was so much farther down the page. I think this might have just been a database hiccup but you have my sincere apologies anyway. I have replaced your comment on the page. Rossami (talk) 16:31, 7 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Hendrix article

I found the first three subsections to be written in a unencyclopedic tone, it's written like it's a book (a skim through the sections and you'll see what I mean). If you could copyedit these sections and remove the words that make it sound like it's a book, that'd be great :) HK51 21:02, 23 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Accidental deletion of comment

Hey, buddy, you kind of stepped on me at talk:Law of supply and demand. I restored my comment after yours, so "no harm, no foul". Take care! :-) --Uncle Ed 22:05, 26 January 2007 (UTC)