User talk:Just64helpin/Archive 7

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Archive This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Contents

Internal links

Did you fix it or delete it. You sent me a comment about the See also section and i wonder if you fixed it. Also haven't we met up before? Oh yeah!!! We did. I am the same person who attempted to creat the Stop'N'Swop page. well nice meeting you again!!!--Anfish (talk) 12:50, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

Thranjo-Kazooie

2 things.

1. I was trying to make it so Thranjo-Kazooie would redirect to it. Which by the way I already figured that out

2. It does so exist look-->Thranjo-Kazooie--Anfish (talk) 13:13, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

Starlet Edit

I would like to challenge your edit revert of the Wii article.

From this point in time I'd say that the existence of the Starlet is undeniable. [1]--coolbho3000 (talk) 01:25, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

Banjo-Kazoie:Nuts and Bolts

It has been confirmed that the change on Banjo-Kazooie:Nuts and Bolts are true, and I think that next time you should seek farther and see if something is true before just changing it. This is considered vandalism.--Anfish (talk) 00:03, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

Guess what!!!! Banjo-Kazooie: Nuts & Bolts now has a title card so there is all the prove I can throw at ya!!! Look at the page here!!! Also look here!!! Official Banjo-Kazooie: Nuts & Bolts website --Anfish (talk) 23:20, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

Sorry. . .What's Speculation????--Anfish (talk) 00:03, 14 May 2008 (UTC)

Oh, so it is.

My bad, I've been thinking it's been "Release the BEAT" for years. That's what I get for updating at work with limited access :P Reason turns rancid (talk) 02:12, 17 May 2008 (UTC)


Pictures

I wasn't making them massive. I was trying to make it so people could see it easier. A lot of people were complaining about the size. So I increased the size a bit so it would be easier.--Anfish (talk) 00:06, 19 May 2008 (UTC)

I have contact to lots of people. They all are on Wikipedia all the time. They contact me all the time. They do this because they know that I help wikipedia. They have no time to edit wikipedia 24/7. So they contact me by text, email, phone, personal approach, al sorts of stuff. Why do you ask this? |:(Anfish (talk) 00:19, 19 May 2008 (UTC)

What-ev--Anfish (talk) 00:21, 19 May 2008 (UTC)

No I haven't thought about that. Thanks!!! On the other hand. Those lots of people are not part of wikipedia. They have no time to edit it. They can only get on it to see what goes on. So they contact me so I can change it. Also sorry about the parometer. Again, I am sort of new to this so don't get pushy. You weren't being pushy, I am just warning you. Maybe in a few months I'll get better. By the way, why can't we change the size. In my opinion that is kind of ridiculous. If anything goes wrong with my edits please inform me.--Anfish (talk) 00:32, 19 May 2008 (UTC)

I'm not trying to be lazy. But . . . why didn't you change the image of Banjo and Kazooie smaller. it's the same as before. ??????? --Anfish (talk) 00:36, 19 May 2008 (UTC)

Sorry-Geeze.--Anfish (talk) 00:57, 19 May 2008 (UTC)

Sorry-Geeze.--Anfish (talk) 12:48, 19 May 2008 (UTC)

Woops accidently posted twice.--Anfish (talk) 12:48, 19 May 2008 (UTC)

No offense but the pictures are the same size before. Oh and by the way, no need to say sorry. I finally was able to exlpain to everybody that the size of the pix could not be changed. Thanks for your help. I won't be messing with pix for a while.--Anfish (talk) 22:16, 19 May 2008 (UTC)

Woops never mind.--Anfish (talk) 22:18, 19 May 2008 (UTC)

I'm very very very very very sorry. But I think I am misinterpreting. Are qwe supposed to put it at a certain size or does it have to be smaller than it is in the image discription. I am kind of confused. Sorry again.--Anfish (talk) 23:54, 23 May 2008 (UTC)

Oh very true!!!--Anfish (talk) 00:05, 24 May 2008 (UTC)

Piddles

Yes we are on the same page. Yes you are absolutely correct but wouldn't it state The new sidekick?????--Anfish (talk) 22:14, 20 May 2008 (UTC)

Are you there you haven't responded. You see I was wondering. If they were announcing the new characters wouldn't they be mentioning that there was a new sidekick. Plus they haven't said a single thing about him anywhere else. Also isn't it kind of weird how they mention Piddles but they don't mention that there is a new sidekick. I also think that they may have ment to put down Pikelet but accidentally put down the word Piddles instead. I don't know but when we get into farther detail I highly suggest we atleast mention him on the page better yet I will do it right now!!!!--Anfish (talk) 20:36, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

French house

Dear Just64helpin, thanks for the help (again). Might I point out that WP:WTAF is an essay and not a guideline, which means that "editors are not obliged to follow it" (as stated at the top of the page). Moreover, if you'd know anything about French house you'd know that both Fred Falke and Lifelike are integral parts of the French house scene (more specifically the French touch movement), so just reverting my additions are not only rude (and not helping) but ignorant. And don't worry, I'll create the articles within the next couple of days. I've reverted back your changes. Yours sincerely, Sebisthlm (talk) 18:05, 30 May 2008 (UTC)

So, you deleted Fred Falke and Lifelike from the article again without so much as a comment on my page. You really have bad manners! Sebisthlm (talk) 00:25, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
First of all, who are you and what purpose do you serve around the electronic music articles besides fighting a crusade against red-links (which you just revert instead of changing to black links or, heaven forbid, create). Second of all, you're the one who now have reverted my additions three times ([2], [3] and [4]) and you're warning me of 3RR? On the red-links, I think in general that they are a good way to encourage people to create wanted articles. Since red-links also can be linked to, you can in a way see the need for an article by looking at how many links there are to a red-link. Now, it's clear that you don't agree with me on the advantages of red-links, but I must remind you that this is not your Wikipedia, not even your WP:Electronic music or WP:French house or whatever it is that you patrol. As I've said I'm about to create the articles on the subjects in question, but in the meantime they need to be in the FH article since they currently are two of the most important French House acts (If you'd know anything about the subject you'd know that). If you continue to remove my additions I will not hesitate to report you at WP:AN/3RR. Sebisthlm (talk) 01:13, 8 June 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:BKcoverart.jpeg)

Thanks for uploading Image:BKcoverart.jpeg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 10:20, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

Uhh wtf?

I DID NOTHING WRONG! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.64.207.129 (talk) 00:03, 3 June 2008 (UTC)