Talk:Justiniana Prima

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Justiniana Prima is part of the WikiProject Serbia, an attempt to build a comprehensive guide to Serbia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. If you are new to editing Wikipedia visit the welcome page so as to become familier with the guidelines. If you would like to participate, please join the project and help with our open tasks.
Stub This article has been rated as stub-Class on the Project's quality scale.
(If you rated the article please give a short summary at comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses.)
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
The German-language version of this article has been listed at Wikipedia:German-English translation requests. If you'd like to translate it, sign your name there, or, if you'd also like the article to be translated, sign your name there under "Supported:".

This template is obsolete. Click here to initiate a translation request as explained in Wikipedia:Translation







This city has nothing to do with serbai or the Leskovac.--Hevnonen 19:58, 7 May 2006 (UTC)

See the Wiki German version page and you'll notice that the remains of Justiniana prima are very well documented. I've visited the excavations site in summer 2004. Things are clear. Euratlas, nov 2006

I saw it, and put the translation request a year ago :-(. No response... Duja 16:39, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
I have tried a rough translation but being a German native speaker some stylistic polishing might be necessary. I concentrated on describing the importance of the city; details about certain buildings etc. can still be added. At least, now the article is more than a stub. --Proofreader 18:38, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
I removed the {{POV}} tag. It's been there over a year and has not generated sufficient support (aside from the original bare, unsourced assertion) during that time. All responses here have been in favor of the article as is. MishaPan 18:31, 16 July 2007 (UTC)