Talk:Justice (Star Trek: The Next Generation)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
| This article is part of WikiProject Star Trek, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to all Star Trek-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. | |
| ??? | This article has not yet received a rating on the quality scale. |
| ??? | This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale. |
[edit] Confused Episode
The first point about this episode is that it appears to be a retelling of another Star Trek episode entitled 'The Apple', but with a different ending, in which the Prime Directive is NOT violated. In 'The Apple', the people pray to a giant computerized god, which Kirk chooses to destroy, thus interfering with their culture. In 'Justice' their computerized god is left intact, and continues to govern their society.
The most confused aspect of this episode is over the meaning of the Prime Directive. The Prime Directive (a.k.a. non-interference directive) does not have anything to do with obeying the customs or laws of a planet per se, but has to do with not interfering with a culture's natural development. There are no precedents in Star Trek whereby the crew of a Star Ship has to obey the laws of any governmental body outside of the United Federation of Planets' member states, the laws and regulations of Star Fleet, and the laws of a non-member planet, if there is an explicit treaty with that planet. For example, in the episode of TOS 'Wolf in the Fold', Scotty is only put on trial after being accused of murder because there is a treaty with that planet. 'Justice' seems to show a muddled understanding by the writers about what the non-interference directive actually means.
Even in the event hypothetical case where a Star Ship crew should obey the laws governing a non-federation planet, simply breaking those laws would not, by itself, be a violation of the Prime Directive. This basic misunderstanding of the non-interference directive makes this episode extremely problematic.
The larger issue with 'Justice' is that there is no real literary value to the episode. Unlike the TOS episode 'A Private Little War', in which the prime directive is explicitly violated in order to balance a war on a primitive planet which, in turn, fights a domino-effect cold war between the Federation and the Klingon Empire thus explaining (justifying?) the Vietnam War, 'Justice' does little more than yank at the audiences' heart strings. While the audience may, or may not agree with the assertions made in 'A Private Little War', 'Justice' is little more than a Lifetime network production, where a mother is wringing her hands because she might lose her baby.
- It could have been better written, I would say. Instead of approaching it in the black-and-white of honouring or not honouring the Edo laws, Picard could have taken the tack of examining with Liator and Rivan why the rules are not explained to visitors, and whether the Edo "god" is also culpable for not prompting its children to explain it. The Edo "god" is, Data surmises, able to exist in multiple places at once, and must surely be aware of other life forms and the diversity of their law and punishment systems. Since "god" and the Edo neglected to explain the white fence rule, in the case of the first offender, allowances should be made, and the Edo encouraged to discuss appropriate disciplinary action agreeable with the Enterprise crew. I remember writing comments back in 1987, that Wesley might get "gardening detail" as "community service" to serve in lieu of the normal punishment. His Edo friend who threw the ball should also get the same sentence for not recognizing the danger before throwing the ball! GBC (talk) 06:43, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Awesome Prose
I'd like to commend the guy who wrote this part.
Picard steps forward announcing that "life itself is an exercise in exceptions", and to every living creature within the sound of his voice, "there can be no justice so long as laws are absolute!" Riker adds, "When has justice ever been as simple as a rulebook?" —Preceding unsigned comment added by Chipotlehero (talk • contribs)
[edit] Wesley not Picard's son
I removed a comment (which had a "citation needed" placed on it) from the Trivia section. I just watched this episode on the G4 Network (USA) on Friday, March 8, 2007. When Dr. Crusher and Capt. Picard are discussing Wesley's fate on the planet, this conversation takes place:
CRUSHER: What do you intend to do about my son? PICARD: He's being held safely until sundown. CRUSHER: When he faces execution! Althought he's committed no crime, atleast not one any sane orreasonable person would... PICARD: You saw what that thing was about to do. CRUSHER: I apologize sir, but this is very difficult for me. If he were your son, you'd be as frightened ... PICARD: But I am.
This was not a reference to Wesley being his child, but Picard being able to empathize her pain. Dr. Crusher wouldn't have said "If he were your son" if he was.
Anyways. Just FYI. 68.198.34.245 21:09, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
(This was made by me, including the deletion... moved to another browser and didn't realize I wasn't signed in! Bsheppard 21:14, 9 March 2007 (UTC))
- The original trivia never stated that Wesley was Picard's son, rather it was an unsourced statement that supposedly Roddenberry played around with the idea that Wesley would be revealed to be Picard's son in a future episode. This of course, never happened. Cyberia23 04:56, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
