Talk:June Wilkinson

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.
Biography Portal
Stub This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]
This article is supported by the Arts and Entertainment work group.
This article has been automatically assessed as Stub-Class by WikiProject Biography because it uses a stub template.
  • If you agree with the assessment, please remove {{WPBiography}}'s auto=yes parameter from this talk page.
  • If you disagree with the assessment, please change it by editing the class parameter of the {{WPBiography}} template, removing {{WPBiography}}'s auto=yes parameter from this talk page, and removing the stub template from the article.
Pornography Portal
This article is part of WikiProject Pornography, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to pornography-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]
Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

[edit] Worthy of inclusion?

How does being a playboy centerfold satisfy WP:PORNBIO? What is notable about posing naked in a magazine? 151.203.18.206 05:23, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

She meets the very first criteria: Performer has won or been a serious contender for a well-known award, such as those listed in Category:Adult movie awards or Category:Film awards or from a major pornographic magazine, such as Penthouse, Playboy, Hustler, Playgirl, or other well-known magazines, as well as their counterparts in other pornography genres (including feature of the month in these magazines). Dismas|(talk) 12:09, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
Ok, I see centerfold equals "feature of the month." Yes, you are correct. 151.203.18.206 16:22, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Removal of interview/sources

It totally flabbergasts me when someone removes a good, lengty source from a poorly-sourced article. Actually, I was going to use the source to improve this meagre article. But I've got other projects to attend to if actual sourcing is not desired at this one. Regards. Dekkappai (talk) 18:07, 12 December 2007 (UTC)