Talk:June Brigman

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article must adhere to the policy on biographies of living persons. Controversial material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted or if there are other concerns relative to this policy, report it on the living persons biographies noticeboard.

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.	Biography Portal
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]

This article has been automatically assessed as Stub-Class by WikiProject Biography because it uses a stub template. If you agree with the assessment, please remove {{WPBiography}}'s auto=yes parameter from this talk page. If you disagree with the assessment, please change it by editing the class parameter of the {{WPBiography}} template, removing {{WPBiography}}'s auto=yes parameter from this talk page, and removing the stub template from the article.

	comics Portal This article is in the scope of WikiProject Comics, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to comics on Wikipedia. Get involved! Help with current tasks, visit the notice board, edit the attached article or discuss it at the project talk page.
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the quality scale. Please explain the rating here.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
More information: This article has been automatically rated as Stub-Class because it uses a stub template. If you agree with the assessment, please remove |auto=yes from this template. If you disagree with the assessment, please change it by editing the |class= parameter in this template and removing the stub template from the article. This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-Class status: Referencing and citation: not checked Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: not checked Grammar: not checked Supporting materials: not checked To fill out this checklist, please add the following to the template call: <!-- 1. It is suitably referenced, and all major points are appropriately cited. --> |B-Class-1=yes/no <!-- 2. It reasonably covers the topic, and does not contain major omissions or inaccuracies. --> |B-Class-2=yes/no <!-- 3. It has a defined structure, including a lead section and one or more sections of content. --> |B-Class-3=yes/no <!-- 4. It is free from major grammatical errors. --> |B-Class-4=yes/no <!-- 5. It contains appropriate supporting materials, such as an infobox, images, or diagrams. --> |B-Class-5=yes/no Related work groups (general): Comics creators work group

[edit] Edit May 17th

I removed the following paragraph:

Too busy to bother drawing three new panels every day, Ms. Brigman frequently recycles the art from an earlier strip. (For example, compare: [1] with [2]). Many comic fans and cartoonists consider this to be lazy and unprofessional.

One of the links is not working, but I did find the mentioned strips on another website. Although it's true that Brigman has recycled a panel from the previous day, this is common practice for many syndicated comic strips, especially for adventure/continuity strips where the readers have to be reminded of the plotline. Bust most importantly, I find that this paragraph reeks of POV with words like "Too busy to bother" and "Many comic fans and cartoonists consider this to be lazy and unprofessional." AEriksson 09:49, 17 May 2006 (UTC)

         **It may be a common practice but that doesn't change the fact that "Many comic fans and cartoonists consider this to be lazy and unprofessional."

• • "Many comic fans and cartoonists consider this"? Please do not speak for us. You show little sophistication in your knowledge of visual arts by doing so. I recommend your review Robert Rauschenberg or Warhol to see that repitition of an image has reason and is not the result of laziness.67.82.13.55 06:53, 23 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] WikiProject class rating

This article was automatically assessed because at least one article was rated and this bot brought all the other ratings up to at least that level. BetacommandBot 23:01, 27 August 2007 (UTC)