User talk:Jumping cheese/Archive 5

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Archive This is an archive of Jumping cheese's past discussions. Please do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.
Thank you!
Talk archives for User:Jumping cheese (current talk page)
<< 1 < Archive 4 Archive 5 Archive 6 > 5 >>

Contents

[edit] The Happy Land

You asked me to tell you if that The Happy Land picture came back to FPC - I went back to the library, re-copied it, and now have a much, much crisper scan. Hence, I renominated it: Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/The Happy Land - Illustrated London News, March 22, 1873 - Renomination with better Scan Adam Cuerden talk 20:35, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image:American_Hi-Fi.jpg

I have tagged Image:American_Hi-Fi.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. MER-C 09:18, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image source problem with Image:Eric Burns.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:Eric Burns.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 07:21, 11 July 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. The image also has no fair use rationale and is replaceable as an image of a living person, and can also be deleted due to both of these. mattbr 07:21, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Neal_Gabler.jpg

I have tagged Image:Neal_Gabler.jpg as {{replaceable fair use}}. If you wish to dispute this assertion, please add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}} to the image description page and a comment explaining your reasoning to the the image talk page. – Quadell (talk) (random) 22:29, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Orphaned non-free image (Image:Kim Possible Team Possible.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Kim Possible Team Possible.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 18:56, 18 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Orphaned non-free image (Image:US Weekly.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:US Weekly.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 19:30, 18 July 2007 (UTC)


[edit] War on Terror (game)

Hello, thanks for your message regarding the War on Terror board game page. I understand that it is a political issue (naturally) and that's why I feel that one word (alleged) can make an enormous difference. From what I have read, heard and seen, there is no doubt whatsoever that the War on Terror is counter-productive. It almost feels silly to even argue the point, it seems so self-evident. However, if you give me some time, I'll come up with some references. The briefing paper you mention is just the introduction page to a much larger (and in-depth) report by the way. It makes for interesting reading and actually I think this is more than grounds enough for the claim in itself (ie. it's an independent, peer-reviewed study). Maybe you can help me out by letting me know what else would lend authoritative weight? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.6.104.229 (talk • contribs)

Following on from our discussion of whether the GWOT is counter-productive or not, you claim that it is not obvious to you that the war on terror is counter-productive, since you hear more about foiled terrorist plots than successful terrorist incidents. I find that hard to believe. In Iraq this year alone there have been 1680 separate US-reported terrorist incidents. Are you seriously saying you've heard of more than 1680 foiled terrorist plots in the same time-frame? To my mind, how can the GWOT be anything other than counter-productive based on Iraq alone? There used to be a country with no terrorist links. Now it is a country with among the highest concentrations of terrorist incidents in the world. This is directly contrary to the 'goals' of the GWOT and so counter-productive. Anyway, I have found plenty of material that is universally damning of the tactics and results of the GWOT. Many of these sources are senior intelligence and security officials, either still in employment, or having been in employment in the last three years. I could link to all of them, but I think that would be overkill considering the fact that the National Counterterrorism Center's database of terrorist incidents shows a clear and dramatic rise in terrorist incidents year on year from 2003 (when it appears published records begin - although again, there are numerous sources saying that the NCC is actually suppressing far worse figures that show global terrorist incidents numbering just a few hundred per year before the latest 'war on terror' was launched). See http://wits.nctc.gov/Main.do for more information. Either download and read the annual reports or perform the search yourself. To summarise: 2004 = 3264 incidents; 2005 = 11152 incidents; 2006 = 14480 incidents. There are other ways of measuring the increased occurrence and threat of terrorism. You can look at the national threat levels of various countries year-on-year and you can look at major terrorist incidents (involving 100+ casualties). Again, in both cases, the numbers go up, not down. I hope this is more than enough to convince you (or rather, Wikipedia) that a 'war on terror' which sees more, not less, terror can be safely classified as 'counter-productive'. I shall add the NCC's findings to the page in question. Many thanks for your help in improving this page and its citations. Andrew —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.6.104.229 (talk • contribs)

[edit] POTD notification

POTD
POTD

Mr Cheese,

Just to let you know that the Featured Picture Image:4-14 Marines in Fallujah.jpg is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on August 4, 2007. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2007-08-04. howcheng {chat} 23:57, 23 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Lifehouse1.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Lifehouse1.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Ejfetters 17:01, 24 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] July 2007 WP:FILMS Newsletter

The July 2007 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This is an automated delivery by BrownBot 18:49, 31 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Being an admin

Thankyou for the honour. Yes I still want to be an admin and you can nominate me. As I say on my user page, I do mostly minor edits but when I contribute to discussions I try to add something worth saying. Like this deletion nomination or this edit to the village pump. I copyedit the Wikipedia Signpost and lurk on the noticeboards so I tend to remember things like that. I have also been offered a nomination by User:TheCoffee but turned that down because of school. I don't have school anymore I am still studying a part-time course so I have time to do admin-related duties. I have a mobility lesson (learning how to use the white cane) in about an hour from now and I have the part-time course all day tomorrow Therefore if I don't have answers ready by tonight my time, wait till tomorrow night or Saturday morning to nominate me - I want to be there when the nomination is placed on the page. But yes, go ahead with it! Graham87 06:18, 2 August 2007 (UTC)

Actually I won't be able to attend to the adminship discussion until Saturday at the earliest. Graham87 09:37, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
Cool, thanks. I've fixed some grammar and changed one of your examples from wikipedia:unusual articles to wikipedia:village pump (technical) as the latter is more strongly related to admin duties; I have tried to make substantial and thoughtful responses there and I'm much more proud of my work there than at unusual articles, in which I've done just minor edits. I would also like you to mention at some point that I use a screen reader - in your own words of course. It is a part of who I am here and I'm going to talk about that more as one of my planned answers to the questions. Graham87 00:39, 7 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] My admin nom

OK, I've answered the questions and put my nom on the RFA page. Thanks again for the nomination! Graham87 06:38, 7 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Gateway1.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Gateway1.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. TheIslander 16:46, 9 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Cerritos category

Hey Jumping cheese, I was just wondering if you wanted to add the Cerritos category, to your profile. I think it'd be cool to get more people who have an affliation with Cerritos to add it on and help increase awareness and help populate the list a bit more. President Rhapsody 21:49, 15 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Replaceable fair use Image:Christian_Finnegan.jpg

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:Christian_Finnegan.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
  2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 7 days after this notification, per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Videmus Omnia Talk 14:35, 16 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Source of Image:ACT.gif

Hey, I was looking over Image:ACT.gif, and noticed it needed a fair use rationale. It seems to easily fall within the boundaries, but there's no source.You're the original uploader. Do you remember where you got it? --YbborTalk 21:42, 23 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Unspecified source for Image:Christian_Finnegan.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Christian_Finnegan.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 22:26, 23 August 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Videmus Omnia Talk 22:26, 23 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Replaceable fair use Image:Christian_Finnegan.jpg

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:Christian_Finnegan.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
  2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 7 days after this notification, per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Videmus Omnia Talk 22:27, 23 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Christian Finnegan

Hey, just to let you know - looks like I found a Flickr user willing to donate a pic of him under free license. I'm kind of backlogged on uploading pictures (I had a lot of successful requests) but I'll try to get it done this weekend. Thanks for the note! Videmus Omnia Talk 23:19, 23 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] August 2007 WP:FILMS Newsletter

The August 2007 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This is an automated delivery by BrownBot 04:08, 1 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] WikiProject Films roll call

Hey fellow Wikipedian! Your username is listed on the WikiProject Films participants list, but we are unsure as to which editors are still active on the project. If you still consider yourself an active WP:FILM editor, please add your name to the Active Members list. You may also wish to add {{User WikiProject Films}} to your userpage, if you haven't done so already. We also have several task forces that you may be interested in joining as well.


Also, elections for Project Coordinators are currently in sign-up phase. If you would be interested in running, or would like to ask questions of the candidates, please take a look. You can see more information on the positions at Wikipedia:WikiProject Films/Coordinators. Thanks and happy editing!

An automatic notification by BrownBot 23:39, 15 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Taser incident

I'd love it if you left what Bada removed, the huge stretch of hearsay, out of the article. So please stop reverting his edits. Cheers! [Tyler] (talk/contribs) 04:31, 19 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] What is the best way to deal with this?

I stopped actively editing for the time being (junior year and all :P), but I noticed this. It is made by an anonymous IP (with no prior edits) and it removes a "Karl" post that you responded to. However, the removal makes it seems that your response was directed at the post before "Karl's", one of my posts. It presents quite a dilemma for me. How can I indicate that your response was not originally directed at me but at a deleted post? Or is it better to revert?

PS: How are you doing? Typer525 Talk 05:55, 26 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Good News!

This is something your going to love; it perfectly captures the nature of the sayings "he who hesitates is lost" and "what goes around comes around" :) TomStar81 (Talk) 08:55, 30 September 2007 (UTC)

You wanna come to my house to play pool? —Uncle Dee 20:23, 1 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] WikiProject Films September 2007 Newsletter

The September 2007 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

Please note that special delivery options have been reset and ignored for this issue due to the revamp of the membership list (outlined in further detail in the newsletter). If you would like to change your delivery settings for future issues, please follow the above link. I apologize for the inconvenience. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot 23:18, 1 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Replaceable fair use Image:American Hi-Fi.jpg

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:American Hi-Fi.jpg. I noticed the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
  2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if not used in an article), per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 07:05, 6 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] WikiProject Films October 2007 Newsletter

The October 2007 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot 21:08, 31 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Orphaned non-free media (Image:Cozaar.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:Cozaar.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 18:41, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:MSN_Hotmail.gif

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:MSN_Hotmail.gif. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Jusjih 03:51, 8 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Replaceable fair use Image:Rich_Lowry.jpg

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:Rich_Lowry.jpg. I noticed the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
  2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if not used in an article), per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Videmus Omnia Talk 04:40, 11 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Orphaned non-free media (Image:Aviarious.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Aviarious.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 02:13, 12 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Orphaned non-free media (Image:Rich Lowry.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Rich Lowry.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 02:31, 12 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Gateway1.jpg replaced by Image:Gw2k 2004 logo.svg

Hi! Fair-use image Image:Gateway1.jpg (which you uploaded) has now been replaced by Image:Gw2k 2004 logo.svg, and the old version will be deleted in 7 days unless it is needed in another article. Thank you for your contribution. --Closeapple (talk) 01:13, 24 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Speedy deletion of Image:WhitneyHSSeal1.gif

A tag has been placed on Image:WhitneyHSSeal1.gif requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I6 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a non-free image with no fair use rationale uploaded after May 4, 2006 which has been tagged as not having a rationale for more than 7 days.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Zedla (talk) 07:33, 25 November 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Wade's Residence.png

Thanks for uploading Image:Wade's Residence.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 05:42, 30 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Orphaned non-free media (Image:In the Red.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:In the Red.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 20:16, 30 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] WikiProject Films November 2007 Newsletter

The November 2007 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot 02:11, 1 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Replaceable fair use Image:John Leo.jpg

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:John Leo.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
  2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, fair use media which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if not used in an article), per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. High on a tree (talk) 01:23, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] AfD nomination of Wade Load

An editor has nominated Wade Load, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wade Load and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 04:30, 1 January 2008 (UTC)


[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:CCF.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:CCF.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 06:58, 1 January 2008 (UTC)


[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Failure to Launch.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Failure to Launch.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 05:40, 2 January 2008 (UTC)


[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Mike's New Car.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Mike's New Car.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 14:25, 2 January 2008 (UTC)


[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Mad Real World.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Mad Real World.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 14:34, 2 January 2008 (UTC)


[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Justina Headley Book.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Justina Headley Book.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 16:50, 2 January 2008 (UTC)


[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Killigan.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Killigan.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 17:36, 2 January 2008 (UTC)


[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Kim Possible 1.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Kim Possible 1.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 17:53, 2 January 2008 (UTC)


[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Kim Possible 2.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Kim Possible 2.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 17:54, 2 January 2008 (UTC)


[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Kim Possible 3 Team Possible.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Kim Possible 3 Team Possible.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 17:54, 2 January 2008 (UTC)


[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Kim Possible 3.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Kim Possible 3.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 17:55, 2 January 2008 (UTC)


[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Kim Possible Vivian.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Kim Possible Vivian.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 17:56, 2 January 2008 (UTC)