User talk:Juliancolton/Archive 2

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This page is an archive. Please do not edit the contents of this page. Direct any additional comments to the current talk page.

Thanks

Hi. Thanks for the newsletter. Wow, we have 2 FA's already! Anyway, I noticed a few things: is "Graspe" (place in Canada) supposed to be Gaspé, on the one I recieved there is a red template link but this {{non-tropical}} seems to be fine. Thanks. ~AH1^(TCU) 00:43, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Hi. Ok, oh and by the way, where I live and in other parts of Southern Ontario there have been a foot of snow in many places. Snowbanks 5 ft high, and I spent an hour clearing the snowbank off the car. Great job on the project, and I have to go for now. Thanks. ~AH1^(TCU) 01:00, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Hurricane Darby (1992)

On 21 February 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Hurricane Darby (1992), which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--Elkman ^(Elkspeak) 21:55, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

New mailing list

There has been a mailing list created for Wikipedians in the New York metropolitan area (list: Wikimedia NYC). Please consider joining it! Cbrown1023 talk 21:15, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

New edition of newsletter

I have started the new edition of the WP:SEVERE newsletter at Wikipedia:WikiProject Severe weather/Newsletter/March 2008. I would like you to look at my nomination for featured story, I will make a featured member nomination later on. I will also help you with WP:NTROP newsletter. You might want to be sure to make the newsletter into an actual template as the table you created includes anything posted below it on talk pages. Thanks, Southern Illinois SKYWARN (talk) 17:05, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

It's at the original newsletter page. By the way, I will nominate User:JForget for featured member, I gave him a barnstar for his work. Southern Illinois SKYWARN (talk) 17:56, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

well done

On 23 February 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Hurricane Hernan (2002), which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--Victuallers (talk) 21:46, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

GA review of Castle Lake (California)

Thanks for the thoughtful comments in your review of Castle Lake (California) (and thanks for fixing the name back to parentheses). I'm traveling this weekend, so it may be another day or two before I work on the substance of the article. Thanks again! NorCalHistory (talk) 01:56, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

I believe (hope!) that I have responded to your notes on the Article Talk page. Sincere thanks for working on the endless task of trying to work down the GAN backlog. NorCalHistory (talk) 17:07, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

All comments cheerfully accepted! NorCalHistory (talk) 17:10, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

I'll be glad to take on your most recent round of suggestions - when I'm done, it would be great if you would like to give it a final scrubdown! NorCalHistory (talk) 17:15, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

I think I got all your points. Anything else? If you want to do some additional ce yourself, that would be appreciated! NorCalHistory (talk) 17:37, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for your tweaks - I will give it one last look, and let you know within the hour! NorCalHistory (talk) 18:09, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

Although I could tinker with this article endlessly, I've made a few last (minor) ce tweaks, and I think I better just submit it now for your final judgment . . . I've very much enjoyed working with you, it was a real pleasure! NorCalHistory (talk) 19:48, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

Tropical Storm Fay (2002)

Under the impacts section, it states "In total, 4260 houses sustained damage from flooding", but your source only says 400 houses were damaged. Am I missing something here? ---CWY2190^TC 03:34, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

Rte 376

I got your note. Why don't we discuss it on the NY 376 talk page? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Triskele Jim (talk • contribs) 14:57, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

Tropical cyclone

Many edits were made to improve inline sourcing, per another reviewer, which led to some changes to the text of the article. If you could take another look at the article, it would be appreciated. I'm finding it disconcerting that oppose votes remain despite changes being made to fulfill the opposers requests. I'd really like the article to get to FA on its third attempt. Thegreatdr (talk) 05:47, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

Domestic sheep reproduction

Thanks a million for the review! Happy editing, VanTucky 22:11, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

Signpost updated for February 18th and 25th, 2008.

Weekly Delivery

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 08:28, 27 February 2008 (UTC)

Hurricane Flossy

I think I fulfilled the GA suggestions you made for Flossy. If not, let me know. Thegreatdr (talk) 04:28, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

John Cooke (Royal Navy officer)

Thankyou very much for your review (and I was was just sitting down and thinking "I'd better run through that article again, I wasn't happy with all the prose", so I'll get on that). Regards--Jackyd101 (talk) 18:37, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

GA review for "Episode 210"

Thanks for comments so far but I was wondering if you could elaborate a little on the comments you made about POV issues please. I realise that there is probably some in the sections mentioning the writers strike but there isn't many, if any, references regarding specific shows from the view of the AMPTP (the opposing side to the writers). -- Jamie jca (talk) 22:03, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

• • I've addressed the comments you made on the pages talk page and i've also read the the page a few times and I believe i've sorted out POV issues. I've also expanded the lead from what it was at the time of the original GA review. Is there anything else which needs doing? If not, I believe i've fulfilled the criteria -- Jamie jca (talk) 22:41, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

• • • Is there anything else which it needs? -- Jamie jca (talk) 20:53, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

GA review for "Pilot (The Office episode)"

Hey. I've addressed the concerns you had, and commented on your requests. My notes are at the talk page. Have a good day. Mastrchf91 (^t/_c) 22:25, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

Ga Review for Bob Windle

Replied. Thanks, Blnguyen (vote in the photo straw poll) 08:17, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

Hi there. I'll get the image scanned for you next week since I'm waiting for the book I used to come back to the library if that's how much of a necessity the image is, but generally squeezing out a FU for the sake of an image is not considered necessary, eg, talk to Nishkid64. Thanks, Blnguyen (vote in the photo straw poll) 05:43, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

Ping? Blnguyen (vote in the photo straw poll) 08:53, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

Australia related articles

Hello, Juliancolton. Recently you reviewed the articles, Who Killed Dr Bogle and Mrs Chandler?, Jai Koutrae, Doing Time for Patsy Cline and Rock Chikz and you gave them a fail for their good article nomination. Since you gave them a fail could you please tell me how I could improve them to reach their correct standard for good article? Or if possible could you make the edits yourself? Thank you EmmaButton (talk) 21:20, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

Canada's Walk of Fame

Hi, I believe I have addressed the concerns of your GA review. Thanks, Scorpion⁰⁴²² 02:05, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

Navajo rug

Hi, I've taken care of that one missing citation. Thank you for reviewing. Regards, Durova^Charge! 03:58, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

Hi, before the clock runs out could you give this a second look? Thanks, Durova^Charge! 23:22, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

Tropical cyclones WikiProject Newsletter #14

The February issue of the WikiProject Tropical cyclones newsletter is now available; the first issue came out a few minutes before midnight, worry not. If you wish to receive the full newsletter or no longer be informed of the release of future editions, please add your username to the appropriate section on the mailing list. ♬♩ Hurricanehink (talk) 05:13, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Severe Weather Newsletter (March 2008)

The WikiProject Severe weather Newsletter Issue 2, March 2008 If you would like to delete this message, the original is at Wikipedia:WikiProject Severe weather/Newsletter/March 2008

Welcome Welcome to the second edition of the WikiProject Severe weather newsletter. In this edition of the newsletter we will detail the upcoming severe weather season, touch on last month's tornado outbreaks, and look at a new proposal for formatting tornado outbreak articles. New project articles Arkansas-Mississippi-Alabama tornado outbreak-A late-season outbreak in 2001 List of May 2004 tornado outbreak sequence tornadoes-Split from the main article Benton, Arkansas Tornado Outbreak-Recreated a needed deleted page 2008 Super Tuesday tornado outbreak (accompanied by a separate list)- Details the massive outbrek of last month, see below A myriad of new articles were added late in the month by User:JForget about older, lesser known tornado outbreaks. May 1968 tornado outbreak Dallas tornado outbreak of April 1957 Wheelersburg, Ohio tornado outbreak Arkansas-Tennessee tornado outbreak of 1952 Mississippi Valley tornado outbreak of February 1971 Saragosa, Texas tornado 2003 South Dakota tornado outbreak-Added by User:Stormtracker94 Featured story This month's featured story has two parts, the first part detailing the upcoming severe weather season, and the second part will detail a new proposal for tornado outbreak articles. With numerous outbreaks already, this season may very well be one of the worst ever. First, a review of past seasons. Last year's severe weather was mainly focused on the western High Plains, with no classic Oklahoma tornado outbreaks. Most of the outbreaks last season had supercells forming along either a cold front or dry line in western Kansas and the panhandles of Oklahoma and Texas. Most of these storms moved due north or northeast, producing flooding problems. The severe weather season was especially boring farther east in the Midwest where only an occasional squall line moved through. I personally missed the Greensburg tornado because I went to Saint Louis on May 5 to watch a baseball game. I can still remember seeing the high risk in Kansas on the monitor in the rest stop. 2006 was a little bit more active and widespread. As always, the NWS and SPC did an amazing job of forecasting the storms. Back to the future (ha!) the CPC outlooks are saying warmer and drier than normal in tornado alley. However, it looks to be a bit more exciting severe weather season for people farther east in the Midwest (including me) with warmer than normal temperatures and equal chances of being above and below forecast values, which usually means normal amounts. As local TV stations have pointed out, we should all be prepared. I know we have all heard it, but it still needs to be repeated. Two words: Weather Radio Everyone should have a tone-alerted weather radio, SAME if you perfer to not be woken up for a flash flood watch 50 miles from you. Weather radios will also go off if your local emergency management agency requests a statement be issued by the National Weather Service for things such as evacuations. (Note: Even though there was a gas leak in my town with evacuations, a prodcut was not issued by the National Weather Service, even when they are issued to request people to stay off roads.) If you are under a tornado warning or a high end severe thunderstorm warning (i.e.: 70 m.p.h. winds +) go to an interior room on the lowest floor of your building, perferably a basement. Stay away from windows and any other hazardous objects. I may not have included it all, so obey the safety rules in warnings from the National Weather Service. Spotters should call the NWS immediately upon observing severe weather. If the event was borderline severe, use E-Spotter (If your office uses it). Remember the #1 thing: Stay Safe this season anywhere you are, from chasing in Oklahoma to watching it unfold on TV in Ohio. New Standards With the upcoming severe weather season, User:Southern Illinois SKYWARN has proposed new standards for tornado outbreak articles. Overview States the number of tornadoes, fatalities. Briefly describes any strange events and records set. (Required) Meteorological sypnosis Describes weather leading up to the outbreak and SPC products issued.(Required) Confirmed tornadoes Tornado table, no text besides that in the table (Required, should be split into list if very large) Significant storms (Variable name) Describes the most significant storms and tornadoes (Required) Aftermath Descibes aftermath in detail, should also include disaster declerations (Required) Non-thunderstorm effects/Non-tornadic effects Use the first if snow or other non-thunderstorm events occured (Optional) The latter should be standard on all pages describing effects from a squall line, hail, flash flooding, or other non-tornadic effects (Required) Oddities/Records Only used if nessecary (Optional) References (Required) See also Should always link to at least List of North American tornadoes and tornado outbreaks (Required) External links External links should only go to news stories or NWS pages (Required) These standards have been developed for tornado outbreaks where a alot of information is available. Older outbreaks should include as much information as possible. Readers are encouraged to express their opinion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Severe weather/Tornado. Wikiwork statistics Severe weather articles Importance Top High Mid Low None Total Quality FA 1 1 2 GA 2 7 3 12 B 4 8 16 14 42 Start 6 19 70 64 159 Stub 1 6 21 58 1 87 List 1 11 20 1 33 Assessed 12 36 126 159 2 335 Unassessed 2 2 Total 12 36 126 159 4 337 Members section New members User:Stormtracker94 (talk) has joined the project after a suggestion from a current member User:Rdfox 76 (talk) also joined after a suggestion Featured member This month's featured member is User:JForget The following text is from User:Southern Illinois SKYWARN's nomination This user has started numerous articles on older, significant tornado outbreaks that met notability requirements. JForget recently received a barnstar (even if it was from me) for his work in WikiProject Severe Weather. JForget is one of the most tireless contributors to the project and deserves to be this month's featured member. Note: Readers of this newsletter are urged to check the newsletter page for nominations for featured member and featured story. Significant storms Main article: 2008 Super Tuesday tornado outbreak The first February high risk since 1998 Obviously the first order of business for this section is the massive, devestating tornado outbreak on February 5, or Super Tuesday. 82 tornadoes and 59 fatalities were confirmed in association with this outbreak. This was the deadliest outbreak since the United States-Canadian Outbreak in 1985 which killed 88. Tornado watches, many of them Particularly dangerous situation watches at one point extended from the Ohio Valley to the Gulf Coast. Instability and shear values were extreme, especially for February. This was a very well forecasted and warned event, despite media reports of people receiving no warning. I am sorry, but I am going to rant a little about this. The National Weather Service field offices and the Storm Prediction Center did an amazing job of warning of this event despite the speed of the storms. Many National Weather Service offices held at least one conference call with emergency managers, media, spotter groups, and other interested parties. I am outraged that the media reported this as if the forecasters were asleep at the wheel, while this really was one of the best forecasted events ever. Now while we will have to wait for the likely service assessment to come out, I believe that all numbers from the false-alarm rate to the probability of detection were above national averages. Now that I am done with my little editorial, I will get back to the outbreak. A high risk was issued by the Storm Prediction Center on the morning of February 5 for most of Arkansas, the first such issuance in February since 1998. Later in the morning, it was further was extened to include western Kentucky, northwestern Mississippi, the Missouri Bootheel, West Tennessee, and Far Southern Illinois (Close to where I live, Yikes!). A moderate risk surrounded this area, where the squall line was the main problem. A massive squal line developed in the Great Plains prompting only a few warnings at first, but when it came into the area where the cap had broken and unfortunately supercells went through, it exploded producing strong winds, hail, and a few tornadoes. Now for the supercells. Supercells began to develop late in the day in Arkansas and Missouri after the cap broke mcuh later than expected. These supercells began to move north and east and then became tornadic. A record five tornado emergencies were issued in association with this outbreak. One supercell developed to the southwest of Memphis and devestated eastern and southern suburbs. Other notable supercells had tracks of over 200 miles and produced several tornadoes. For more information about its non-tornadic effects see the article and the upcoming WikiProject Non-Tropical storms newsletter. Other outbreaks struck in the middle of the month throughout the south, especially along the Gulf Coast. Only one death has been confirmed in association with any of these outbreaks, however extensive property damage occured.

Southern Illinois SKYWARN (talk) 16:51, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

Newsletters

Thanks for the compliment. I will start working on the WP:NTROP newsletter anytime. One thing about the NTROP newsletter, be sure to make it into a template rather than changing the whole thing to table, I had to delete the newsletter from my talk page as it included any messages posted below it. I personally like the format of WP:SEVERE newsletter at the start of the month, and the NTROP newsletter in the middle. We could flip the order every once and a while to put both projects on equal standing. Any thoughts? Southern Illinois SKYWARN (talk) 03:46, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Good Articles Newsletter

The March 2008 issue of the WikiProject Good Articles Newsletter is ready! Dr. Cash (talk) 06:02, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

The Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles Newsletter

The WikiProject Good Articles Newsletter Volume I, No. 5 - March 2008 February issue | April issue Project News There are currently 3,647 Good Articles listed at WP:GA. The backlog at Good Article Nominations is 185 unreviewed articles. Out of 237 total nominations, 42 are on hold, and 10 are under review. Please go to WP:GAN and review an article or three as soon as you have a chance! The oldest unreviewed articles are: Ian Browne (cyclist), Tony Marchant, Reginald fitz Jocelin, Annie Russell, Brodie Croyle, and Jimmy Moore. The top five categories with the largest backlogs are: Sports and recreation (39 articles), Theatre, film, and drama (34 articles), Transport (23 articles), Music (21 articles), Politics and government (18 articles), Culture and society (13 articles), Places (13 articles), and World history (12 articles). The backlog at Good Article Reassessment currently stands at 13 articles up for re-review. If every participant of WikiProject Good Articles could review just one article in the next week, the backlog would be almost eliminated! GA Sweeps Update Two members joined the sweeps team this month. They are Jwanders and jackyd101. Jwanders swept Physics sub-category quickly and is now sweeping "Astronomy and astrophysics". Meanwhile, jackyd101 is sweeping "Armies, military units and legal issues". During February, 66 Good Articles were reviewed. Including those articles that were under GAR or on hold, 33 were kept as GA, 21 delisted, 17 currently on hold or at GAR, and 1 was exempted as they are now Featured Articles. Reviewer of the Month Blnguyen is the GAN Reviewer of the Month for February, based on the assessments made by Epbr123 on the number and thoroughness of the reviews made by individual reviewers each week. Blnguyen is from South Australia and has been editing Wikipedia since 2005. He was also the reviewer for the month of December 2007, so this marks the second time that he has been GAN's Top Reviewer for the Month. Congratulations to our GAN Reviewer of the Month for February! Other outstanding reviewers recognized during the month of January include: Blnguyen (talk · contribs) David Fuchs (talk · contribs) Derek.cashman (talk · contribs) Dihydrogen Monoxide (talk · contribs) Calbear22 (talk · contribs) Ealdgyth (talk · contribs) Jackturner3 (talk · contribs) TimVickers (talk · contribs) VanTucky (talk · contribs) Wrad (talk · contribs) Member News There are now 185 members of WikiProject Good Articles! Welcome to the 9 new members that joined during the month of February: Bibliomaniac15 (talk · contribs) Canyouhearmenow (talk · contribs) Chrisisinchrist (talk · contribs) Ed! (talk · contribs) Juliancolton (talk · contribs) Kakofonous (talk · contribs) LOTRrules (talk · contribs) Matthewedwards (talk · contribs) Nousernamesleft (talk · contribs) Did You Know... ...that the shortest timespan for a GA to be listed and subsequently delisted is 8 minutes? (The article is Project Chanology and currently listed on WP:GAR) ...that the current nominations system started on March 10, 2006? ...that in May 2006, number of GA surpassed number of FA? This WikiProject, and the Good Article program as a whole, would not be where it is today without each and every one of its members! Thank you to all! One GA Requirement - The Lead Section By Geometry guy In this issue, we will focus on one of the requirements for good articles: a good article article should follow Wikipedia's guideline on lead sections. So what does this guideline say, why does it say what it does, and how can good article reviewers help? The lead section is particularly important, because for many readers, it is the only part of the article which they will read. For instance, they may have come to the article by following a wikilink in another article simply to obtain a quick overview before they continue reading the original article. They may only read the first paragraph, or even the first sentence. On the other hand, one of the joys of Wikipedia is the way that embodies the endlessly branching tree of knowledge; if a lead is well written, it may encourage even such a reader to read on and learn something new. This is reflected in the terminology: "lead" is a word taken from journalism, where it recognized that many readers will only read the beginning of a newspaper article, and so it is important to convey the key points first, before going into detail. Note that "lead", in this sense, is pronounced as in "leading question" and is sometimes spelled as "lede" by journalists to distinguish it from lead, the metal, which was once very important in typesetting. Wikipedia supports both spellings. Wikipedia:Lead section is written with all this in mind, and describes two different roles for the lead: first, it should introduce the topic; second it should summarize the article. This is not always as easy as it seems; indeed, it is almost impossible to write a good lead if the article itself does not cover the topic well. It has a side benefit that an article which satisfies this guideline is probably also broad: if the lead is both a good introduction and a summary, then the article probably covers the main points. The good article process is often the first place in which an article is judged against this criterion, yet many current good articles may not meet it. A common fault is that the lead is purely an introduction, while the rest of the article contains other information, which should be summarized in the lead, but isn't. So, how can reviewers help to improve this? One approach is to read the rest of the article, and not the lead, first. Make a note of the significant points discussed in the article. There is usually at least one important issue in each section. Then, go back to the lead and ask the following questions: Does the first sentence of the lead define the topic, as described in the article? Is the most important information mentioned in the first paragraph? Is the lead a suitable length for the article? The lead guideline recommends 2–4 paragraphs depending on the article length, but judgment is more important than counting. Are each of the significant topics that you noted mentioned in the lead? If the answer to each of these questions is "yes", then the article probably meets the guideline. If not, you may be able to fix it yourself by summarizing the article. If you can't, then it suggests that there are not only problems with the lead, but also the rest of the article. That is the beauty of Wikipedia:Lead section. Finally, there isn't universal agreement on whether the lead should contain inline citations. As long as the material in the lead is developed and cited elsewhere in the article, then inline citation is not required. There are exceptions, the most significant being quotations and controversial material about living persons. Good luck helping more articles meet this important criterion! From the Editors Well, this is somewhat GA-related but at the same time not totally GA-related. However, I think this is important. Thanks to everyone who supported me at my 2nd RfA. It passed unanimously at 79 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral. As many are impressed by my work in Good Articles processes, I want to take this opportunity to thank everyone giving me a very enjoyable time at GA. There are 2 people that I want to explicitly say thank you to. They are Nehrams2020 and Epbr123. They patiently taught me how to do GA reviews properly in summer 2007. I couldn't achieve better without them. Now that I have the mop and the bucket, some of my time will be working on reducing Commons image backlog. Nevertheless, you will still see me once in a while in matters related to GA. OhanaUnited Please leave any comments or feedback regarding this issue here. Dr. Cash Contributors to this Issue Dr. Cash (Lead Editor, Distributor) OhanaUnited (GA Sweeps and Did You Know correspondent) Geometry guy (News Correspondent) Improving Wikipedia one article at a time since 2005! WikiProject Good Articles: Open Tasks This project identifies, organizes and improves good articles on Wikipedia. Nominations: Backlash (2007) • Fort Jackson (Virginia) • The Great American Bash (2007) • Jenny (Doctor Who) • New York State Route 9L Reassessment: Madonna (entertainer) • Sweeps / List: references (All Categories), image tags (All Categories), article quality (All Categories) Possible GAs Needing References: Clarinet • Carleton University • Appalachian Mountains Task forces: Project quality • Unreferenced GA Good article criteria | Statistics | GAN Report | Changes log Nominations queue: 211 articles (47 of them are on hold) as of 08:00, 13 June 2008 | edit

RE: Barnstar

Thanks so much! Well done for showing some enthusiasm in vandal-fighting! _{WEBURIEDOURSECRETSINTHEGARDEN} ^{aka john lennon} 22:28, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for keeping the vandalism of 64.107.133.124 at bay. They also violated the 3RR in the process, so they're off for 24 hours. Enjoy the peace and quiet. SchuminWeb (Talk) 00:59, 4 March 2008 (UTC)

You are invited!

New York City Meetup Next: Sunday March 16th, Columbia University area Last: 1/13/2008 This box: view • talk • edit

In the afternoon, we will hold a session dedicated to meta:Wikimedia New York City activities, and have salon-style group discussions on Wikipedia and the other Wikimedia projects (see the last meeting's minutes).

Well also make preparations for our exciting Wikipedia Takes Manhattan event, a free content photography contest for Columbia University students planned for Friday March 28 (about 2 weeks after our meeting).

In the evening, we'll share dinner and chat at a local restaurant, and (weather permitting) hold a late-night astronomy event at Columbia's telescopes.

You can add or remove your name from the New York City Meetups invite list at Wikipedia:Meetup/NYC/Invite list.

You're also invited to subscribe to the public Wikimedia New York City mailing list, which is a great way to receive timely updates.
This has been an automated delivery because you were on the invite list. BrownBot (talk) 03:05, 4 March 2008 (UTC)

List of New York hurricanes

I enjoyed working on Hernan, and I'd be glad to take a look at the NY hurricane list. Finetooth (talk) 03:58, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

Signpost updated for March 3rd, 2008.

Weekly Delivery

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 07:56, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

Suggested coachee

Hello Julian. MBisanz suggested that I should be your admin coach. I looked over your contributions and I'm quite impressed by your work. I think I can "prepare" you for adminship. For curiosity's sake, I can tell you that I have had three coachees, two of whom are currently admins (Heimstern and Mallanox). The other one (Exir Kamalabadi) has been inactive due to the blocking of Wikipedia in mainland China. If you accept, I'll gladly take you under my wing. Nishkid64 (talk) 16:40, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

You can start by creating a subpage in your userspace. Introduce yourself and explain what you intend to get out of this admin coaching. Give me a few days to start working with you. I have exams and an essay to write. :( Nishkid64 (talk) 02:55, 6 March 2008 (UTC)

Automated edits

Thank you for correcting me and please pardon my calling your many edits "automated" in your ER. It just makes all those tedious yet necessary edits of yours all the more impressive! κaτaʟaveno^T_C 00:38, 6 March 2008 (UTC)

Grand central station FPC

Hey, I just wanted to let you know that I uploaded an edit that attempts to address the issues you raised with the photograph. It was a bit of a struggle to correct the distortion at all. I guess I feel like it would be hard for a better picture to be taken given where the building is. Anyway, a second look would be appreciated. Thanks -Fcb981(talk:contribs) 07:31, 6 March 2008 (UTC)

		The Reviewers Award
		To Juliancolton, for high quality article reviewing at FAC Casliber (talk · contribs) 10:38, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

User:Juliancolton/List of retired Australian cyclone names

You probably already know this, but there are three different RSMC's in the Australian region. Perhaps it might be good to divide the names in User:Juliancolton/List of retired Australian cyclone names apart by city; that is, have one section for Darwin retired names, one ofr Brisbane, and one for Perth. Alternatively, three seperate lists could be created (excessive IMO) or having a fourth section titled "By RSMC" or the like. Miss Madeline | Talk to Madeline 05:53, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

Not to be rude...

Well, I did put a source on that page, except I had no idea how to complete the reference site, even though i apparently used the correct syntax. So I thought another user or a Bot would complete it for me, because I remember when I didn't know how to put somethig in the right place, the next day it was in the right place. But that's a different story. I knew that it was more then 2 million dollars, because that was an early report from Vermont. Please excuse me because I am 11 and half the time don't know what i am doing. Am i wrong to even be doing this anyway? Anyways,

A bit confused--RayquazaDialgaWeird2210 (talk) 17:14, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

Homeschooling Newsletter

	The Homeschooling WikiProject News
Issue One • Early March 2008 • About the Newsletter
News Recent Project News A New WikiProject Homeschooling member, Basketball110 has been hired by Diligent Terrier (Project Founder and Newsletter Writer) as the official newsletter deliverer. When you get a chance, stop by his talk page and thank him for joining and volunteering at the project! This newsletter is part of the Newsroom project, which has been created to update our members on the latest news at the project and on homeschooling. Project member count reaches 18 19 20 21 :) members! Keep inviting all your WikiFriends using our invitation templates. Remember to thank users Burner0718 and RC-0722 for helping to recruit users for this WikiProject. Wikipedia user Sherurcij, currently not a member, has asked for support from our members at other Wikimedia projects such as WikiSource and Wikimedia Commons. This message can be found at the project's talk page. Remember: The project is now accessible from new shortcuts, WP:HOME and WP:WPHS. Birthdays: Wish RC-0722 a happy (late) birthday. Collaboration of the Month Nominations are currently open for WikiProject Homeschooling's Collaboration of the month. You can nominate and vote here. A Wikipedia Ad for the project will be created by User:Miranda. This user would like to know exactly what the ad should say. Suggestions should be left at Diligent Terrier's talk page. Recent Homeschooling News Homeschooling has been banned in California by recent court ruling on March 6, 2008. As homeschool families protest, California Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger has asked for the ruling to be overturned.
Archives • Newsroom
Newsletter written by DiligentTerrier and friends. Newsletter delivered by Basketball110

Admin coaching

PING. I've commented on your admin coaching page. :) Nishkid64 _{(Make articles, not love)} 23:14, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

Re: 1988 PHS FAC Comment

I believe I have addressed your comments at the FAC by adding the name of the author to the references where the author is given. Hello32020 (talk) 01:40, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

You're too quick. ;) Hello32020 (talk) 01:41, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

Do you need to talk...

I noticed you had your wikirage meter set on enraged. Do you need to talk? Feel free just to shoot me off an e-mail, I have it enabled. Southern Illinois SKYWARN (talk) 02:41, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

You do a lot of good things for Wikipedia, even if some of them go unrecgoinzed, and if a few people are being a little rude, just ignore it. By the way, just go into preferences and put in your e-mail address. Check your junk folder for an activation e-mail from Wikimedia. Southern Illinois SKYWARN (talk) 03:01, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

When I saw that ArbCom case, I was tempted to leave USRD, but I'm to much of a roadgeek to do it. Anyway, we could start working on the newsletter right now since I have done some reorganzation and centralized everything. Also note that I nominated all of the newsletter subpages for speedy deletion since it is on the main newsletter page. Southern Illinois SKYWARN (talk) 16:51, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

That's my area all right, although all the snow where I live melted from solar radiation. I'll work on the other parts too. Southern Illinois SKYWARN (talk) 16:55, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

The blizzard will be in next month's newsletter. It may sound weird, but the March newsletter should talk about February storms. Southern Illinois SKYWARN (talk) 17:01, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

NY 311 pic

I don't have one, actually, but when it gets warm and green and leafy again I'm thinking of getting over to Lake Carmel to take some pics for the 52 article. I could easily get some then.

BTW, I haven't forgotten about giving you an article to work on ... I've just been busy with so much else. I do have one in mind. Daniel Case (talk) 14:13, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

GAN on hold for Hurricane Hernan (2002)

It's me again. I've the GAN for Hurricane Hernan on hold for now. It just needs a few little tweaks. You need references in the lead section, (Almost everyone forgets those) and you need to mention its effects on shipping (If there were any). Great article overall! Southern Illinois SKYWARN (talk) 21:35, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

Passed, Great job! Southern Illinois SKYWARN (talk) 21:45, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

Congratulations

Congratulations on GA for Hernan. I've been watching its progress, and I'm pleased that it passed. Finetooth (talk) 23:23, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

NY hurricane list

I've done a bit of copyediting on List of New York hurricanes, and I see that help has come from elsewhere as well. I noticed that the article includes three GIFs, which are deprecated except for animations. I didn't change any of them, but Hurricane Bob has a good one that could be substituted for the top image, and the other two could be converted to JPG or PNG. I could help with this if you like. Just a suggestion. Finetooth (talk) 23:23, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

Thanks

I just kinda going through the same thing as you. I am in a little conflict with an admin, who practically believes in no rules on Wikipedia. This stirred up some feelings from an old conflict, with another admin. I was a mediator in this case. The admin almost went to ArbCom for other incivility, but alas all the other admins wanted to protect their buddy. Talking it out helped alot, thanks. Southern Illinois SKYWARN (talk) 00:09, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

I'd never win, and I think that might be a little extreme for now. Southern Illinois SKYWARN (talk) 00:13, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

No, no. I just decided to play Sim City 4 to help me relax, and I couldn't help popping back in every once in a while. Just leave me a message if you want to talk so I don't have be popping in and out of the channel.

I overreacted a little with my dispute over the weekend. The reason I went on a Wikibreak was that I was almost finished with a game, Phoenix Wright: Ace Attorney. I'll try to finish off the WP:NTROP newsletter this weekend. I thought the user was an admin because of all of his "contributions" to RFAs. Thanks again, Southern Illinois SKYWARN (talk) 18:17, 14 March 2008 (UTC)

Image file conversions

Paint.NET, available free here on the Internet, will do the conversions on computers running Windows. Ditto for Photoshop. The procedure is to download the existing image from Wikipedia or the Commons to your home computer, convert the image to the desired format, re-upload, and insert the new image in the desired place(s) in one or more articles. I can do that for you if you want me to, but you might prefer adding some new tools and techniques to your repertoire. Finetooth (talk) 00:52, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

Re: Tropical cyclones WikiProject

Ok. I joined. Does this project have a newsletter? - Milk's Favorite Cookie 01:40, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

I'm not sure if you saw the above question. - Milk's Favorite Cookie 19:37, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

Re: Infobox hurricane impact

I was waiting for when you'd get around to that. Alright, I had a couple of thoughts on it from the past. I think it should go like this.

• Name (on top)
• Category (based on peak SSHS winds in the area)
• Image
• Image caption
• Areas affected (this should be first, since it's the focus of the article)
• Date (either date of closest point of approach, or of landfall)
• Highest winds (within the area, in mph, then km/h 1-min sustained)
• Gusts (within the area, in mph, then km/h 1-min sustained)
• Rainfall maxima (perhaps make optional)
• Fatalities
• Damage
• Season

♬♩ Hurricanehink (talk) 15:39, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

List of basic meteorology topics

Please have a look, and add missing topics.

Thanks.

The Transhumanist    19:35, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Invitation

Thanks for your invitation the tropical storm projects but my contributions are not frequent enough to be really a member of the project, but I can help with some of the articles and perhaps I will decide just to become a member but I will sign it yet (maybe later, but I think I would have to increase contribs there to be really a member. Anyways, in addition of being an administrator, I'm a member of the Severe weather, non-tropical storms, Ottawa, Quebec and Canadian politics and political parties Wikiprojects not to mention I had major contributions to Canadian (or mostly Quebec) roads in the past. Thanks again.--JForget 23:48, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

I too will have to decline. I do love hurricanes and other weather-related phenomena, but my technical knowledge is pretty limited. By the way, I'll start with some AIV practices on your admin coaching page. In the meantime, could you just give me a little info about your experience with AIV thus far? Just post that on the coaching page. Thanks, Nishkid64 _{(Make articles, not love)} 02:13, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

Homeschooling Newsletter

	The Homeschooling WikiProject News
Issue Two • Late March 2008 • About the Newsletter
News Recent Project News WikiProject merger: Diligent Terrier has proposed that WikiProject Alternative Education be merged into this WikiProject. Although it is currently inactive, the merger may give the projects a chance to grow stronger. You can read the proposal at their talk page. Collaboration of the Month nominations are currently open for WikiProject Homeschooling's Collaboration of the month. It is mandatory, well not mandatory, but highly encouraged that you, as a member, nominate and/or vote for the Collaboration of the month. A Wikipedia Ad for the project has been created by User:Miranda. You can view it at Wikipedia:WikiProject Homeschooling/Ad. Please include the ad in your userpage to show your support for the project. The Userbox Discussion for the selection of our official and standard userbox has been reopened now that we have more members. The discussion was originally opened by Unschool last month, but was put on hold until our group had more users. Assistant Coordinators Diligent Terrier has nominated two users to be assistant coordinators, User:Burner0718 and User:RC-0722 Project member count has reached 21 members! Several users joined following the publication of the previous newsletter. Remember: The project is now accessible from new shortcuts, WP:HOME and WP:WPHS. Birthdays: Wish RC-0722 a happy (late) birthday. Wikisource collaboration has been proposed by Sherurcij, an administrator on Wikisource. He is seeking help putting the complete texts of Author:Charlotte Mason online. Recent Homeschooling News The "homeschooling convention season" (March - August) has started. . Sorry — couldn't think of a better story. Homeschooling has been banned in California by recent court ruling on March 6, 2008. As homeschool families protest, California Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger has asked for the ruling to be overturned.
Archives • Newsroom
Newsletter written by DiligentTerrier and friends. Newsletter delivered by Basketball110

Amanda (award)

Thanks for your review and pass of my Amanda (award) article! Lampman ^{Talk to me!} 14:51, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

Admin coaching

Sorry for the delayed response. I have now posted some practice AIV reports. Best, Nishkid64 _{(Make articles, not love)} 01:22, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

Article tagging

Whenever a subproject tag is added to a particular page (flood, hurricane, non-tropical), it has been the custom to remove the meteorology tag since the subproject tag also has a link to the meteorology project. It eliminates repetition. Thegreatdr (talk) 16:17, 14 March 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for the compliments!

I see you've been busy adding to the ranks of HV. Thanks ... I was going to make some of those changes myself.

I very much appreciate your compliments on the three NHL articles (Springside, Dutch Reformed Church and Delaware and Hudson Canal (that one was already tagged, though)). Yes, I do intend to take those to GA and maybe FA eventually ... Springside is probably closer; I'm just waiting to get a photo of the section of the house that's in the state museum. As for the DRC, I'm hoping to get in touch with Jim Hoekema and get a pic of the inside, then add a section on its current rehabilitation issues, update the infobox to {{infobox religious building}} and (ideally) get a pic from when Hillary Clinton visited (I was there that day covering it as a reporter, so this article means a lot to me). Daniel Case (talk) 18:44, 14 March 2008 (UTC)

Here's a photo of the Springside display on the fourth floor of the state museum if you need to have a reference. Daniel Case (talk) 22:25, 22 March 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Tropical cyclones Newsletter

I currently have a bot that delivers newsletters. Could it deliver this WP's newsletter to? Please reply on my talk page. Thanks, - Milk's Favorite Cookie 23:25, 14 March 2008 (UTC)

Alright. I would be glad to deliever it. When it's ready, simply list it on the bot's userpage. (Under the appropriate section) BTW, if you know any other WP's that have newsletters, please ask them if I can deliver it. Thanks, - Milk's Favorite Cookie 00:29, 15 March 2008 (UTC)

IRC

I rejoined the IRC channel, tornado warnings over the north suburbs. I just wanted to let my computer settle down for awhile as it was starting to run slowly. Southern Illinois SKYWARN (talk) 17:07, 15 March 2008 (UTC)

Re: Banner

It's kind of a secret between me and Chetblong. I can make one for you if you would like. And preferences (font, images, text etc.)? - Milk's Favorite Cookie 23:53, 15 March 2008 (UTC)

Would you like the image on the left or right? - Milk's Favorite Cookie 00:03, 16 March 2008 (UTC)

How does it look? Feel free to suggest any changes. BTW, I see you used my "Vandal Protector" ;) - Milk's Favorite Cookie 00:11, 16 March 2008 (UTC)

Ahh, yes, he took it from me ;) - Milk's Favorite Cookie 00:15, 16 March 2008 (UTC)

No, there is no need to give credit :) I always joke around with WBOSITG like that ;) - Milk's Favorite Cookie 00:44, 16 March 2008 (UTC)

Peer review idea

Hi, I have made a proposal that no peer review request be archived without some response. To aid in this, there is a new list of PR requests at least one week old that have had no repsonses beyond a semi-automated peer review. This list is at Wikipedia:Peer review/backlog.

There are just over 100 names on the PR volunteers page, so I figure if each of these volunteers reviewed just one or two PR requests without a response from the list each month, it would easily take care of the "no response" backlog (as there have been 2 or 3 such unanswered requests a day on average).

If you would be able to help out with a review or two a month from the "no responses" backlog list that would be great (and much appreciated). Please discuss questions, comments, or ideas at the PR talk page and thanks in advance for your help, Ruhrfisch _><>°^° 00:23, 16 March 2008 (UTC)

Bot

When you make the newsletter there are simple instructions to follow on the bot's user page. I haven't tested it yet, but I'm pretty sure it works. Thanks, - Milk's Favorite Cookie 18:15, 16 March 2008 (UTC)

When it's ready obviously. What will it deliver if you add it to the page with no newsletter? :p - Milk's Favorite Cookie 19:56, 16 March 2008 (UTC)

No, you're not bothering me. Jj is an awesome copyeditor. He has copyedited many many articles. I'll also take a look at it. - Milk's Favorite Cookie 22:55, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

I just started copyediting. Regardless, you've got yourself a GA :) - Milk's Favorite Cookie 23:51, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

St. Patrick's Day

Rome moved the celebrations to this past Saturday March 15 this year (as well as a number of large cities in the United States), because it is apparently not "kosher" to celebrate the holiday between Palm Sunday and Easter, and is the first time it has been moved since 1940. This was on wikipedia news last week, and yahoo news the week before. Happy day-that-would-otherwise-be-St. Patrick's Day though. Thegreatdr (talk) 21:48, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

RFA thanks

		Thanks for the support
		Thanks for your support on my request for adminship. It passed 92/2/2, as you obviously know. You've been a good protégé these last few months, and it's bound to get better from here! IDK, I see you on IRC all the time, so I'll just talk to you tomorrow or so. ♬♩ Hurricanehink (talk) 02:19, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for helping with Jerry

I had completely forgot what the website of finding NCDC listed damages was. I tried searching the NCDC website with no avail late this morning. Thegreatdr (talk) 19:03, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

		The Minor Barnstar
		I hearby award you the minor barnstar for making important small contributions to the Tropical Storm Jerry (1995) article which preserved content that would have otherwise been lost. Thegreatdr (talk) 19:18, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

Effects of Hurricane Dennis in Florida

I went through the article and made a few minor, probably irrelevant changes. It looks very good, which made it hard to find things to fix! Best of luck with it.   jj137 (talk) 19:49, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

Are you going to nominate for FA? - Milk's Favorite Cookie 23:18, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

No, I was only on their once. :( I'm rarely on IRC - sorry. - Milk's Favorite Cookie 23:43, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

No. Actually I really don't know why I'm never on IRC :0 - Milk's Favorite Cookie 23:45, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

Actually - I just tried it right now. It said "Firefox does not know how to open..." - Milk's Favorite Cookie 23:56, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

That works. But not the "regular" IRC. - Milk's Favorite Cookie 00:05, 19 March 2008 (UTC)

No. As soon as you get the article an FA it automatically loses it's GA status. Sorry, I didn't see your message. - Milk's Favorite Cookie 00:22, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

Hmm... That would be pretty odd. I would suggest waiting. - Milk's Favorite Cookie 00:26, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

No, you're not bugging me. I love seeing the "new messages" bar :)

- Milk's Favorite Cookie has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Cheers, and Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Yeah. I like it. :) - Milk's Favorite Cookie 00:39, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for the cookie! :) - Milk's Favorite Cookie 00:48, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

It's all the same :) I don't know, but......

Please accept this invite to join the Celtics WikiProject, a WikiProject dedicated to improving all articles associated with the Boston Celtics. Simply click here to accept!

- Milk's Favorite Cookie 01:52, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

Well then ;)...Thanks!

Hi, and welcome to the Celtics WikiProject! We are a group of (mainly) Celtics fans who help to improve coverage related to the Boston Celtics on Wikipedia.

Looking for somewhere to start? Here is a few suggestions.

• You can check out topics on the main page.
• You can add {{WikiProject Boston Celtics}} to talk pages of Boston Celtics-related articles, and assess them as well.
• Check out the to do list for the WikiProject, and opt to try and complete some of those tasks.

If you have any comments, suggestions, or would like to talk about the project in general, feel free to leave a message on the talk page.

- Milk's Favorite Cookie 02:00, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

Heck, only 5-6 members are active in the project anyway. (Probably less) I've gotten used to it :) - Milk's Favorite Cookie 02:04, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

Nope - not 1. ;( - Milk's Favorite Cookie 02:08, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

Yeah. The two I'm working on sadly have nothing to do with the Celtics. And, yeah -rub it in... :) - Milk's Favorite Cookie 02:12, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

Yep - Rub it in :0 - Milk's Favorite Cookie 02:18, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

Charley Critique

• I responded on Charley's talk page. Please leave some more specific criticisms so I can begin to deal with them. TheNobleSith (talk) 02:44, 19 March 2008 (UTC)

• I responded as well. We need to hash this out. How can he, or anyone, possibly double or triple the size of this article without restating facts? Charley impacted a small area of Texas and northeast Mexico. There are only five TCDs for him to work off of for storm history. The storm didn't live that long. When I created the Texas hurricane history in real time (1997-1999), there was very little information available concerning Charley. Last I checked, the only size criteria for GA involved sections not being stubs. I do agree on filling out the references more...but not on cite web being a must for GA. If it were, I would never have been able to have any articles I submit for GAC pass, since I don't use that style of referencing. Thegreatdr (talk) 14:45, 19 March 2008 (UTC)

You know something odd...I can't see your messasges on your own talk page Julian. I see people responding to you here, but not your actual messages. Do you remove them or something?TheNobleSith (talk) 15:08, 19 March 2008 (UTC)

RfA Thanks

	Thanks!
So, yeah, you know how these work... »»»» Thank you very much for your support in my recent RfA, which closed with a final tally of (75/1/0). Your trust in me is greatly appreciated, and I can assure you it has not been misplaced. I shall use these tools to the best of my ability, and will do my best not to let you down. Thank you once again, and happy editing as always! Hersfold (t/a/c) 20:12, 19 March 2008 (UTC)

Signpost updated for March 13th and 17th, 2008.

Weekly Delivery

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 23:07, 19 March 2008 (UTC)

March 2008 Midwest floods

I just started this article, it obviously sucks a lot. I was hoping you would be able to help me with this article. Thanks, Southern Illinois SKYWARN (talk) 00:19, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

I'm afraid I couldn't find any references for the sypnosis, so if you can find any, please post them. Southern Illinois SKYWARN (talk) 00:45, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

Thanks

Hey, just wanted to say thanks for help with Charley. It may have seemed like I was arguing or angry, but I was really just kind of frustrated.TheNobleSith (talk) 02:44, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

Happy First Day of Spring!

Happy First Day of Spring!

A Beautiful Cherry Tree in Spring Bloom

Theres nothing like seeing a field full of spring flowers.

Just wishing you a wonderful First Day of Spring 2008! ~~~~

If you live in the Southern Hemisphere and are entering the season of Autumn not Spring then I wish you a happy First Day of Autumn 2008!

Whoa

Oh snap, the DEA is an admin

I would like to thank you for your participation in my recent RfA, which I'm very glad to say was successful at 81/7/0. Some of the very best that Wikipedia has to offer came out to support or oppose me and the kind words from all the editors has really given me confidence to be an admin and I can't wait to start. I will take the advice of the opposes and not jump into any content disputes immediately. As well, I will try to add more content myself. Anyways, in thanks for participating in my RfA, here's a Korean Fir. Enjoy! --ÐeadΣyeДrrow (Talk - Contribs) 19:15, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

Sorry for forgetting ya, so I gave you a one of a kind gift. --ÐeadΣyeДrrow (Talk - Contribs) 19:15, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

Peer Review Request

Hey Julian. Please peer review Tropical Storm Charley (1998) when you can. Thanks. TheNobleSith (talk) 23:08, 21 March 2008 (UTC)

USRD Newsletter - Issue 3

The U.S. Roads WikiProject Newsletter
Volume 2, Issue 3 • 22 March 2008 • About the Newsletter
Departments Project news Deletion debates Featured member From the editors Coming and going	Features Scope debate causes issues A-class review sets new rule Three editors get triple crown award	State and national updates Leaderboard California Connecticut Kansas Michigan Nevada New Jersey New York Oklahoma Texas Utah Vermont Washington
Archives • Newsroom • Full Issue • Shortcut: WP:USRD/NEWS

Want to help on next month's newsletter? Don't want to receive these in future? Want to change your method of delivery? – It's all here. —О бот (т • ц) 21:31, 22 March 2008 (UTC)