Talk:Juliagrace

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article must adhere to the policy on biographies of living persons. Controversial material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted or if there are other concerns relative to this policy, report it on the living persons biographies noticeboard.

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.	Biography Portal
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's quality scale. [FAQ] Please rate the article and, if you wish, leave comments here regarding your assessment or the strengths and weaknesses of the article.

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.

This article makes a claim for notability: number 1 single on a major chart. This needs to be verified... but it shouldn't be speedyed. ---J.S (t|c) 21:31, 25 April 2006 (UTC)

Sorry, I didn't see the #1 single part. That is notable. I will remove the tags. --waffle iron ^talk 21:32, 25 April 2006 (UTC)

Not saying it IS notable, but it makes the claim :) I wasn't able to verify it and no souce is provided. I sugust sending it to WP:AfD. ---J.S (t|c) 21:36, 25 April 2006 (UTC)

The Claim for notability should probably be made on both the number 1 single on the Rhema Radio network (nationwide in New Zealand)and her International Touring (now added)with a link to her website and list of appearances. To Verify the Rhema network via a link maybe difficult as i see they havent updated their "top 20" list since Feb and it was after this date that she went to number 1.

I noticed that. They were ranked 16 in feb, so that can count a bit. But there needs to be verification on that #1 or that statement will need to be removed. ---J.S (t|c) 23:53, 25 April 2006 (UTC)