Talk:Julia Baird

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Good article Julia Baird has been listed as one of the Language and literature good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can delist it, or ask for a reassessment.
January 28, 2008 Good article nominee Listed


Good article GA
This article has
been rated as
GA-Class
on the
assessment scale.
  This Beatles-related article is within the scope of The Beatles WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve and expand Wikipedia coverage of The Beatles, Apple Records, George Martin, Brian Epstein/NEMS, and related topics. You are more than welcome to join the project and/or contribute to discussion.

Mid
This article has
been rated as
Mid importance on the
importance scale.

Article Grading:
The article has been rated for quality and/or importance but has no comments yet. If appropriate, please review the article and then leave comments here to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article and what work it will need.


Contents


[edit] Start

I have just started this article - so please bear with me. --andreasegde (talk) 16:01, 23 December 2007 (UTC)

I will sort out the mess of info as soon as I can. --andreasegde (talk) 18:42, 23 December 2007 (UTC)

Good grief - Julia Lennon, Julia Dykins Baird, John 'Bobby' Dykins, John Lennon, Alfred Lennon... It makes my head whirl... --andreasegde (talk) 06:38, 24 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] More to go in

The childhood memories of Baird, and playing with Lennon should go in. It's a pity there isn't more biog info, but that will have to come out of the books. --andreasegde (talk) 08:52, 24 December 2007 (UTC)

I have nominated it. --andreasegde (talk) 14:33, 13 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] GA pass

Very well-referenced. The only thing I would fix would be a few minor things. For one there is so much parenthetical info in the lead it gets a bit hard to follow sometimes. A copyedit by someone who wasn't familiar with the article would be good, but there are no obvious grammatical errors. It passes. Wrad (talk) 00:40, 28 January 2008 (UTC)

I thank you kindly. I will take your advice and look at the Lead. --andreasegde (talk) 02:39, 28 January 2008 (UTC)